The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated Process Monitoring in 3D Printing Using Supervised Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
Quality monitoring is still a big challenge in additive manufacturing, popularly known as 3D printing. Detection of defects during the printing process will help eliminate waste of material and time. Defect detection during the initial stages of printing may generate an alert to either pause or stop the printing process so that corrective measures can be taken to prevent the need to reprint the parts. This paper proposes a method to automatically assess the quality of 3D printed parts with the integration of a camera, image processing, and supervised machine learning. Images of semi-finished parts are taken at several critical stages of the printing process according to the part geometry. A machine learning method, support vector machine (SVM), is proposed to classify the parts into either ‘good’ or ‘defective’ category. Parts using ABS and PLA materials were printed to demonstrate the proposed framework. A numerical example is provided to demonstrate how the proposed method works.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis
Breneman, J. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s264 · Cited by 426
Effects of layer thickness and binder saturation level parameters on 3D printing process
Vaezi, M., & Chua, C. K. (2011) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2821-1 · Cited by 341
Wuest, T., Irgens, C., & Thoben, K.-D. (2014) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-013-0761-y · Cited by 243
Improved Surface Quality in 3D Printing by Optimizing the Printing Direction
Wang, W. M., Zanni, C., & Kobbelt, L. P. (2016) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.12811 · Cited by 111
Cited by
An overview of residual stresses in metal powder bed fusion
Bartlett, J. L., & Li, X. (2019) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.02.020 · Cited by 616
Zhu, Z., Ng, D. W. H., Park, H. S., & McAlpine, M. C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-020-00235-2 · Cited by 348
Kumar, S., Gopi, T., Harikeerthana, N., Gupta, M. K., Gaur, V., Krolczyk, G. M., & Wu, C. (2023) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-022-02029-5 · Cited by 328
Machine learning in predicting mechanical behavior of additively manufactured parts
Nasiri, S., & Khosravani, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.004 · Cited by 202
Martín Noguerol, T., Paulano-Godino, F., Martín-Valdivia, M. T., Menias, C. O., & Luna, A. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.047 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Delli, U., & Chang, S.
- Venue
- Procedia Manufacturing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 865-870
- ISSN
- 2351-9789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2886783527
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated Process Monitoring in 3D Printing Using Supervised Machine Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.111
- The paper
- Delli, U., & Chang, S. (2018). Automated Process Monitoring in 3D Printing Using Supervised Machine Learning. Procedia Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.