The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony
Open accessAbstract
Hyperbolic use of language is very frequent but has seldom been thought worthy of serious analytical attention. Hyperbole is usually treated as a minor trope which belongs with one or the other of the two dominant figurative uses of language, metaphor and irony. In this paper, we examine the range of ways in which hyperbole is manifest, in both its ‘pure’ uses and its prevalent co-occurrences with other tropes. We conclude that it does not align closely with either metaphor or irony but is a distinctive figure of speech in its own right, characterized by the blatant exaggeration of a relevant scalar property for the purpose of expressing an evaluation of a state of affairs. The relative simplicity of hyperbole enables its exploitation of a range of independent mechanisms of non-literal linguistic communication including loose use, metaphor, simile, and expressions of ironical and other attitudes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1989) · Cited by 4,498
Relevance. Communication and cognition
Stoerig, P. (1987) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(87)90070-4 · Cited by 3,904
Relevance: Communication and Cognition
Pust, L., Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1997) · Language · doi:10.2307/415932 · Cited by 1,903
Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory
Happé, F. G. E. (1993) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90026-r · Cited by 1,146
Understanding Figurative Language
Glucksberg, S. (2001) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001 · Cited by 858
Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics
Gazdar, G., & Klein, E. (1980) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/0378-2166(80)90026-0 · Cited by 697
Further Notes on Logic and Conversation
Grice, H. P. (2008) · Reasoning · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511814273.039 · Cited by 661
A unitary approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad hoc concepts
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007) · Pragmatics · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-73908-0_12 · Cited by 644
Self-citationUnderstanding figurative language: from metaphors to idioms
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-3217 · Cited by 600
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/0024-3841(92)90025-e · Cited by 575
Cited by
Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony
Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12096 · Cited by 308
Punton, G., Dodd, A. L., & McNeill, A. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265542 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Carston, R., & Wearing, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 79-92
- ISSN
- 0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069307174
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 18.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011
- The paper
- Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2015). Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
