The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design for Disassembly and Deconstruction - Challenges and Opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Construction waste management has become extremely important due to stricter disposal and landfill regulations, and a lesser number of available landfills. There are extensive works done on waste treatment and management of the construction industry. Concepts like deconstruction, recyclability, and Design for Disassembly (DfD) are examples of better construction waste management methods. Although some authors and organizations have published rich guides addressing the DfD's principles, there are only a few buildings already developed in this area. This study aims to find the challenges in the current practice of deconstruction activities and the gaps between its theory and implementation. Furthermore, it aims to provide insights about how DfD can create opportunities to turn these concepts into strategies that can be largely adopted by the construction industry stakeholders in the near future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, DfD principles in 130 buildings have not turned into established practices yet (Rios et al., 2015)”
From Design strategies to increase the reuse of wood materials in buildings: Lessons from architectural practice (2022) · cites this paper as Rios et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery
Kibert, C. J. (2005) · Cited by 1,098
Characterization of building-related construction and demolition debris in the United States
Response, E., & Associates, F. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 202
Understanding transportation energy and technical metabolism of construction waste recycling
Chong, W. K., & Hermreck, C. (2009) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.10.015 · Cited by 59
Self-citationWebster, M. D., Gumpertz, S., & Costello, D. T. (2005) · Cited by 56
DECONSTRUCTION AS AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION
Kibert, C. J., Chini, A. R., & Languell, J. (2001) · Cited by 55
Srour, I., Chong, W. K., & Zhang, F. (2010) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.493 · Cited by 47
Self-citationWebster, M. D. (2007) · doi:10.1061/40946(248)27 · Cited by 39
Concepts for Reuse and Recycling of Construction and Demolition Waste
Dolan, P. J., Lampo, R., & Dearborn, J. C. (1999) · doi:10.21236/ada368252 · Cited by 37
Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials in Germany
Kühlen, A., Thompson, N., & Schultmann, F. (2014) · Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) · doi:10.5445/ir/1000052698 · Cited by 33
Guy, B. (2006) · Journal of Green Building · doi:10.3992/jgb.1.1.102 · Cited by 23
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 13 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- B. Guy, S. Shell, Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse, in A.R. Chini & F. Schultmann, Design for Deconstruction and Materials Reuse: Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 – Deconstruction Meeting, CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand, 2002.
- W. McDonough, M. Braungart, Cradle to Cradle: remarking the way we make things, first ed., North Point Press, 2002.
- C. Thormark, Assessing the Recycling Potential in Buildings, in A.R. Chini, Design Deconstruction and Materials Reuse – Technology, Economic, and Policy: Proceedings of the CIB Task Group 39 – Deconstruction Meeting, CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand, 2001.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ibn-Mohammed, T., Mustapha, K. B., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z. A., Babatunde, K. A., Akintade, D. D., Acquaye, A. A., Fujii, H., Ndiaye, M., Yamoah, F. A., et al. (2020) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169 · Cited by 974
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207 · Cited by 706
Guerra, B. C., & Leite, F. L. (2021) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105617 · Cited by 404
Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy
Eberhardt, L. C. M., Birkved, M., & Birgisdóttir, H. (2020) · Architectural Engineering and Design Management · doi:10.1080/17452007.2020.1781588 · Cited by 359
Disassembly and deconstruction analytics system (D-DAS) for construction in a circular economy
Akanbi, L., Oyedele, L. O., Omoteso, K., Bilal, M., Akinadé, O. O., Ajayi, A., Delgado, J. M. D., & Owolabi, H. A. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.172 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Rios, F. C., Chong, W. K., & Grau, D.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rios, Fernanda Cruz
- Venue
- Procedia Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 118
- Pages
- 1296-1304
- ISSN
- 1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2241574490
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Keywords
- design for disassembly, deconstruction, construction waste management, recyclability, building demolition, landfill regulation, construction industry stakeholders, theory-practice gap
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
