Cited by 149Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchRespiratory Support and MechanismsInfant Development and Preterm Care

Efficacy of a low-cost bubble CPAP system in treatment of respiratory distress in a neonatal ward in Malawi

Open access
Kawaza, Kondwani, Machen, Heather E., Brown, Jocelyn, Mwanza, Zondiwe, Iniguez, Suzanne, Gest, Al, Smith, E. O'Brian, Oden, Maria +2 more·2014·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure is a leading cause of neonatal mortality in the developing world. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is a safe, effective intervention for infants with respiratory distress and is widely used in developed countries. Because of its high cost, bCPAP is not widely utilized in low-resource settings. We evaluated the performance of a new bCPAP system to treat severe respiratory distress in a low resource setting, comparing it to nasal oxygen therapy, the current standard of care. METHODS: We conducted a non-randomized convenience sample study to test the efficacy of a low-cost bCPAP system treating newborns with severe respiratory distress in the neonatal ward of Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, in Blantyre, Malawi. Neonates weighing >1,000 g and presenting with severe respiratory distress who fulfilled inclusion criteria received nasal bCPAP if a device was available; if not, they received standard care. Clinical assessments were made during treatment and outcomes compared for the two groups. FINDINGS: 87 neonates (62 bCPAP, 25 controls) were recruited. Survival rate for neonates receiving bCPAP was 71.0% (44/62) compared with 44.0% (11/25) for controls. 65.5% (19/29) of very low birth weight neonates receiving bCPAP survived to discharge compared to 15.4% (1/13) of controls. 64.6% (31/48) of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) receiving bCPAP survived to discharge, compared to 23.5% (4/17) of controls. 61.5% (16/26) of neonates with sepsis receiving bCPAP survived to discharge, while none of the seven neonates with sepsis in the control group survived. INTERPRETATION: Use of a low-cost bCPAP system to treat neonatal respiratory distress resulted in 27% absolute improvement in survival. The beneficial effect was greater for neonates with very low birth weight, RDS, or sepsis. Implementing appropriate bCPAP devices could reduce neonatal mortality in developing countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0086327

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawaza, K., Machen, H. E., Brown, J., Mwanza, Z., Iniguez, S., Gest, A., Smith, E. O., Oden, M., Richards-Kortum, R. R., & Molyneux, E.
Affiliations
  • Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (MW)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Rice University (US)
  • Texas Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Richards-Kortum, Rebecca R.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2014-01-29
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
e86327
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052883659
Cited by
149
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bioline International (Bioline International) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Rice Research Repository (Rice University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development (AIDOAAA1300014)
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (AID-OAA-A-13-00014)
  • World Bank Group
  • Texas Children's Hospital
  • Rice University
  • Grand Challenges Canada (AID-OAA-A-13-00014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
bubble CPAP, neonatal respiratory distress, low-cost medical device, neonatal survival, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, very low birth weight infants, nasal oxygen therapy, resource-limited settings, neonatal mortality, Malawi
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Malawi, Male, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review