The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business model development concept for SMEs in the era of twin transition
Open accessAbstract
The urgent need to act against climate change is emphasized in many initiatives, such as the Sustainable Development Goals, the European Green Deal, and the Circular Economy Action Plan. The role of the industrial sector is crucial. Companies, however, have to operate in a very complex environment driven by digitization and are supposed to be more sustainable. This paper explores how companies can implement the ecological transformation, with a focus on the role of digital technologies and data in enabling the twin transition. This paper proposes an approach to support SMEs in the twin transition through a combination of digital and sustainable business model development. The concept includes an interdisciplinary methodology that combines qualitative and quantitative approaches, focusing on the latter. The suggested method collection includes adaptations of the business model canvas, value proposition analysis, data-driven decision-making, and the integration of environmental and economic considerations using the system of environmental-economic accounting. In particular, approaches to define the quantification of economic as well as ecological value will be key levers for sustainable implementation. By leveraging these approaches, SMEs can navigate the challenges of digital transformation and sustainability and contribute to a more sustainable future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“innovations in environmentally friendly technologies are also important, including clean production processes that use environmentally friendly raw materials and produce minimal waste, as well as efficient waste management technologies.”
From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Gallina et al., 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Innovation for the sustainability of SMEs by emphasizing the importance of dual transition, namely digital transition and green transition”
From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Gallina et al., 2024
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“For example, with the increasing demand for digital products and internet-based solutions, SMEs developing mobile applications or online platforms for their products and services can reach a wider audience and provide a better customer experience (Gallina et al., 2024).”
From Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2025) · cites this paper as Gallina et al., 2024
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinner, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P. W., Trisos, C., Romero, J., Aldunce, P., Barret, K., Blanco, G., et al. (2023) · IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. · doi:10.59327/ipcc/ar6-9789291691647.001 · Cited by 1,581
Reducing Remanufacturing Uncertainties with the Digital Product Passport
Gallina, V., Gal, B., Szaller, Á., Bachlechner, D., Ilie-Zudor, E., & Sihn, W. (2023) · Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28839-5_7 · Cited by 22
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- M. Ghobakhloo, M. Iranmanesh, A. Grybauskas, M. Vilkas, M. Petraite˙, Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation.
- van Erp, 2023, Design and operations framework for the twin transition of manufacturing systems, Andvances in Production engingeering and Management, 18, 92
- S. Muench, E. Stoermer, K. Jensen, T. Asikainen, M. Salvi, F. Scapoo, Towards a green & digital future: Key requirements for successful twin transitions in the european union. doi:10.2760/977331. · DOI
- Toth-Peter, 2023, Industry 4.0 as an enabler in transitioning to circular business models: A systematic literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 393, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136284 · DOI
- Bachmann, 2022, The contribution of data-driven technologies in achieving the sustainable development goals, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14
- Masood, 2020, Industry 4.0: Adoption challenges and benefts for smes, Computers in Industry, 121, 10.1016/j.compind.2020.103261 · DOI
- Onu, 2021, Industry 4.0 opportunities in manufacturing smes: Sustainability outlook, Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 1925
- Halme, 2014, Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises: A resource perspective, Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 547, 10.1002/bse.1801 · DOI
- Omri, 2023, To go or to not go green for smes: Toward the twinning effect of ecodesign practices and radical innovativeness on same performance, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1
- Utaminingsih, 2023, Sustainable business model innovation: external and internal factors on smes, International Journal of Innovation Science
- Rodrigues, 2023, Green innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (smes): A qualitative approach, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15
- Stawicka, 2021, Sustainable development in the digital age of entrepreneurship, Sustainability (Switzerland), 13
- S. Maulidah, A. Wahib Muhaimin, Sustainable business models: Challenges on potato agro-industry smes, Vol. 709, 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/709/1/012082. · DOI
- Chen, 2021, Business model innovation and growth of manufacturing smes: a social exchange perspective, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 3, 290, 10.1108/JMTM-03-2020-0089 · DOI
- Mangers, 2023, Digital twin of end-of-life process-chains for a circular economy adapted product design – a case study on pet bottles, Journal of Cleaner Production, 382, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135287 · DOI
- Meshulam, 2023, Sharing economy rebound: The case of peer-to-peer sharing of food waste, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3, 882, 10.1111/jiec.13319 · DOI
- Alfarisi, 2023, Nurture: A novel approach to pss-rebound effect identification, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15
- Joyce, 2016, [duplikat] the triple layered business model canvas: A tool to design more sustainable business models, Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1474, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.067 · DOI
- J. Pollard, M. Osmani, S. Grubnic, A. I. Díaz, K. Grobe, A. Kaba, Ö. Ünlüer, R. Panchal, Implementing a circular economy business model canvas in the electrical and electronic manufacturing sector: A case study approach, Sustainable Production and Consumption 36 (2023) 17–31. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.009. · DOI
- Konietzko, 2023, Towards regenerative business models: A necessary shift?, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 38, 372, 10.1016/j.spc.2023.04.014 · DOI
- Mendoza, 2022, Circular economy business models and technology management strategies in the wind industry: Sustainability potential, industrial challenges and opportunities, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 163, 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112523 · DOI
- J. F. Montenegro, P. A. Contreras, F. Sáenz, Hybridization of the kano model and business model canvas: aeronautical and metalworking industry in bogota, colombia, Heliyon 7 (10) (2021) e08097. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08097. · DOI
- Moure Abelenda, 2023, Adapted business model canvas template and primary market research for project-based learning on management ofslurry, Environmental Technology & Innovation, 30, 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103106 · DOI
- Brunner, 2020, Virtual reality enriched business model canvas building blocks for enhancing customer retention, Procedia Manufacturing, 42, 154, 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.062 · DOI
- Strulak-Wójcikiewicz, 2020, Applying the business model canvas to design the e-platform for sailing tourism, Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1643, 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.188 · DOI
- Schaltegger, 2015, Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues, Organization & Environment, 29, 3, 10.1177/1086026615599806 · DOI
- Tukker, 2015, Product services for a resource-efcient and circular economy – a review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.049 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, 2023, From technology enablers to circular economy: Data-driven understanding of the overview of servitization and product–service systems in industry 4.0, Computers in Industry, 148, 10.1016/j.compind.2023.103908 · DOI
- Meierhofer, 2022, On the value of data: multi-objective maximization of value creation in data-driven industrial services, IEEE
- Takacs, 2022, Barriers to a circular economy in small...ainable strategic management framework, Journal of Cleaner Production, 362, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132227 · DOI
- 2014, United Nations, System of environmental-economic accounting: Experimental ecosystem accounting, United Nations
- Cardoni, 2020, In search of sustainable value: A structured literature review, Sustainability, 12, 615, 10.3390/su12020615 · DOI
- Jäger-Roschko, 2022, Advancing the circular economy through information sharing: A systematic literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 369, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133210 · DOI
- Khademi, 2020, Ecosystem value creation and capture: A systematic review of literature and potential research opportunities, Technology Innovation Management Review, 10, 16, 10.22215/timreview/1311 · DOI
- Kumar, 2022, Impact of cybersecurity on operations and supply chain management: Emerging trends and future research directions, Production and Operations Management, 31, 4488, 10.1111/poms.13859 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Innovation as A Driver of SMEs Sustainability: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Latifannisa, N., Wardi, Y., & Marwan (2025) · BASKARA: Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.54268/baskara.v7i2.26926 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallina, V., Steinwender, A., Zudor, E., Preuveneers, D., & Schlund, S.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Austria (AT)
- IMEC (BE)
- TU Wien (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Gallina, Viola
- Venue
- Procedia Computer Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 232
- Pages
- 523-532
- ISSN
- 1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392975004
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 26.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- reposiTUm (TU Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- SZTAKI Publication Repository (Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
- Bundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie (891793)
- KU Leuven
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (739592.)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Keywords
- twin transition, business model development, small and medium-sized enterprises, digital transformation, sustainability, ecological transformation, circular economy, business model canvas, data-driven decision making, environmental-economic accounting, climate change mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review