Cited by 28Elasticity and Material ModelingCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics

Finite Element Modeling and Simulation of Arteries in the Human Arm to Study the Aortic Pulse Wave Propagation

Open access
Choudhari, Pranali, Panse, M.S.·2016·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

Finite modelling and simulation of the arterial network in the human arm has been presented in this paper with an objective to study the aortic pulse wave propagation. In the biomedical domain, it becomes extremely essential to understand the propagation of the aortic pulse along the arterial network, to get a better insight about the functioning of the cardiovascular system. This would assist in haemodynamic measurements, diagnosing disorders and visualizing the effect of medical treatment. The fluid structure interaction has been simulated using COMSOL Multiphysics 4.4 with an objective to obtain the pressure, velocity profile of the aortic pulse and wall shear stresses at the ascending aorta, carotid, brachial, interosseous, ulnar and radial artery. The arterial walls are considered flexible and pulsatile pressure pulse has been used as boundary condition. The validity of the finite element simulation has been supported by comparing the numerical results to the standard published results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.277

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Marieb, Elaine Nicpon, and Katja Hoehn, Human anatomy & physiology, 5 th ed., Pearson Education, 2007.
  2. Khurana, Indu , Textbook of human physiology for dental students,2 nd ed., Elsevier Health Sciences, 2014.
  3. Tortora, Gerard J., Derrickson, Bryan, The Cardiovascular System: Blood Vessels and Hemodynamics, in Principles of Anatomy & Physiology (13th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choudhari, P., & Panse, M. S.
Corresponding author
Choudhari, Pranali
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016
Volume
93
Pages
721-727
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515614525
Cited by
28
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.67
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Keywords
arterial networks, fluid-structure interaction, wall shear stress, hemodynamics, ascending aorta, carotid artery, brachial artery, interosseous artery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review