Model updating for structural health monitoring using static and dynamic measurements
Open accessAbstract
Structural health monitoring is tracking static or dynamic characteristics of a structure to identify and localize stiffness reductions for damage detection. Different damage indicators are used and any indicator presents advantages and drawbacks. Hence the idea comes up to combine them in a model-updating procedure using a finite element model. In a first step, a model is fit to match the healthy reference state of the examined structure. Therefore it relies on minimizing a special objective function adding and weighting the differences between measured and calculated static and dynamic structural characteristics. For doing structural health monitoring the measurements are repeated in distinct time intervals and the finite element model is updated again, using the same objective function and minimization procedure. Damage can be identified and localized by highlighting reductions in the stiffness matrix of the model compared to the initial model. The efficiency of the method is illustrated by in-situ tests, where a single beam is examined that was part of a real prestressed concrete bridge. For static tests, 8 displacement transducers were disposed along the length of 40m, while the beam was mass-loaded and the deflection line is analyzed. Modal analysis was performed with swept sine excitation with constant force amplitude to identify eigenfrequencies and mode shapes. Stepwise artificial damage was provoked by cutting multiple prestressed tendons inside the concrete beam. A finite element model with a mapped mesh was created, allowing a variation of Young’s modulus in grouped sections. On real bridges temperature is neither homogenous nor constant over time, which often has a considerable influence on measured static and dynamic characteristics as the stiffness of asphalt and/or bearings can be affected. The proposed methods show their efficiency when temperature effects were excluded or compensated after measurement, which is a topic on its own and not discussed here.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mass loadings, such as traffic, can introduce challenges to SHM techniques as an operational variable.
“Mass loadings, such as traffic, can introduce challenges to SHM techniques as another operational variable.Several papers on SHM have studied the effects of mass loading on the measured signals from SHM systems [127,128].”
From Effects of Environmental and Operational Conditions on Structural Health Monitoring and Non-Destructive Testing: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [127]
Section 3.1 (p. 4) describes traffic-like mass loads applied to the beam, and Section 3.3 (p. 5) reports differences in measured deflection between loaded and unloaded states. This supports the point that mass loading affects SHM measurements, but the paper uses controlled loading as part of its tests; it does not characterize traffic loading as an operational variable that challenges SHM techniques. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Braun, W. J., & Murdoch, D. J. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108993456.011 · Cited by 14,099 · see citing works
Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual
Jaishi, B., & Ren, W. (2005) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2005.04.006 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Damage assessment by FE model updating using damage functions
Teughels, A., Maeck, J., & Roeck, G. D. (2002) · Computers & Structures · doi:10.1016/s0045-7949(02)00217-1 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Schlune, H., Plos, M., & Gylltoft, K. (2009) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.011 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
DAMAGE ASSESSMENT USING MODE SHAPE SENSITIVITIES
Parloo, E., Guillaume, P., & Overmeire, M. V. (2003) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1006/mssp.2001.1429 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Static load testing with temperature compensation for structural health monitoring of bridges
Nguyen, V. H., Schommer, S., Maas, S., et al. (2016) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.018 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationZong, Z., Lin, X., & Niu, J. (2015) · Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2015.06.001 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Structural Health Monitoring and Model Updating of Aizhai Suspension Bridge
Yu, S. T., & Ou, J. (2016) · Journal of Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)as.1943-5525.0000653 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Hà, N. V., & Golinval, J. (2010) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.012 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The Finite Element Model Updating: A Powerful Tool for Structural Health Monitoring
Mordini, A., Savov, K., & Wenzel, H. (2007) · Structural Engineering International · doi:10.2749/101686607782359010 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
A Substructuring Method for Model Updating and Damage Identification
Xia, Y., Weng, S., & Xu, Y. L. (2011) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.389 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Maas, S., Schommer, S., NGUYEN, V.-H., et al. (2015) · MATEC Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/matecconf/20152405006 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of finite element model updating methods for structural applications
Ereiz, S., Duvnjak, I., & Fernando Jiménez-Alonso, J. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.041 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Keshmiry, A., Hassani, S., Mousavi, M., & Dackermann, U. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13040918 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Sivasuriyan, A., Vijayan, D. S., LeemaRose, A., Revathy, J., Gayathri Monicka, S., Adithya, U. R., & Jebasingh Daniel, J. (2021) · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/2615029 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Retracted
- Authors
- Schommer, S., Nguyen, V. H., Maas, S., & Zürbes, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Luxembourg (LU)
- TH Bingen University of Applied Sciences (DE)
- Venue
- Procedia Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 199
- Pages
- 2146-2153
- ISSN
- 1877-7058 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2754543393
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Procedia Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Keywords
- structural health monitoring, model updating, damage detection, damage localization, stiffness degradation, static measurement, dynamic measurement, finite element model, prestressed concrete bridges, beam deflection, natural frequencies, mode shapes, temperature effects, Young's modulus variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review