Cited by 60Antibiotic Use and ResistanceVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesVeterinary medicine and infectious diseases

Antimicrobial use practices, attitudes and responsibilities in UK farm animal veterinary surgeons

Open access
Coyne, L.A., Latham, S.M., Dawson, S., Donald, I.J., Pearson, R.B., Smith, R.F., Williams, N.J., Pinchbeck, G.L.·2018·Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Abstract

Increasing levels of antimicrobial resistance in human and veterinary medicine have raised concerns around the issue of overprescribing and the indiscriminate use of antimicrobials. Their use in food producing animals is under scrutiny due to the perceived risk from the zoonotic transfer of resistant pathogens from animals to humans. This study aimed to explore UK veterinary surgeons antimicrobial prescribing behaviours, their attitudes to antimicrobial resistance and their perceptions of responsibility of antimicrobial use in pigs through a questionnaire study on a census sample of 261 veterinary surgeons in England, Wales and Scotland who had a clinical caseload which included commercial pigs. The questionnaire had a useable response rate of 34.1% (n = 61/179) in eligible veterinary surgeons. Overall, veterinary surgeons reported personal confidence that their prescribing decisions were responsible however, there was concern that the prescribing behaviours of other veterinary surgeons and physicians in human medicine may be less responsible; a sociological concept known as 'othering'. In parallel, veterinary surgeons seldom identified that treatment failure was a consequence of antimicrobial resistance in their own clinical caseload, however they considered it an issue for other veterinary surgeons and for human prescribers. Veterinary surgeons consulted a wide spectrum of resources on antimicrobial use in pigs which, on occasion, contained conflicting guidance on what was defined as responsible prescribing. The decision over whether or not to prescribe an antimicrobial was influenced by numerous factors relating to the veterinary surgeons' experience and the clinical situation presented, but maintaining pig welfare was a high priority. There was a shared desire to seek alternative methods to prevent disease to antimicrobial use, however the use of diagnostics to support prescribing decisions was an infrequently reported behaviour and could play a more significant role in prescriber decisions if more cost effective and rapid tests were available. Future interventions to optimise antimicrobial use in pigs needs to focus on the evolution of antimicrobial use practices in a changing political and scientific landscape whilst also considering individual motivations and justifications for use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.021

Cites

72 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers to the responsible use of antibiotics include cost, time constraints, a lack of rapid diagnostic tools, and farmer expectations.

    “Barriers to the responsible use of antibiotics include cost, time constraints, a lack of rapid diagnostic tools, and farmer expectations (25, 26).”

    From Understanding antibiotic decision-making for bovine respiratory disease: a survey of UK farm veterinarians (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion says cost and delays in obtaining diagnostic results may hinder testing and calls for rapid, cost-effective tests. Results §3.2 reports that a farmer wanting antimicrobials could influence prescribing. The paper supports those barriers, but it does not establish general time constraints as a barrier to responsible use; its discussion of time concerns diagnostic turnaround. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fewer than one-fifth (19%) of farm veterinarians performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) when a bacterial infection was first suspected.

    “However, a UK survey found that fewer than one-fifth (19%) of farm veterinarians performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) when a bacterial infection was first suspected (25).”

    From Understanding antibiotic decision-making for bovine respiratory disease: a survey of UK farm veterinarians (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    Section 3.3 (page unavailable) says that fewer than one-fifth of surveyed veterinary surgeons reported performing AST frequently when bacterial infection was initially suspected. The claim omits “frequently,” making the figure sound like the proportion who performed AST at all; the available text also does not give the exact 19%. Figure 2 identifies the respondents as UK pig veterinary surgeons (n = 61). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Decisions based solely on clinical observation or fever risk increase inappropriate antibiotic use.

    “Decisions based solely on clinical observation or fever risk increase inappropriate antibiotic use (25, 46).”

    From Understanding antibiotic decision-making for bovine respiratory disease: a survey of UK farm veterinarians (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion (page not available in our copy) says diagnostic testing is essential to identify the pathogen behind clinical signs and ensure appropriate antimicrobial use. That supports concern about relying on clinical observation alone, but the paper does not address fever-based decisions or demonstrate that either practice increases inappropriate use. The prescribing scenarios in Section 3.2 could not be evaluated for appropriateness against guidelines. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The reliance on tetracyclines, phenicols, and macrolides appears driven by their broad-spectrum activity, established clinical efficacy, ease of administration, and affordability.

    “This reliance on tetracyclines, phenicols, and macrolides appears driven by their broad-spectrum activity, established clinical efficacy, ease of administration, and affordability (25, 49).”

    From Understanding antibiotic decision-making for bovine respiratory disease: a survey of UK farm veterinarians (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    Section 3.2 reports that tetracyclines were the most frequent first-line choice and macrolides the second most common for one pig respiratory-disease scenario. It does not establish reliance on phenicols or attribute these prescribing choices to broad-spectrum activity, efficacy, ease of administration, or affordability; searches for phenicols and those reasons found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Economic constraints and perceived safety profiles still frequently outweigh AMS concerns in field settings, explaining routine oxytetracycline use.

    “the routine use of oxytetracycline suggests that economic constraints and perceived safety profiles (25, 54) still frequently outweigh AMS concerns in field settings.”

    From Understanding antibiotic decision-making for bovine respiratory disease: a survey of UK farm veterinarians (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    Section 3.2 reports that tetracyclines were the most frequent first-line choice in a pig respiratory-disease scenario, and the Discussion says respondents rarely attributed treatment failures to antimicrobial resistance. The paper does not establish routine oxytetracycline use specifically or show that economic constraints and perceived safety profiles frequently outweigh stewardship concerns in choosing it; the Discussion's cost concern relates to diagnostic testing. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Christley, R.M., et al., 2017. How Political Cultures Produce Different Antibiotic Policies in Agriculture: a Historical Comparative Case Study Between the United Kingdom and. Available at:. Wiley-Blackwell, Sweden. https://liverpool.idm.oclc.org/login? url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ir00019a&AN=uol. 3014030&site=eds-live&scope=site.
  2. Jackson, P.G.G., Cockcroft, P.D., 2007. Handbook of Pig Medicine, Handbook of Pig Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-2828-1.X5001-4. · DOI
  3. PHWC, 2015. Best Practice Guide to Antimicrobial Review on Pig Farms. PVS Clinical Review document.pdf.. http://www.pigvetsoc.org.uk/files/document/555/1510.
  4. 0b013e3181eab0ec. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coyne, L. A., Latham, S. M., Dawson, S., Donald, I. J., Pearson, R. B., Smith, R. F., Williams, N. J., & Pinchbeck, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Coyne, L.A.
Venue
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
161
Pages
115-126
ISSN
0167-5877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899453724
Cited by
60
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Veterinary Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Veterinary Medicines Directorate
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial prescribing, pigs, responsible prescribing, overprescribing, othering, prescriber attitudes, treatment failure, pig welfare
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Anti-Infective Agents, Decision Making, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Utilization, United Kingdom, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Swine, Swine Diseases, Veterinary Medicine, Veterinarians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review