The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Residual Stress in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has been widely used to fabricate functional metal parts in automobile, aerospace, energy, and medical device industries due to its flexible process capacity including complex geometry, functional graded materials, and free usage of tool. For the two major categories of metal additive manufacturing processes include powder bed fusion (PBF) and directed energy deposition (DED), parts are fabricated through melting of feed stock materials in the form of either powders or wires directly from a CAD model. The unique thermal cycle of metal additive manufacturing is characterized by: (1) rapid heating rate due to high energy intensity with steep temperature gradients; (2) rapid solidification with high cooling rates due to the small volume of melt pool; and (3) melt-back involving simultaneous melting of the top powder layer and re-melting of underlying previously solidified layers. Residual stress caused by the unique thermal cycle in AM is the critical issue for the fabricated metal parts since the steep residual stress gradients generate part distortion which dramatically deteriorate functionality of the end-use parts. This paper comprehensively assessed the current research status on residual stress sources, characteristics, and mitigation. First, the relationship between residual stress and microstructure is highlighted in AM metal parts. Then, the measurement methods and characteristics of residual stress in both as-build metal parts and post-processed ones were summarized. Third, residual stress mitigation and control methods including in-situ and post-process control methods were thoroughly discussed. Furthermore, future work directions are provided in this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties
DebRoy, T., Wei, H. L., Zuback, J. S., Mukherjee, T., Elmer, J. W., Milewski, J. O., Beese, A. M., Wilson-Heid, A., De, A., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 · Cited by 8,805
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting
Mercelis, P., & Kruth, J. (2006) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/13552540610707013 · Cited by 2,015
Vrancken, B., Thijs, L., Kruth, J.-P., & Van Humbeeck, J. (2012) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.07.022 · Cited by 1,896
Metal Fabrication by Additive Manufacturing Using Laser and Electron Beam Melting Technologies
Murr, L. E., Gaytan, S. M., Ramirez, D. A., Martinez, E., Hernandez, J., Amato, K. N., Shindo, P. W., Medina, F. R., & Wicker, R. B. (2012) · Journal of Materials Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s1005-0302(12)60016-4 · Cited by 1,686
Residual stress. Part 1 – Measurement techniques
Withers, P. J., & Bhadeshia, H. K. D. H. (2001) · Materials Science and Technology · doi:10.1179/026708301101509980 · Cited by 1,620
Selective laser melting of iron-based powder
Kruth, J. P., Froyen, L., Van Vaerenbergh, J., Mercelis, P., Rombouts, M., & Lauwers, B. (2004) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.051 · Cited by 1,550
Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing
Everton, S. K., Hirsch, M., Stravroulakis, P., Leach, R. K., & Clare, A. T. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 · Cited by 1,469
Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping
Kruth, J.-P., Leu, M. C., & Nakagawa, T. (1998) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63240-5 · Cited by 1,331
Vilaro, T., Colin, C., & Bartout, J. D. (2011) · Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A · doi:10.1007/s11661-011-0731-y · Cited by 1,283
Cited by
Svetlizky, D., Das, M., Zheng, B., Vyatskikh, A. L., Bose, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Schoenung, J. M., Lavernia, E. J., & Eliaz, N. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.020 · Cited by 1,371
State of the Art in Directed Energy Deposition: From Additive Manufacturing to Materials Design
Dass, A., & Moridi, A. (2019) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings9070418 · Cited by 667
An overview of residual stresses in metal powder bed fusion
Bartlett, J. L., & Li, X. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.020 · Cited by 616
Heat treatment for metal additive manufacturing
Laleh, M., Sadeghi, E., Revilla, R. I., Chao, Q., Haghdadi, N., Hughes, A. E., Xu, W., De Graeve, I., Qian, M., Gibson, I., et al. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101051 · Cited by 538
Application of Directed Energy Deposition-Based Additive Manufacturing in Repair
Saboori, A., Aversa, A., Marchese, G., Biamino, S., Lombardi, M., & Fino, P. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9163316 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C., Liu, Z. Y., Fang, X. Y., & Guo, Y. B.
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 348-353
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2807389414
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 29.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residual Stress in Metal Additive Manufacturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.039
- The paper
- Li, C., Liu, Z. Y., Fang, X. Y., & Guo, Y. B. (2018). Residual Stress in Metal Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
