Cited by 46TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar CellsIndustrial Gas Emission ControlRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Preparation of nanocrystalline TiO2-coated coal fly ash and effect of iron oxides in coal fly ash on photocatalytic activity

Yu, Yeon-tae·2004·Powder Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.powtec.2004.06.006

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y.-T.
Affiliations
Jeonbuk National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Yu, Yeon-tae
Venue
Powder Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
146
Issue
1-2
Pages
154-159
ISSN
0032-5910 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966387751
Cited by
46
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Powder Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Industrial Gas Emission Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Keywords
TiO2 photocatalyst, coal fly ash, immobilized photocatalyst, anatase, iron oxide, magnetite, hematite, NO removal, photocatalytic activity, heat treatment, crystallite size, wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review