CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural activation during response inhibition in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Preliminary findings on the effects of medication and symptom severity

Congdon, Eliza, Altshuler, Lori L., Mumford, Jeanette A., Karlsgodt, Katherine H., Sabb, Fred W., Ventura, Joseph, McGough, James J., London, Edythe D., Cannon, Tyrone D., Bilder, Robert M., Poldrack, Russell A.·2014·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
DOI 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.02.002PMC PMC4009011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.02.002

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Aichert, 2012, Associations between trait impulsivity and prepotent response inhibition, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 1016, 10.1080/13803395.2012.706261 · DOI
  2. Aron, 2007, Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI, Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3743, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0519-07.2007 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Aron, 2006, Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus, Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2424, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4682-05.2006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Band, 2003, Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure, Acta Psychologica, 112, 105, 10.1016/S0001-6918(02)00079-3 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brainard, 1997, The psychophysics toolbox, Spatial Vision, 10, 433, 10.1163/156856897X00357 · DOI
  6. Carmona, 2012, Response inhibition and reward anticipation in medication-naive adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a within-subject case-control neuroimaging study, Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2350, 10.1002/hbm.21368 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Chamberlain, 2009, Atomoxetine modulates right inferior frontal activation during inhibitory control: a pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging study, Biological Psychiatry, 65, 550, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.014 · DOI
  8. Congdon, 2010, Engagement of large-scale networks is related to individual differences in inhibitory control, Neuroimage, 53, 653, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.062 · DOI
  9. Congdon, 2012, Measurement and reliability of response inhibition, Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 37, 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00037 · DOI
  10. Costa, 2012, Methylphenidate effects on neural activity during response inhibition in healthy humans, Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1179, 10.1093/cercor/bhs107 · DOI
  11. Cubillo, 2010, Reduced activation and inter-regional functional connectivity of fronto-striatal networks in adults with childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and persisting symptoms during tasks of motor inhibition and cognitive switching, Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44, 629, 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.11.016 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Desikan, 2006, An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest, Neuroimage, 31, 968, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dibbets, 2009, Differences in feedback- and inhibition-related neural activity in adult ADHD, Brain and Cognition, 70, 73, 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.01.001 · DOI
  14. Dillo, 2010, Neuronal correlates of ADHD in adults with evidence for compensation strategies – a functional MRI study with a Go/No-Go paradigm, German Medical Science, 8, Doc09
  15. Ghahremani, 2012, Striatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors mediate response inhibition and related activity in frontostriatal neural circuitry in humans, Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7316, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4284-11.2012 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Goodman, 2009, ADHD in adults: update for clinicians on diagnosis and assessment, Primary Psychiatry, 16, 38
  17. Hart, 2012, Meta-analysis of fMRI studies of timing in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 2248, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Karch, 2010, Neural correlates (ERP/fMRI) of voluntary selection in adult ADHD patients, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 260, 427, 10.1007/s00406-009-0089-y · DOI
  19. Kaufman, 1997, Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 980, 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kooistra, 2010, Preliminary fMRI findings on the effects of event rate in adults with ADHD, Journal of Neural Transmission, 117, 655, 10.1007/s00702-010-0374-y · DOI
  21. Mannuzza, 2003, Persistence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder into adulthood: what have we learned from the prospective follow-up studies?, Journal of Attention Disorders, 7, 93, 10.1177/108705470300700203 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mulligan, 2011, Neural correlates of inhibitory control in adult attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: evidence from the Milwaukee longitudinal sample, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 194, 119, 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2011.02.003 · DOI
  23. Prehn-Kristensen, 2011, Methylphenidate does not improve interference control during a working memory task in young patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Brain Research, 1388, 56, 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.075 · DOI
  24. Rubia, 2011, Methylphenidate normalizes fronto-striatal underactivation during interference inhibition in medication-naive boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 1575, 10.1038/npp.2011.30 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Schachar, 2007, Restraint and cancellation: multiple inhibition deficits in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 229, 10.1007/s10802-006-9075-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Schneider, 2010, Impairment of fronto-striatal and parietal cerebral networks correlates with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) psychopathology in adults – a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 183, 75, 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.04.005 · DOI
  27. Schweren, 2013, MR imaging of the effects of methylphenidate on brain structure and function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, European Neuropsychopharmacology, 23, 1151, 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.10.014 · DOI
  28. Sebastian, 2012, Neural correlates of interference inhibition, action withholding and action cancelation in adult ADHD, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 202, 132, 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.02.010 · DOI
  29. Shafritz, 2004, The effects of methylphenidate on neural systems of attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1990, 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.11.1990 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Shaw, 2009, Psychostimulant treatment and the developing cortex in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 58, 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050781 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Smith, 2004, Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL, Neuroimage, 23, S208, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Swick, 2011, Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks, Neuroimage, 56, 1655, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.070 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Vaidya, 1998, Selective effects of methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a functional magnetic resonance study, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 14494, 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14494 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Van Essen, 2005, A population-average, landmark- and surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex, Neuroimage, 28, 635, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.058 · DOI · Paper page
  35. White, 2014, Decomposing decision components in the Stop-Signal task: a model-based approach to individual differences in inhibitory control, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,, 10.1162/jocn_a_00567 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Congdon, E., Altshuler, L. L., Mumford, J. A., Karlsgodt, K. H., Sabb, F. W., Ventura, J., McGough, J. J., London, E. D., Cannon, T. D., Bilder, R. M., & Poldrack, R. A.
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
222
Issue
1-2
Pages
17-28
ISSN
0925-4927
DOI
10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.02.002
PMC
PMC4009011
Cited by
42
References
14
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review