CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200Digital Transformation in IndustryInformation and Cyber SecurityCybersecurity and Information Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Network and information security challenges within Industry 4.0 paradigm

Open access
Pereira, T., Barreto, L., Amaral, A.·2017·Procedia Manufacturing
DOI 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.047
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Currently Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) support most of the industrial manufacturing processes. The IT revolution has brought an important transformation in organizations with high impacts, which are comparable to the mechanization and electricity brought in the first and second industrial revolution. This evolvement has promoted the emergence of cloud-based systems, the Internet of Things (IoT), Big Data, Industry 4.0, BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) and CYOD (Choose Your Own Device) trends. However, new technological solutions always carry security vulnerabilities, which most of time reveal unexpected risks. In fact, with increasing reliance on technology to gain competitive advantage, security issues have been one of the most critical and challenging requirements for conducting successful business. In this paper, it is highlighted some reflections regarding the challenges of Industry 4.0 emphasizing the security issues, towards raising awareness for security good practices within Industry 4.0.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.047

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Industry 4.0, the cooperation of multiple partners such as suppliers in the network makes the task easier for criminals as their attacks can have many pathways and spread very fast.

    “In industry 4.0, the cooperation of multiple partners, such as suppliers in the network, makes the task easier for these criminals as their attacks can have many pathways and spread very fast.”

    From A Review of Cybersecurity Guidelines for Manufacturing Factories in Industry 4.0 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

    The “Supply Chain and the Extended Systems” section says attackers can exploit supplier vulnerabilities and that a vulnerability can reach other organizational processes through dependent actors. The “Enterprise Cyber-Espionage” section also links heightened threats to cooperation among network partners. Neither passage establishes that attacks spread very fast or have many pathways; page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Well organized groups of cyber criminals have made Industry 4.0 their favourite target to steal sensitive information and intellectual property.

    “Well organized groups of cyber criminals have made industry 4.0 their favourite target to steal sensitive information and intellectual property.”

    From A Review of Cybersecurity Guidelines for Manufacturing Factories in Industry 4.0 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

    The 'Enterprise Cyber-Espionage, Confidential Information and Intellectual Property' section (page unavailable) says well-organized cybercriminal groups target specific industries to steal sensitive information and intellectual property. It says Industry 4.0 is more vulnerable to cyber-espionage, but does not say it is those groups’ favourite target. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • The major security threats faced by an Industry 4.0 factory can be classified into categories including cyber espionage, denial-of-service, supply chain and extended systems, and smart security and smart factory.

    “The major security threats faced by an industry 4.0 factory can be classified into the following categories [20]:”

    From A Review of Cybersecurity Guidelines for Manufacturing Factories in Industry 4.0 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

  • Due to smart and connected business processes, Industry 4.0 is vulnerable to cyber espionage.

    “Due to smart and connected business processes, industry 4.0 is vulnerable to cyber espionage.”

    From A Review of Cybersecurity Guidelines for Manufacturing Factories in Industry 4.0 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

  • The theft of corporate and product data is becoming very common, especially software and functionalities that are easy to copy.

    “The theft of corporate and product data is becoming very common, especially the software and functionalities that are easy to copy.”

    From A Review of Cybersecurity Guidelines for Manufacturing Factories in Industry 4.0 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. J. Nasser, Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2014.
  2. A. Varghese, D. Tandur, 2014 International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), 634.
  3. T. Lins, M.J. Silva, R.A.R. Oliveira, Proceedings of the 20th Advanced International Conference on Telecommunications. Valencia, Spain, pp. 34–39, 2016.
  4. Wang, 2016, Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Networks., 12, 10
  5. Byers, 2007, Ind. Ethernet B., 39, 12

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Pereira, T., Barreto, L., & Amaral, A.
Affiliations
Universidade Politécnica de Viana do Castelo (PT)
Corresponding author
Pereira, T.
ORCID
Venue
Procedia Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
13
Pages
1253-1260
ISSN
2351-9789 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.047
OpenAlex
W2763195657
Cited by
200
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Procedia Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/CEC/00319/2013)
  • Programa Operacional Temático Factores de Competitividade (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cybersecurity and Information Systems
Keywords
Industry 4.0, network security, information security, security vulnerabilities, Internet of Things, cloud computing, big data, Bring Your Own Device, security awareness, manufacturing industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review