Cited by 98Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisCultural and political discourse analysis

The pragmatics of manipulation: Exploiting im/politeness theories

Open access
Sorlin, Sandrine·2017·Journal of Pragmatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.002

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Together, the salutation resources foster the development of a trust bond with the minor and initiate manipulation in the access phase of the model of Lorenzo-Dus (2023).

    “Together, these resources foster the development of a trust bond with the minor and initiate manipulation (Sorlin, 2017) in the access phase of the model of Lorenzo-Dus (2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sorlin, S.
Affiliations
Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Sorlin, Sandrine
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
121
Pages
132-146
ISSN
0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765242742
Cited by
97
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
25.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pragmatics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Institut Universitaire de France
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Cultural and political discourse analysis
Keywords
manipulation, manipulative discourse, politeness theory, impoliteness, cooperative principles, face-threatening acts, self-face, emotional vulnerability, House of Cards, persuasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review