Cited by 394Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsData Mining and Machine Learning Applications

Association rule mining to detect factors which contribute to heart disease in males and females

Nahar, Jesmin, Imam, Tasadduq, Tickle, Kevin S., Chen, Yi-Ping Phoebe·2013·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.028

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nahar, J., Imam, T., Tickle, K. S., & Chen, Y.-P. P.
Affiliations
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Nahar, Jesmin
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
1086-1093
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080084655
Cited by
394
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
heart disease, coronary artery disease, association rule mining, gender differences, risk factors, Cleveland heart disease dataset, Apriori algorithm, chest pain, exercise-induced angina, resting ECG, heart disease prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review