Cited by 25Scientific Computing and Data ManagementSemantic Web and OntologiesData Visualization and Analytics

A Framework for Provenance Analysis and Visualization

Open access
Oliveira, Weiner, Ambrósio, Lenitta M., Braga, Regina, Ströele, Victor, David, José Maria, Campos, Fernanda·2017·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

Data provenance is a fundamental concept in scientific experimentation. However, for their proper understanding and use, efficient and user-friendly mechanisms are needed. Research in software visualization, ontologies and complex networks can help in this process. This paper presents a framework to assist in the understanding and use of data provenance using visualization techniques, ontologies and complex networks. The framework capture the provenance data and generates new information using ontologies and provenance graph analysis. The graph is analyzed through complex networks techniques and provide some metrics to help in each node analyzes. The visualization presents and highlights the inferences and results. The framework was used in the E-SECO scientific ecosystem to support the scientific experimentation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.216

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One categorisation of provenance mechanisms entails two categories: disclosed and observed provenance.

    “One categorisation of provenance mechanisms entails two categories [24]: disclosed and observed provenance.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Madelaine D Boyd. Inprov: visualizing provenance graphs with radial layouts and time-based hierarchical grouping. Harvard College Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2012.
  2. Linus Karsai. Clustering Provenance. PhD thesis, University of Sydney, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliveira, W., Ambrósio, L. M., Braga, R., Ströele, V., David, J. M., & Campos, F.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
Corresponding author
  • Oliveira, Weiner
  • Ambrósio, Lenitta M.
  • Braga, Regina
  • Ströele, Victor
  • David, José Maria
  • Campos, Fernanda
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
108
Pages
1592-1601
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2622407287
Cited by
25
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9
FWCI
9.33
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
data provenance, provenance visualization, ontology (information science), complex networks, network metrics, scientific experimentation, software visualization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review