Cited by 208Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsECG Monitoring and Analysis

Diagnosis of heart disease using genetic algorithm based trained recurrent fuzzy neural networks

Open access
Uyar, Kaan, İlhan, Ahmet·2017·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated one third of all global deaths reason as cardiovascular diseases in 2015. Some computational techniques were proposed for investigation of heart diseases. This study proposes a genetic algorithm (GA) based trained recurrent fuzzy neural networks (RFNN) to diagnosis of heart diseases. The University of California Irvine (UCI) Cleveland heart disease dataset is used in this study. Out of total 297 instances of patient data, 252 are used for training and 45 of them are chosen to be the testing. The results showed that 97.78% accuracy was obtained from testing set. In addition to the accuracy, root mean square error, the probability of the misclassification error, specificity, sensitivity, precision and F-score are calculated. The results were found to be satisfying based on comparison.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.283

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Uyar, K., 2006. Modeling and Simulation of NiCd Batteries Behaviour Under Fast Charging with Genetic Algorithm Based Trained Recurrent Fuzzy Neural Network. Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Application of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing (ICAFS2006), Siegen, Germany. 247-255

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uyar, K., & İlhan, A.
Affiliations
Near East University (CY)
Corresponding author
Uyar, Kaan
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
120
Pages
588-593
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774583472
Cited by
208
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6
FWCI
17.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
heart disease diagnosis, recurrent fuzzy neural network, genetic algorithm, cardiovascular disease, medical classification, fuzzy logic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review