The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management
Abstract
Abstract Construction and demolition (CD ineffective CD and using finitely recyclable construction materials are ranked first. Also from an aggregate perspective, agency and ownership issues in C&D waste management, lack of integration of sustainable C&D waste management, and uncertain aftermaths of moving toward circular economy in C&D waste management are three high priority barriers which should be removed before transforming current linear economy to circular economy in C&D waste management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
Chen, C.-T. (2000) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00377-1 · Cited by 3,844
Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework
Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.055 · Cited by 1,169
Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights
Wang, T.-C., & Lee, H.-D. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035 · Cited by 967
A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection
Lima Junior, F. R., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti, L. C. R. (2014) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014 · Cited by 820
Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017 · Cited by 674
Barriers to the Circular Economy – Integration of Perspectives and Domains
Ritzén, S., & Sandström, G. Ö. (2017) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 · Cited by 629
Characterizing the generation and flows of construction and demolition waste in China
Zheng, L., Wu, H., Zhang, H., Duan, H., Wang, J., Jiang, W., Dong, B., Liu, G., Zuo, J., & Song, Q. (2017) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.055 · Cited by 535
Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., Henclik, A., Gorazda, K., & Wzorek, Z. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.051 · Cited by 487
Zavadskas, E. K., Mardani, A., Turskis, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016) · International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making · doi:10.1142/s0219622016300019 · Cited by 485
Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: important lessons for the upcoming circular economy
Singh, J., & Ordoñez, I. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.020 · Cited by 467
Cited by
López Ruiz, L. A., Roca Ramón, X., & Gassó Domingo, S. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119238 · Cited by 538
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., Malesios, C., & Dey, P. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495 · Cited by 459
Giorgi, S., Lavagna, M., Wang, K., Osmani, M., Liu, G., & Campioli, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130395 · Cited by 346
Construction and built environment in circular economy: A comprehensive literature review
Çimen, Ö. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127180 · Cited by 269
Kazancoglu, I., Kazancoglu, Y., Yarimoglu, E., & Kahraman, A. (2020) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.2100 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahpour, A.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 134
- Pages
- 216-227
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794940393
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 24.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026
- The paper
- Mahpour, A. (2018). Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
