CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesHistorical Linguistics and Language Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How directive constructions emerge: Grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation

Mauri, Caterina, Sansò, Andrea·2011·Journal of Pragmatics
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Anderson, Ralph D., 1963. A grammar of Laz. PhD Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.
  2. Asher, 2001, Indirect speech acts, Synthese, 128, 183, 10.1023/A:1010340508140 · DOI
  3. Barrett, Edward R. 1999. A grammar of Sipakapense Maya. PhD Dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.
  4. Bat-El, 2002, True Truncation in Colloquial Hebrew Imperatives, Language, 651, 10.1353/lan.2003.0003 · DOI
  5. Bybee, 1998, “Irrealis” as a grammatical category, Anthropological Linguistics, 40, 257
  6. Chung, 1985, Tense, aspect, and mood, vol. 3, 202
  7. Clark, 1979, Responding to indirect speech acts, Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430, 10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3 · DOI
  8. Cristofaro, Sonia, Descriptive notions vs. grammatical categories: unrealized states of affairs and ‘irrealis’. Language Sciences, in press.
  9. Croft, 2010, The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience, Linguistics, 48, 1, 10.1515/ling.2010.001 · DOI
  10. Curnow, Timothy J., 1997. A grammar of Awa Pit (Cuaiquer): An indigenous language of south-western Colombia. PhD Dissertation. Australian National University.
  11. de Haan, Ferdinand. Irrealis: fact or fiction? Language Sciences, in press.
  12. Essegbey, 2004, Auxiliaries in serializing languages: on COME and GO verbs in Sranan and Ewe, Lingua, 114, 473, 10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00069-X · DOI
  13. Frajzyngier, 2006, The Principle of Indirect Means in language use and language structure, Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 513, 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.010 · DOI
  14. Givón, 1981, Typology and functional domains, Studies in Language, 5, 163, 10.1075/sl.5.2.03giv · DOI
  15. Haspelmath, 1990, The grammaticization of passive morphology, Studies in Language, 14, 25, 10.1075/sl.14.1.03has · DOI
  16. Hofling, 1994, Yucatec Maya imperatives and other manipulative language, International Journal of American Linguistics, 60, 272, 10.1086/466234 · DOI
  17. König, 2007, Speech act distinctions in grammar, vol. 1, 276
  18. Magomedova, 2004, Chamalal, vol. 3, 1
  19. Mauri, Caterina, Sansò, Andrea. The reality status of directives and its coding across languages. Language Sciences, in press.
  20. Nicolle, 2007, The grammaticalization of tense markers: A pragmatic reanalysis, Cahiers Chronos, 17, 47
  21. Panther, 1998, A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation, Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 755, 10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00028-9 · DOI
  22. Post, Mark, 2008. A grammar of Galo. PhD Dissertation. Research Center for Linguistic Typology, La Trobe University.
  23. Schalley, Ewa. 2008. Imperatives. A typological approach. PhD Dissertation. University of Antwerp.
  24. Spatar, 1997, Imperative constructions in Cambodian, Mon-Khmer Studies, 27, 119
  25. Tavangar, 2006, Deictic projection: an inquiry into the future-oriented past tense in Persian, Studia Linguistica, 60, 97, 10.1111/j.1467-9582.2006.00134.x · DOI
  26. Tavangar, 2009, Subjective modality and tense in Persian, Language Sciences, 31, 853, 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.12.016 · DOI
  27. Watters, 2006, Notes on Kusunda Grammar, Himalayan Linguistics Archive, 3, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mauri, C., & Sansò, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pavia (IT)
  • University of Insubria (IT)
Corresponding author
Sansò, Andrea
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
43
Issue
14
Pages
3489-3521
ISSN
0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001
OpenAlex
W2046628569
Cited by
90
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 28 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Pragmatics (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Keywords
grammaticalization, constructionalization, co-optation, imperative sentences, indirect speech acts, face-threatening acts, diachronic change, speech act theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review