The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to the Circular Economy – Integration of Perspectives and Domains
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable development requires disruptive changes and radical innovations, and the capability to deliver this in relation to adapt to a sustainable development is needed in mature large industrial companies. Integration between sustainability and business development is needed, which the Circular Economy model offers. Circular Economy is little implemented in practice, and in the present paper barriers to a transition to Circular Economy is identified. Barriers are financial, structural, operational, attitudinal and technological. They are also, as analyzed in relation to innovation management, characterized by a need to increase integration between a number of different perspectives and domains in industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131009 · Cited by 6,477
Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.022 · Cited by 979
Cited by
Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU)
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · Cited by 1,903
Jabbour, C. J. C., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Sarkis, J., & Filho, M. G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.010 · Cited by 576
Bio-based fertilizers: A practical approach towards circular economy
Chojnacka, K., Moustakas, K., & Witek-Krowiak, A. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122223 · Cited by 545
Digitalisation as an Enabler of Circular Economy
Antikainen, M., Uusitalo, T., & Kivikytö-Reponen, P. (2018) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.027 · Cited by 532
Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management
Mahpour, A. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritzén, S., & Sandström, G. Ö.
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 64
- Pages
- 7-12
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2620588134
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 78.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers to the Circular Economy – Integration of Perspectives and Domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005
- The paper
- Ritzén, S., & Sandström, G. Ö. (2017). Barriers to the Circular Economy – Integration of Perspectives and Domains. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
