Cited by 248Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

Extended implied weighting

Open access
Goloboff, Pablo A.·2014·Cladistics

Abstract

Several extensions to implied weighting, recently implemented in TNT, allow a better treatment of data sets combining morphological and molecular data sets, as well as those comprising large numbers of missing entries (e.g. palaeontological matrices, or combined matrices with some genes sequenced for few taxa). As there have been recent suggestions that molecular matrices may be better analysed using equal weights (rather than implied weighting), a simple way to apply implied weighting to only some characters (e.g. morphology), leaving other characters with a constant weight (e.g. molecules), is proposed. The new methods also allow weighting entire partitions according to their average homoplasy, giving each of the characters in the partition the same weight (this can be used for dynamically weighting, e.g. entire genes, or first, second, and third positions collectively). Such an approach is easily implemented in schemes like successive weighting, but in the case of implied weighting poses some particular problems. The approach has the peculiar implication that the inclusion of uninformative characters influences the results (by influencing the implied weights for the partitions). Last, the concern that characters with many missing entries may receive artificially inflated weights (because they necessarily display less homoplasy) can be solved by allowing the use of different weighting functions for different characters, in such a way that the cost of additional transformations decreases more rapidly for characters with more missing entries (thus effectively assuming that the unobserved entries are likely to also display some unobserved homoplasy). The conceptual and practical aspects of all these problems, as well as details of the implementation in TNT, are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cla.12047

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All analyses included implied weighting (XIW) with modifications that prevent improper inflation of weights due to missing entries.

    “All of our analyses included implied weighting (XIW) [103], with modifications proposed by [104] that prevent improper inflation of weights due to missing entries (downweighting the weight of characters with missing entries faster).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goloboff, P. A.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Goloboff, Pablo A.
Venue
Cladistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-07-19
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
260-272
ISSN
  • 0748-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-0031
OpenAlex
W2049003611
Cited by
248
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cladistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (201101, PIP 112 201101 00687, PIP 112, PIP 112 201101, 112 201101 00687)
  • Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 01314)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
implied weighting, TNT, character weighting, homoplasy, missing data, weight functions, phylogenetic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review