The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital Transformation Process and SMEs
Open accessAbstract
The process of digital transformation is a period in which entities, universities, public and employees are transformed and; new business models and business practices are formed. Digital transformation is a functional use of web in design, manufacturing, marketing, selling, promotion and is data-oriented management model. Therefore, capabilities of firms are increased and their processes are improved. Digital technologies are developments regarding smartphones, cloud computing, big data, artificial intelligence, robotics systems, internet of things, 3D printing, virtualization, cyber security, sensor technologies, advanced robotics systems, automation and etc. which all is intensely used in many fields of economic and social life.SME’s consist of 99,83 % total enterprises, and 72,7 % of total employment, 50,6 % of total value added and provide 55,1 % of export, take an important role in economy. They should transform their organizational structures and business making cultures starting from manufacturing technologies to management percepts as to get a productive digital transformation process. The fact that SME’s being able to perform cost-benefit analysis of digital technologies and being aware of that technologies is significant.This paper provides a comprehensive view of the factors affecting digital transformation process and describes the digital transformation of the manufacturing sector in Turkey.The programs and softwares that SMEs can use to perform digital transformation, and can benefit from it, are explained. Empirical studies on SMEs shows that SMEs have erratic behaviors in terms of information and communications technology (ICT) investment and need external support to integrate digital transformations in the overall strategy of the firm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Digital transformation of business models-best practice, enablers, and roadmap
SCHALLMO, D., WILLIAMS, C. A., & BOARDMAN, L. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s136391961740014x · Cited by 655
Cited by
Maturity Assessment for Industry 5.0: A Review of Existing Maturity Models
Hein-Pensel, F., Winkler, H., Brückner, A., Wölke, M., Jabs, I., Mayan, I. J., Kirschenbaum, A., Friedrich, J., & Zinke-Wehlmann, C. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.009 · Cited by 215
Drydakis, N. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10249-6 · Cited by 180
Interactive components of digital MSMEs ecosystem for inclusive digital economy in Indonesia
Aminullah, E., Fizzanty, T., Nawawi, N., Suryanto, J., Pranata, N., Maulana, I., Ariyani, L., Wicaksono, A., Suardi, I., Azis, N. L. L., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-022-01086-8 · Cited by 74
Impact of Digitalization on SME Performance of the EU27: Panel Data Analysis
Kádárová, J., Lachvajderová, L., & Sukopová, D. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15139973 · Cited by 50
Jing, H., Zhang, Y., & Ma, J. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21020 · Cited by 35
Al- Qaruty, T. M., Dabbaghia, M. N., Shaban, E. A., & Al -Doori, J. (2022) · International journal of health sciences · doi:10.53730/ijhs.v6ns7.12800 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ulas, D.
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 158
- Pages
- 662-671
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982215825
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 71.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.