CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 244Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceSustainable Building Design and AssessmentBIM and Construction Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Design for Disassembly and Deconstruction - Challenges and Opportunities

Open access
Rios, Fernanda Cruz, Chong, Wai K., Grau, David·2015·Procedia Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Construction waste management has become extremely important due to stricter disposal and landfill regulations, and a lesser number of available landfills. There are extensive works done on waste treatment and management of the construction industry. Concepts like deconstruction, recyclability, and Design for Disassembly (DfD) are examples of better construction waste management methods. Although some authors and organizations have published rich guides addressing the DfD's principles, there are only a few buildings already developed in this area. This study aims to find the challenges in the current practice of deconstruction activities and the gaps between its theory and implementation. Furthermore, it aims to provide insights about how DfD can create opportunities to turn these concepts into strategies that can be largely adopted by the construction industry stakeholders in the near future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. B. Guy, S. Shell, Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, in A.R. Chini & F. Schultmann, Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse: Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 – Deconstruction Meeting, CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand, 2002.
  2. W. McDonough, M. Braungart, Cradle to Cradle: remarking the way we make things, first ed., North Point Press, 2002.
  3. C. Thormark, Assessing the Recycling Potential in Buildings, in A.R. Chini, Design Deconstruction and Materials Reuse – Technology, Economic, and Policy: Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 – Deconstruction Meeting, CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand, 2001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–244 of 244

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rios, F. C., Chong, W. K., & Grau, D.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rios, Fernanda Cruz
ORCID
Venue
Procedia Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015
Volume
118
Pages
1296-1304
ISSN
1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.485
OpenAlex
W2241574490
Cited by
235
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Procedia Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
Keywords
design for disassembly, deconstruction, construction waste management, recyclability, building demolition, landfill regulation, construction industry stakeholders, theory-practice gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review