The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Functional Grammar
Matthiessen, C., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1989) · Language · doi:10.2307/414947 · Cited by 9,880
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Castro, C. D., & Halliday, M. A. K. (1995) · Language · doi:10.2307/415759 · Cited by 5,989
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses
Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf · Cited by 5,039
Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization
Chen, C. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307513100 · Cited by 2,791
Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing
Sun, J., & Hyland, K. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587657 · Cited by 1,970
Self-citation(1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5365.797k · Cited by 1,281
Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal
Hyland, K. (2004) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/25.2.156 · Cited by 1,241 · cited 1×
“The meaning of a text is the result of these two elements working together: an integration of talk about the experiential world and how this is made coherent, intelligible and persuasive to a particular audience (Hyland and Tse, 2004).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCRISMORE, A., MARKKANEN, R., & STEFFENSEN, M. S. (1993) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088393010001002 · Cited by 743
Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English
Ädel, A. (2006) · Studies in Corpus Linguistics · doi:10.1075/scl.24 · Cited by 662
Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader
Thompson, G. (2001) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.58 · Cited by 559
Cited by
Ament, J., Páres, J. B., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2020) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009 · Cited by 20
Vasheghani Farahani, M., & Pahlevansadegh, V. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-10-2018-0222 · Cited by 8
Li, J., & Hu, W. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12793 · Cited by 2
Sadigzade, Z. (2026) · Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum · doi:10.69760/aghel.026001005 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyland, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Pragmatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 16-29
- ISSN
- 0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2598166245
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 377.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
- The paper
- Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
