Indirect speech acts
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The simplest cases of meaning are those in which the speaker utters a sentence and means exactly and literally what he says. In such cases the speaker intends to produce a certain illocutionary effect in the hearer, and he intends to produce this effect by getting the hearer to recognize his intention to produce it, and he intends to get the hearer to recognize this intention in virtue of the hearer's knowledge of the rules that govern the utterance of the sentence. But, notoriously, not all cases of meaning are this simple: In hints, insinuations, irony, and metaphor – to mention a few examples – the speaker's utterance meaning and the sentence meaning come apart in various ways. One important class of such cases is that in which the speaker utters a sentence, means what he says, but also means something more. For example, a speaker may utter the sentence “I want you to do it” by way of requesting the hearer to do something. The utterance is incidentally meant as a statement, but it is also meant primarily as a request, a request made by way of making a statement. In such cases a sentence that contains the illocutionary force indicators for one kind of illocutionary act can be uttered to perform, in addition , another type of illocutionary act.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Introduction to Sociolinguistics
Wardhaugh, R. (1986) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 2,007 · see citing works
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74 · Cited by 2,479 · see citing works
Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies
Sbisà, M. (1992) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(92)90006-w · Cited by 1,695 · see citing works
Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese
Matsumoto, Y. (1988) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 · Cited by 1,028 · see citing works
Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics
Rasmussen, G. (1997) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(97)84203-8 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence
Bond, A. H., & Gasser, L. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07700-6 · Cited by 1,007 · see citing works
Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different?
Blum-Kulka, S. (1987) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5 · Cited by 891 · see citing works
van Dijk, T. A. (2019) · Cited by 854 · see citing works
The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama
Elam, K. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203426074 · Cited by 800 · see citing works
Analyzing intention in utterances
Allen, J. F., & Perrault, C. R. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90042-9 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Is Sybil there? the structure of some American English directives
Ervin-Tripp, S. Μ. (1976) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500006849 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts
Cohen, P. R., & Perrault, C. R. (1979) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(79)80006-3 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts
Wierzbicka, A. (1985) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(85)90023-2 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy
Rosaldo, M. Z. (1982) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500009209 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
“…of "speech act theory" tends to refer to developments initiated by Austin's discussions of the "performative/constative" distinction and of "illocutionary force" (1962, 1963), receiving their fullest formulation in the writings of the Berkeley philosopher, John Searle (1965, 1969, 1976, 1979a).”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the psycholinguistics of sarcasm.
Gibbs, R. W. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.3 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Linguistics: an introduction to language and communication
(1982) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(82)90237-1 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1982) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1982.0042 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting
Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351810802028613 · Cited by 802 · see citing works
Beyond the micro-level in politeness research
Terkourafi, M. (2005) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.237 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Responding to indirect speech acts
Clark, H. H. (1979) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics
Griffiths, P. (2006) · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Relational propositions in discourse
Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1986) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638538609544632 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches
Ludwig, K. A. (2007) · Midwest Studies in Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.2007.00160.x · Cited by 385 · see citing works
A Plan Recognition Model for Subdialogues in Conversations
Litman, D. J., & Allen, J. (1987) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(87)80005-8 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory*
Gibbs, R. W. (1984) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0803_4 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Ogiermann, E. (2009) · Journal of Politeness Research · doi:10.1515/jplr.2009.011 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker.
Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. A. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019688 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Helpful and nonhelpful events in brief counseling interviews: An empirical taxonomy.
Elliott, R. (1985) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.32.3.307 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Polite responses to polite requests
Clark, H. H. (1980) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(80)90009-8 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
The Structure and Interpretation of Imperatives: Mood and Force in Universal Grammar
Han, C. (2000) · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Holtgraves, T., & Joong-nam, Y. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.719 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
A Methodological Framework for the Sociology of Culture
Griswold, W. (1987) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271027 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use
Sbisà, M. (2001) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00060-6 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
On questions following questions in service encounters
Merritt, M. (1976) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500007168 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
A plan-based analysis of indirect speech acts
Perrault, C. R., & Allen, J. F. (1980) · doi:10.5555/972537.972540 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Pragmatics in memory: A study of natural conversation
Keenan, J. M., MacWhinney, B., & Mayhew, D. (1977) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80018-2 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Words as social tools: language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts
Borghi, A. M., Barca, L., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Pezzulo, G., & Tummolini, L. (2019) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“Studies of pragmatics have shown that sentences as “You are married” can be considered as actions that change the status of the relationship between people [60,61].”
BackgroundDo people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests?
Gibbs, R. W. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.524 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
What does grammar tell us about action?
Couper‐Kuhlen, E. (2015) · Pragmatics Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) · doi:10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Learning to Communicate in the Classroom
Ellis, R. (1992) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100010445 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Holtgraves, T., & Joong-nam, Y. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.62.2.246 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation
Panther, K.-U., & Thornburg, L. L. (1998) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00028-9 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Describing talk : a taxonomy of verbal response modes
Stiles, W. B. (1992) · Sage Pub. eBooks · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Signing behavior in apes: A critical review
Seidenberg, M. S., & Petitto, L. A. (1979) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(79)90019-2 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Readings in Artificial Intelligence
(1981) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07694-3 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts
Kecskés, I. (2010) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.008 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
On the universality of face: evidence from chinese compliment response behavior
Yu, M.-C. (2003) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00074-2 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Some Notes on Noun Incorporation
Sadock, J. M. (1986) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1986.0077 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Introduction to Healthcare for Spanish-speaking Interpreters and Translators
Crezee, I. H. M., Mikkelson, H. M., & Monzon-Storey, L. (2015) · John Benjamins Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1075/z.193 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Ephratt, M. (2008) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.009 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Gajewski, J. (2007) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10988-007-9020-z · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions
Wallsten, T. S., Fillenbaum, S., & Cox, J. A. (1986) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(86)90012-4 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Speech Acts in the History of English
Jucker, A. H., & Taavitsainen, I. (2008) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.176 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Clark, H. H. (1997) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539709545003 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures
Ogiermann, E. (2009) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.191 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90032-1 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Force, negation and imperatives
Han, C. (2001) · The Linguistic Review · doi:10.1515/tlir.2001.004 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning
Soler, E. A., & Jordà, M. P. S. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Conversational Exercitives: Something Else We do with Our Words
McGowan, M. K. (2004) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1023/b:ling.0000010803.47264.f0 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure∗
Cicourel, A. V. (1980) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638538009544482 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development
Brinton, L. J. (2012) · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Neg-raising : polarity and presupposition
Gajewski, J. (2005) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Schecter, S. R., & Bayley, R. J. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587836 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
“Direct” and “indirect” communicative acts in semiotic perspective
Silverstein, M. (2010) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.003 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
The contrast between interrogatives and questions
Huddleston, R. (1994) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226700016704 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future
Roever, C. (2011) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532210394633 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts
Stefanowitsch, A. (2003) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.113.09ste · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Holtz, P., Kronberger, N., & Wagner, W. (2012) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000062 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
McGowan, M. K. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198829706.001.0001 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Why are idioms recognized fast?
Tabossi, P. L., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.37.4.529 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
How children comprehend speech acts and communicative gestures
Bucciarelli, M., Colle, L., & Bara, B. G. (2002) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00099-1 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Interpreting discourse: Coherence and the analysis of ethnographic interviews
Agar, M., & Hobbs, J. R. (1982) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638538209544529 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives andMi X?Interrogatives in Italian
Rossi, G. (2012) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/0163853x.2012.684136 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
The Surface-Compositional Semantics of English Intonation
Steedman, M. J. (2014) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2014.0010 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences
Bhatia, A. (2006) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926506058057 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Language of Requesting in Israeli Society
Blum‐Kulka, S., Danet, B., & Gherson, R. (1985) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5074-6_7 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
KNOME: Modeling What the User Knows in UC
Chin, D. N. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83230-7_4 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Meibauer, J. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.007 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Persuasive Storytelling by Hate Groups Online
LEE, E., & Leets, L. (2002) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764202045006003 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Discourse in the Production of Classroom Knowledge: Reading Lessons
Heap, J. L. (1985) · Curriculum Inquiry · doi:10.1080/03626784.1985.11075966 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
A Cognitive-pragmatic Approach to Situation-bound Utterances
Yu-xia, M. (2005) · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1999) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00005-3 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Invitations in Persian and English: Ostensible or genuine?
Eslami, Z. R. (2005) · Intercultural Pragmatics · doi:10.1515/iprg.2005.2.4.453 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“For any speech act to function properly, certain preparatory conditions must be met (Searle 1969; Searle 1975).”
Understanding old words with new meanings
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1983) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90364-x · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests∗
Gibbs, R. W. (1979) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638537909544450 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Biscuit Conditionals: Quantification Over Potential Literal Acts
Siegel, M. E. A. (2006) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10988-006-0003-2 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Young children's understanding of a speaker's intentional use of a false utterance.
Ackerman, B. P. (1981) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.472 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Sidtis, D. V. L. (2004) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1080/13682820310001601080 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms.
Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R. W. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.119.3.315 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Concealing one's meaning from overhearers
Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(87)90124-0 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
You call that a rhetorical question?
Frank, J. (1990) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(90)90003-v · Cited by 154 · see citing works
The Principle of Indirect Means in language use and language structure
Frajzyngier, Z., & Jirsa, B. (2005) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.010 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Given as new: When redundant affirmation isn't
Horn, L. R. (1991) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(91)90034-u · Cited by 151 · see citing works
What makes some indirect speech acts conventional?
Gibbs, R. W. (1986) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(86)90028-8 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests
Gibbs, R. W. (1981) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90542-9 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Towards a cognitive approach to politeness
Escandell‐Vidal, V. (1996) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0388-0001(96)00039-3 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Dialogue‐Games: Metacommunication Structures for Natural Language Interaction*
Levin, J. A., & Moore, J. A. (1977) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0104_2 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Shatz, M. (1978) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90001-4 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Speech acts in interaction: A critique of Searle∗
Streeck, J. (1980) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638538009544483 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Referential/attributive: A contextualist proposal
Récanati, F. (1989) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00354363 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Searle, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- John Rogers Searle
- Venue
- Expression and Meaning
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Published
- 1979-10-31
- Pages
- 30-57
- OpenAlex
- W2995748625
- Cited by
- 1,393
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 49
- FWCI
- 285.41
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- indirect speech acts, illocutionary force, illocutionary acts, speech act theory, utterance meaning, requests, hints, insinuation, irony, metaphor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
