Cited by 42Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchRespiratory Support and MechanismsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Risk and benefits of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for neonatal and childhood respiratory diseases in Low- and Middle-Income countries

Ekhaguere, Osayame A., Mairami, Amsa B., Kirpalani, Haresh·2019·Paediatric Respiratory Reviews

Abstract

Over 80% of the global burden of childhood deaths occur in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC). Of the leading causes of death, respiratory failure is common to the top three. Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) is a standard therapy considered safe and cost effective in high resource settings. Although high-quality trials from LMIC are few, pooled available trial data considered alongside studies from high-income countries suggest that bCPAP: (i) reduces mortality; (ii) reduces the need for mechanical ventilation; and (iii) prevents extubation failure. Wider availability and optimal use at all levels of the health care system in LMIC are important steps to improve childhood survival. Studies aimed at effectively implementing, and sustaining safe use of bCPAP in the resource limited setting of LMIC are required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prrv.2018.04.004

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekhaguere, O. A., Mairami, A. B., & Kirpalani, H.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • National Hospital Abuja (NG)
Corresponding author
Ekhaguere, Osayame A.
Venue
Paediatric Respiratory Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
29
Pages
31-36
ISSN
1526-0542 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799450995
Cited by
42
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Paediatric Respiratory Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
bubble continuous positive airway pressure, neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, low- and middle-income countries, mortality reduction, extubation failure, mechanical ventilation, resource-limited settings
MeSH terms
Cannula, Child, Preschool, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Developing Countries, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Respiratory Insufficiency, Risk Assessment, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review