Cited by 17Evaluation and Performance AssessmentHealth Education and ValidationNursing education and management

Systematic review of program evaluation in baccalaureate nursing programs

Al-Alawi, Reem, Alexander, Gregory Lynn·2020·Journal of Professional Nursing

Abstract

Program evaluation is a common practice in nursing education programs; however, evidence indicates that many schools only focus on program evaluation around the scheduled accreditation period, thus reducing the potential value of the evaluation. This systematic review explores the current program evaluation practices of prelicensure baccalaureate nursing programs. ERIC, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were searched to locate original research articles published in English. Twenty articles met the inclusion criteria. The purposes of the evaluated studies varied from needing to meet external accountability requirements to proposing conceptual frameworks and evaluation tools. However, most studies focused on summative evaluation assessing program products and on providing evidence of program evaluation based on descriptive data. Notably, few studies employed a rigorous method to evaluate and interpret program evaluation findings. Most studies solicited information from multiple stakeholder groups, with students being the most represented. Despite the wide range of data collection tools used in the reviewed studies, reporting of validity and reliability was limited. Student grade point average, graduation rate, NCLEX passing rate, and satisfaction with the learning experience were the most common variables. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of current educational program evaluation practices in nursing education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.12.003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Alawi, R., & Alexander, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Professional Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
236-244
ISSN
  • 1532-8481 (ISSN-L)
  • 8755-7223
OpenAlex
W2997560173
Cited by
17
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Professional Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
program evaluation, baccalaureate nursing programs, nursing education, summative assessment, accreditation, stakeholder engagement, student outcomes, graduate outcomes
MeSH terms
Education, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Students, Students, Nursing, Reproducibility of Results, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review