Cited by 626Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Substance Use Disorders

Open access
McHugh, R. Kathryn, Hearon, Bridget A., Otto, Michael W.·2010·Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for substance use disorders has shown efficacy as a monotherapy and as part of combination treatment strategies. This article provides a review of the evidence supporting the use of CBT, clinical elements of its application, novel treatment strategies for improving treatment response, and dissemination efforts. Although CBT for substance abuse is characterized by heterogeneous treatment elements such as operant learning strategies, cognitive and motivational elements, and skills-building interventions, across protocols several core elements emerge that focus on overcoming the powerfully reinforcing effects of psychoactive substances. These elements, and support for their efficacy, are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psc.2010.04.012

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 83 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 625

Metadata

Authors
McHugh, R. K., Hearon, B. A., & Otto, M. W.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
McHugh, R. Kathryn
Venue
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
511-525
ISSN
0193-953X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043687030
Cited by
626
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA017904, R01DA017904)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, substance use disorders, addiction treatment, combination therapy, motivation enhancement, treatment response, dissemination of evidence-based treatment
MeSH terms
Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Psychotropic Drugs, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review