The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The construction industry is facing many challenges including low productivity, poor regulation and compliance, lack of adequate collaboration and information sharing, and poor payment practices. Advances in distributed ledger technologies (DLT), also referred to as Blockchain, are increasingly investigated as one of the constituents in the digital transformation of the construction industry and its response to these challenges. The overarching aim of this study was to analyse the current state of DLT in the built environment and the construction sector with a view to developing a coherent approach to support its adoption specifically in the construction industry. Three objectives were established to achieve this: (a) to present the first state-of-the-art and literature review on DLT in the built environment and construction industry providing a consolidated view of the applications explored and potential use cases that could support disruption of the construction industry. Seven use-categories were identified: [1] Smart Energy, [2] Smart Cities & the Sharing Economy, [3] Smart Government, [4] Smart Homes, [5] Intelligent Transport, [6] BIM and Construction Management, and [7] Business Models and Organisational Structures; (b) to propose a framework for implementation composed of two conceptual models (i.e. the DLT Four-Dimensional Model, and the DLT Actors Model), developed according to extended socio-technical systems theory and including four dimensions (technical, social, process and policy), to support the development of DLT-based solutions that are adequate to the challenges faced by the construction industry. The DLT Four-Dimensional Model and the DLT Actors Model contribute to improve the understanding of the concepts involved when discussing DLT applications in construction and represent flexible, adaptable and scalable knowledge constructs and foundations that can be used for various further investigations; and (c) to appraise three specific use cases (i.e. Project Bank Accounts, regulation and compliance, and a single shared-access BIM model) as potential areas for DLT through the application of a decision support tool. The results show that Project Bank Accounts (PBAs) and regulation and compliance are candidate areas for DLT applications and warrant further attention. However, for the third use case (i.e. single shared-access BIM model) DLT are still insufficiently developed at this time. The research shows that there is real potential for DLT to support digitalisation in the construction industry and enable solutions to many of its challenges. However, there needs to be further investigation of the readiness of the industry, its organisations and processes, and to evaluate what changes need to occur before implementation can be successful. Further investigations will include the development of a roadmap process incorporating the four dimensions to evaluate readiness across a series of use cases for the construction industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems
Geels, F. W. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 · Cited by 4,098
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675100400101 · Cited by 3,379
Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomw.2017.7917634 · Cited by 1,843
Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.007 · Cited by 1,107
BlockChain: A Distributed Solution to Automotive Security and Privacy
Dorri, A., Steger, M., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700879 · Cited by 807
Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems
Yuan, Y., & Wang, F.-Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2016.7795984 · Cited by 671
Blockchains everywhere - a use-case of blockchains in the pharma supply-chain
Bocek, T., Rodrigues, B. B., Strasser, T., & Stiller, B. (2017) · 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM) · doi:10.23919/inm.2017.7987376 · Cited by 585 · cited 2×
“Bandwidth & connectivity Sufficient server capacity required for stability of the system along with continuous internet connectivity (Bocek et al., 2017; Kshetri, 2017).”
BackgroundBlockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities
Sun, J., Yan, J., & Zhang, K. Z. K. (2016) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-016-0040-y · Cited by 552
Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary?
Atzori, M. (2016) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2709713 · Cited by 506
Cebe, M., Erdin, E., Akkaya, K., Aksu, H., & Uluagac, S. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1800137 · Cited by 326
Cited by
Digital twin: values, challenges and enablers from a modeling perspective
Rasheed, A., San, O., & Kvamsdal, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2970143 · Cited by 1,952
Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review
Opoku, D.-G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726 · Cited by 753
Public and private blockchain in construction business process and information integration
Yang, R., Wakefield, R., Lyu, S., Jayasuriya, S., Han, F., Yi, X., Yang, X., Amarasinghe, G., & Chen, S. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103276 · Cited by 490
Blockchain-Enabled Information Sharing Within a Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review
Wan, P. K., Huang, L., & Holtskog, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2980142 · Cited by 160
Exploratory literature review of blockchain in the construction industry
Scott, D. J., Broyd, T., & Ma, L. (2021) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103914 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Greenwood, D., & Kassem, M.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 288-307
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921359895
- Cited by
- 665
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.005
- The paper
- Li, J., Greenwood, D., & Kassem, M. (2019). Blockchain in the built environment and construction industry: A systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.02.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.