Cited by 118Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Predicting conversion to dementia in mild cognitive impairment by volumetric and diffusivity measurements of the hippocampus

Fellgiebel, Andreas, Dellani, Paulo R., Greverus, Dirk, Scheurich, Armin, Stoeter, Peter, Müller, Matthias J.·2006·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

In our prospective study of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), we measured hippocampal mean diffusivity (MD) and volumes in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Thirteen MCI patients were followed-up by clinical assessment over a mean 112-year period. MCI patients who converted to dementia (6 of 13) during the observation period had slightly elevated left hippocampal mean diffusivity at baseline compared with MCI patients who remained clinically stable. Hippocampal volumes as well as baseline verbal memory and MMSE did not differ significantly between stable MCI patients and converters. Hippocampal diffusivity was superior to hippocampal volumes for prediction of conversion to dementia in MCI patients during a 112-year period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2006.01.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some studies, hippocampal diffusivity demonstrated higher diagnostic and prognostic accuracy than hippocampal volume.

    “In some studies, hippocampal diffusivity even demonstrated a higher diagnostic and prognostic accuracy than hippocampal volume (Fellgiebel et al., 2006, Kantarci et al., 2005, Müller et al., 2007).”
  • Previous studies reported increases of mean diffusivity in mild cognitive impairment patients that converted to Alzheimer's disease compared to mild cognitive impairment subjects that remained stable over several years.

    “as well as in MCI patients that converted to AD compared to MCI subjects that remained stable over a period of several years (Douaud et al., 2013, Fellgiebel et al., 2006, Scola et al., 2010, van Uden et al., 2016).”
  • The MCI subjects of the sample were not uniquely amnestic MCI, making the sample more heterogeneous than MCI subgroups in other studies.

    “As a limitation, the MCI subjects of our sample were not uniquely amnestic MCI. Thus, our sample is more heterogeneous than the MCI subgroups in other studies”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fellgiebel, A., Dellani, P. R., Greverus, D., Scheurich, A., Stoeter, P., & Müller, M. J.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Fellgiebel, Andreas
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
146
Issue
3
Pages
283-287
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067279300
Cited by
118
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
amnestic mild cognitive impairment, conversion to dementia, hippocampal volume, diffusion tensor imaging, white matter microstructure, verbal memory, longitudinal follow-up
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review