CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 517Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistics and Language AnalysisLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations

Spencer-Oatey∗, Helen·2002·Journal of Pragmatics
DOI 10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00039-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00039-x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maintaining rapport and consent while the other interactant has a different motivation can create relational tensions that need to be managed, especially when one party's motivation has negative consequences for or requires impositions on the other.

    “Maintaining rapport and consent from a participant in an interaction while the other interactant has a different motivation can create 'relational tensions' (Spencer-Oatey 2002: 542) that need to be managed, more so when the motivation of one party has negative consequences for or requires impositions on the other.”

    From The Language of Romance Crimes (2024) · cites this paper as Spencer-Oatey 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Spencer-Oatey∗, H.
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
529-545
ISSN
0378-2166 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00039-x
OpenAlex
W2077621843
Cited by
517
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
34.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Pragmatics (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
rapport management, politeness theory, face, negative face, Gricean maxims, speech acts, order, autonomy, social identity, interpersonal relationships, relationship management, conceptual framework, everyday conversation, self and other, Chinese language use, intercultural communication, pragmatics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review