The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating challenges to Industry 4.0 initiatives for supply chain sustainability in emerging economies
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Data security and liability risks are heightened within a highly interoperable ecosystem where one compromised node could impact many others (Allam and Dhunny 2019;Luthra and Mangla 2018), with the effects of security breaches especially damaging in these complex and interdependent systems involving multiple stakeholders.”
From Artificial intelligence in support of the circular economy: ethical considerations and a path forward (2024) · cites this paper as Luthra and Mangla 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Kaiser, H. F. (1974) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291575 · Cited by 14,898 · cited 1×
“The KMO value obtained (0.758) is significantly more than the recommended minimum value i.e. 0.6 (Kaiser, 1974; Hair et al. 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialMultivariate data analysis : a global perspective
Hair, J. F. (2010) · Cited by 12,258
Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios
Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B. (2016) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.488 · Cited by 2,978 · cited 2×
“The fourth industrial revolution provides tremendous industrialization growth, but may also disturb the sustainability of current industrial systems (Hermann et al., 2016; Liao et al., 2017).”
BackgroundPast, present and future of Industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1308576 · Cited by 2,036 · cited 4×
“[Figure 1 about here] For this work, we performed Systematic Literature Review (SLR) (Biel and Glock, 2016; Papadopoulos et al., 2016; Liao et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialService Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment
Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., & Yang, S. (2014) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.001 · Cited by 1,965
Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
Stock, T. W., & Seliger, G. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129 · Cited by 1,947 · cited 3×
“Smart factories can have a variety of sustainability implications like optimal use of resources, technology etc. (Stock and Seliger, 2016; Quezada et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialIndustry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics
Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002 · Cited by 1,931 · cited 1×
“clear definition for proper understanding and practice in business (Hofmann and Rüsch, 2017).”
BackgroundWollschlaeger, M., Sauter, T., & Jasperneite, J. (2017) · IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mie.2017.2649104 · Cited by 1,726 · cited 1×
“0 Over the past few years, industrial systems are influenced greatly by the introduction of the IoT and Cyber Physical networks concepts (Wollschlaeger et al., 2017).”
BackgroundImplementing Smart Factory of Industrie 4.0: An Outlook
Wang, S., Wan, J., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1155/2016/3159805 · Cited by 1,527 · cited 1×
“and activities to integrate and making manufacturing system more flexible, economical, and environmental friendly (Wang et al., 2016).”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 906
The Current Status and Developing Trends of Industry 4.0: a Review
Lu, Y. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10221-w · Cited by 150
“These innovative displays are not only data, but they also offer effective methods to help teams develop technology and increase their mission success rates (Luthra & Mangla, 2018; Ghobakhloo & Fathi, 2019; Machado et al., 2020).”
A SAP-LAP linkages framework for integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy
Chauhan, C., Sharma, A. K., & Singh, A. (2019) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-10-2018-0310 · Cited by 138
Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., Jha, A., Gastaldi, M., Paul, S. K., & D’Adamo, I. (2021) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-021-00288-4 · Cited by 119
The role of emerging technologies in implementing green practices to achieve sustainable operations
Umar, M., Khan, S. A. R., Zia‐ul‐haq, H. M., Yusliza, M. Y., & Farooq, K. (2021) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-06-2021-0172 · Cited by 116
Taddei, E., Sassanelli, C., Rosa, P., & Terzi, S. (2024) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2024.110049 · Cited by 116
Benotsmane, R., Kovács, G., & Dudás, L. (2019) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci8050143 · Cited by 121
Cyber Security and Privacy Issues in Industrial Internet of Things
Jhanjhi, N. Z., Humayun, M., & Almuayqil, S. N. (2021) · Computer Systems Science and Engineering · doi:10.32604/csse.2021.015206 · Cited by 128
Testing an adoption model for Industry 4.0 and sustainability: A Malaysian scenario
Jayashree, S., Reza, M. N. H., Malarvizhi, C. A., Gunasekaran, A., & Rauf, M. A. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.015 · Cited by 116
A Comprehensive Survey on RF Energy Harvesting: Applications and Performance Determinants
Sherazi, H. H. R., Zorbas, D., & O’Flynn, B. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22082990 · Cited by 114
Chalmeta, R., & Santos-deLeón, N. J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104108 · Cited by 117
“0 and Big Data solutions that support sustainable practices in the supply chain is required [6,15,16].”
BackgroundInfluentialDwivedi, A., Moktadir, M. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Carvalho, D. E. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121335 · Cited by 123
Barriers to sustainable sourcing in the apparel and fashion luxury industry
Bhandari, N., Garza‐Reyes, J. A., Rocha-Lona, L., Kumar, A., V, Naz, F., & Joshi, R. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.007 · Cited by 112
Dacre, N., Yan, J., Frei, R., Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S., & Dong, H. (2024) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2024.2380361 · Cited by 127
“…sustainability and human-centricity, or sustainability and resilience (Bai et al. 2020; Ivanov 2018; Kamble, Gunasekaran, and Gawankar 2018; Kazancoglu et al. 2021; Li, Dai, and Cui 2020; Luthra and Mangla 2018; Mubarik et al. 2021; Ralston and Blackhurst 2020; Scavarda et al. 2019).”
Kumar, A., V, Choudhary, S., Garza‐Reyes, J. A., Kumar, P. V., Khan, S. A. R., & Mishra, N. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.1980905 · Cited by 109
“…CSC. CSFs References Coordination and collaboration among supply chain partners Fischer and Pascucci 2017; De Angelis, Howard, and Miemczyk 2018; Luthra and Mangla 2018; Mangla et al. 2018 Change management Jones, Jimmieson, and Griffiths 2005; Shamim et al. 2017; de Sousa Jabbour, Jabbour,…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBarriers to the adoption of digital technologies in a functional circular economy network
Vimal, K. E. K., Sivakumar, K., Kandasamy, J., Venkat, V., & Mani, R. S. (2023) · Operations Management Research · doi:10.1007/s12063-023-00375-y · Cited by 138
“Considering the supply chain as global, we cannot expect everyone to be equipped with the latest technologies (Luthra and Mangla 2018).”
BackgroundGajdzik, B., Grabowska, S., Saniuk, S., & Wieczorek, T. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13164254 · Cited by 131
Al‐Swidi, A. K., Hair, J. F., & Al‐Hakimi, M. A. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3393 · Cited by 109
Baz, J. E., Tiwari, S., Akenroye, T. O., Cherrafi, A., & Derrouiche, R. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130909 · Cited by 109
A Review of Digital Transformation on Supply Chain Process Management Using Text Mining
Madjid Tavana, D., Shaabani, A., Vanani, I. R., & Gangadhari, R. K. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10050842 · Cited by 106
“BDA enables companies to reduce operating costs, improve SC agility, and increase customer satisfaction as the market changes rapidly, and ultimately make these companies excel [46].”
Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors
Srivastava, D., Kumar, P. V., Ekren, B. Y., Upadhyay, A., Tyagi, M., & Kumari, A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121439 · Cited by 115
“…environment has undergone a significant transformation as the adoption of Industry 4.0 in manufacturing has revolutionised production processes and operations (Luthra and Mangla, 2018; deSousaJabbour et al., 2018) and this has led to an advancement in manufacturing systems (Li, 2018; Sung, 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialKunkel, S., Matthess, M., Xue, B., & Beier, G. (2022) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106274 · Cited by 105
Mastrocinque, E., Ramírez, F. J., Honrubia‐Escribano, A., & Pham, D. T. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121813 · Cited by 108
Prioritization of strategies to overcome the barriers in Industry 4.0: a hybrid MCDM approach
Kumar, V., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2021) · OPSEARCH · doi:10.1007/s12597-020-00505-1 · Cited by 104
Technological competitiveness and emerging technologies in industry 4.0 and industry 5.0.
Álvarez-Aros, É. L., & Bernal-Torres, C. (2021) · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências · doi:10.1590/0001-3765202120191290 · Cited by 89
“…while in the former regularly work on very specific and oriented to technological enablers, in the latter mostly work on the issues in a general way, issues related to mature technologies still developed and challenges are yet addressed on essential technologies as stated by Luthra & Mangla (2018).”
BackgroundCaiado, R. G. G., Scavarda, L. F., Azevedo, B. D., Nascimento, D. L. D. M., & Quelhas, O. L. G. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14020830 · Cited by 108
Piccarozzi, M., Silvestri, C., Aquilani, B., & Silvestri, L. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121511 · Cited by 112
Quality Culture of Manufacturing Enterprises: A Possible Way to Adaptation to Industry 4.0
Ďurana, P., Kráľ, P., Stehel, V., Lăzăroiu, G., & Sroka, W. (2019) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci8040124 · Cited by 103
“Luthra and Mangla (2018) as well as Ohanyan and Androniceanu (2017) comprehensively evaluate the challenges of Industry 4.0 in emerging economies.”
BackgroundInfluentialDixit, A. K., Jakhar, S. K., & Kumar, P. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121328 · Cited by 102
Zhang, A., Venkatesh, V. G., Wang, J. X., Mani, V., Wan, M., & Qu, T. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.1980909 · Cited by 100
“Industry 4.0 allows the systems to integrate a cyber-physical network of machines, sensors and facilities to streamline data management (Luthra and Mangla 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialBehl, A., Singh, R., Pereira, V. E., & Laker, B. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122363 · Cited by 107
Factors affecting Industry 4.0 adoption – A hybrid SEM-ANN approach
Parhi, S., Joshi, K., Wuest, T., & Akarte, M. (2022) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2022.108062 · Cited by 99
Khan, I. S., Ahmad, M. O., & Majava, J. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137006 · Cited by 110
“0 and sustainability are relatively recent emerging but major trends in sustainable production literature (Luthra and Mangla, 2018; Bai et al., 2020; Dubey et al., 2019).”
BackgroundThe impacts of Industry 4.0: a descriptive survey in the Italian manufacturing sector
Zheng, T., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., Perona, M., & Zanardini, M. (2019) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-08-2018-0269 · Cited by 99
Implementing industry 4.0 in the manufacturing sector: Circular economy as a societal solution
Upadhyay, A., Balodi, K. C., Naz, F., Nardo, M. D., & Jraisat, L. (2023) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2023.109072 · Cited by 100
Akbari, M., Kok, S. K., Hopkins, J., Frederico, G. F., Nguyen, H. M., & Alonso, A. D. (2023) · The International Journal of Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijlm-11-2022-0442 · Cited by 109
Supply chain risks in Industry 4.0 environment: review and analysis framework
Pandey, S., Singh, R. K., & Gunasekaran, A. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.2005173 · Cited by 99
Examining the role of procurement 4.0 towards remanufacturing operations and circular economy
Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Gupta, S., & Sivarajah, U. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1817602 · Cited by 94
“0 business process management decisions (Luthra and Mangla 2018).”
Roberts, H., Zhang, J., Bariach, B., Cowls, J., Gilburt, B., Juneja, P., Tsamados, A., Ziosi, M., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2024) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01596-8 · Cited by 123
“…liability risks are heightened within a highly interoperable ecosystem where one compromised node could impact many others (Allam and Dhunny 2019; Luthra and Mangla 2018), with the effects of security breaches especially damaging in these complex and interdependent systems involving multiple…”
Flexibility in the Brazilian Industry 4.0: Challenges and Opportunities
Contador, J. C., Sátyro, W. C., Contador, J. L., & Spínola, M. D. M. (2020) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-020-00240-y · Cited by 94
Oliva, F. L., Teberga, P. M. F., Testi, L. I. O., Kotabe, M. “., Giudice, M. D., Kelle, P., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121346 · Cited by 117
Wang, N., Ren, S., Liu, Y., Yang, M., Wang, J., & Huisingh, D. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123365 · Cited by 99
Developing human resource for the digitization of logistics operations: readiness index framework
Gupta, A., Singh, R. K., & Gupta, S. (2021) · International Journal of Manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0175 · Cited by 106
Redesigning traditional linear supply chains into circular supply chains–A study into its challenges
Roy, T., Garza‐Reyes, J. A., Kumar, P. V., Kumar, A., V, & Agrawal, R. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.004 · Cited by 93
Significant Applications of Big Data in Industry 4.0
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2021) · Journal of Industrial Integration and Management · doi:10.1142/s2424862221500135 · Cited by 98
Narula, S., Puppala, H., Kumar, A., V, Frederico, G. F., Dwivedy, M., Prakash, S., & Talwar, V. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127141 · Cited by 92
Key Enablers of Industry 4.0 Development at Firm Level: Findings From an Emerging Economy
Adebanjo, D., Laosirihongthong, T., Samaranayake, P., & Teh, P. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.3046764 · Cited by 91
“In a study of the Indian manufacturing sector, Luthra and Mangla [51] posited that Industry 4.0 is in its nascent stage and iden-tified four dimensions of key challenges to Industry 4.0 for a sustainable supply chain.”
BackgroundInfluentialStawiarska, E. M., Szwajca, D., Matusek, M., & Wolniak, R. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13094867 · Cited by 97
“• Developing and applying risk management models based on existing standards (ISO 9001, ISO 140001, ISO 45001, ISO 27001), or perhaps create entirely new ones growing out of the risk-based thinking (RBT) stream [104]; • Creating framework requirements for required skills, new ways of organizing work, interactions, and…”
BackgroundDeveloping human capital 4.0 in emerging economies: an industry 4.0 perspective
Singh, R., Agrawal, S., & Modgil, S. (2021) · International journal of manpower · doi:10.1108/ijm-03-2021-0159 · Cited by 76
Sustainable Supply Chain Management in a Circular Economy: A Bibliometric Review
Theeraworawit, M., Suriyankietkaew, S., & Hallinger, P. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14159304 · Cited by 90
Industry 5.0 and Triple Bottom Line Approach in Supply Chain Management: The State-of-the-Art
Varriale, V., Cammarano, A., Michelino, F., & Caputo, M. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15075712 · Cited by 90
“Recently, Industry 4.0 and sustainability issues have been associated, helping SCM scholars and practitioners to develop a more sustainable the-orisation and approach to operations management [8].”
BackgroundInfluentialSupply Chain 4.0: the impact of supply chain digitalization and integration on firm performance
Liu, K. P., & Chiu, W. (2021) · Asian Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s13520-021-00137-8 · Cited by 100
“During the revolution, most of the organizations seems to struggle in transforming the vision-ary ideas to a missionary level of developing the ethics and sustainability in supply chain (Erol et al., 2016; Luthra & Mangla, 2018).”
BackgroundRaut, R. D., Gotmare, A., Narkhede, B. E., Govindarajan, U. H., & Bokade, S. U. (2020) · IEEE Engineering Management Review · doi:10.1109/emr.2020.2987884 · Cited by 94
“The third industrial revolution occurred recently in the 1970s and introduced flexible automation in manufacturing using computers and robots [Luthra and Mangla, 2018].”
BackgroundGadekar, R., Sarkar, B., & Gadekar, A. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.010 · Cited by 91
Amin, A., Bhuiyan, M. R. I., Hossain, R., Molla, C., Poli, T. A., & Milon, M. N. U. (2024) · Business Strategy & Development · doi:10.1002/bsd2.363 · Cited by 86
Nyagadza, B., Pashapa, R., Chare, A., Mazuruse, G., & Hove, P. K. (2022) · Cogent Economics & Finance · doi:10.1080/23322039.2021.2014654 · Cited by 85
Addas, A., Khan, M. N., & Naseer, F. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307608 · Cited by 85
Tortorella, G. L., Rossini, M., Costa, F., Staudacher, A. P., & Sawhney, R. S. (2019) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2019.1696184 · Cited by 87
“Such research need has also been observed by Strange and Zucchella (2017), Luthra and Mangla (2018) and Dalenogare et al. (2018).”
BackgroundDigital supply chain research trends: a systematic review and a maturity model for adoption
Weerabahu, S. K., Samaranayake, P., Nakandala, D., & Hurriyet, H. (2022) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-12-2021-0782 · Cited by 95
Industry 4.0: critical investigations and synthesis of key findings
Elnadi, M., & Abdallah, Y. O. (2023) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00314-4 · Cited by 96
“The implementation of Industry 4.0 needs rapid and reliable internet connectivity and access (Kamble et al. 2018b; Luthra and Mangla 2018; Moktadir et al. 2018; Oesterreich and Teuteberg 2016).”
InfluentialPersis, J., Venkatesh, V. G., Sreedharan, V. R., Shi, Y., & Sankaranarayanan, B. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126871 · Cited by 83
Mishra, R., Singh, R. K., & Rana, N. P. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3619 · Cited by 83
Tsolakis, N., Harrington, T. S., & Srai, J. S. (2021) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2021.1980907 · Cited by 82
“Hence, the current literature is inadequate in informing relevant business strategies and in fostering the deployment of smart manufacturing networks that might be more environmentally friendly, flexible and economical (Luthra and Mangla 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialYüksel, H. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101364 · Cited by 81
Martín-Gómez, A. M., Aguayo-González, F., & Luque, A. (2018) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.035 · Cited by 83
Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., & Yadav, G. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.011 · Cited by 80
Self-citationIntegrating Industry 4.0 and circular economy: a review
Sahu, A., Agrawal, S., & Kumar, G. (2021) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-11-2020-0465 · Cited by 90
Reis, J. S. D. M., Espuny, M., Nunhes, T. V., Sampaio, N. A. D. S., Isaksson, R., de Campos, F. C., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13095232 · Cited by 84
“(2018) [37]; Luthra and Mangla (2018) [65]; Müller et al.”
BackgroundNeto, G. C. D. O., Silva, A. D. C., & Filho, M. G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-022-04234-4 · Cited by 78
“…ne n et a l. (2 01 8) x X environmental, and/or social gain through the adoption of I4 0.0 T. Figure 3 shows that the number of publications increased since 2011, when the concept of Industry 4.0 first appeared, during the Hannover Messe fair, based in Hanover, in Germany (Luthra and Mangla 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialSamanta, M., Virmani, N., Singh, R. K., Haque, S. N., & Jamshed, M. (2023) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-07-2022-0215 · Cited by 77
Gupta, A., & Singh, R. K. (2021) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1985095 · Cited by 90
“Luthra and Mangla (2018) have evaluated challenges for implementing I4.”
BackgroundSaha, P., Talapatra, S., Belal, H. M., & Jackson, V. (2022) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-022-00316-x · Cited by 80
“The reason for this involves an organization’s need to attain and sustain global competitiveness and sustainability, as such, cleaner technology must be used in several ways (Braccini & Margherita, 2019; Luthra & Mangla, 2018).”
Patidar, A., Sharma, M., Agrawal, R., & Sangwan, K. S. (2022) · Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-03-2022-0091 · Cited by 76
Dhayal, K. S., Giri, A. K., Kumar, A., V, Samadhiya, A., Agrawal, S., & Agrawal, R. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-29539-w · Cited by 76
“…communities and their participation in enhancing the GF solution (Basl 2017; Chauhan et al. 2021; Li 2018; Longo et al. 2020; Luthra et al. 2020; Luthra & Mangla 2018; Mukherjee et al. 2023; Özdemir & Hekim 2018; Raj et al. 2020; Tamvada et al. 2022; X. Xu et al. 2021) To ensure that this…”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence (AI) and Its Applications in Indian Manufacturing: A Review
Rizvi, A. P. A. R., Haleem, A., Bahl, S., & Javaid, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-4795-3_76 · Cited by 74
Factors Influencing the Implementation of Industry 4.0 for Sustainability in Manufacturing
Kumar, V., Vrat, P., & Shankar, R. (2022) · Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management · doi:10.1007/s40171-022-00312-1 · Cited by 82
“According to Luthra and Mangla (2018), these technological advancements would have a negative impact on employees’ health and safety.”
InfluentialSharma, M., Raut, R. D., Sehrawat, R., & Ishizaka, A. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118501 · Cited by 80
Digitalization of the supply chain: transformation factors
Aamer, A. M., Sahara, C. R., & Al‐Awlaqi, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-01-2021-0001 · Cited by 72
A comprehensive review on the impact of Industry 4.0 on the development of a sustainable environment
Shabur, M. A. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00290-7 · Cited by 72
“In order to address the pressing issue of the impending climate disaster and work towards a more sustainable future, it is imperative that immediate action is taken and individual responsibility is assumed [26, 27].”
Nimawat, D., & Gidwani, B. D. (2021) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-08-2020-0429 · Cited by 72
Erboz, G., Hüseyinoğlu, I. Ö. Y., & Szegedi, Z. (2021) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-09-2020-0485 · Cited by 75
Awareness and readiness of Industry 4.0: The case of Turkish manufacturing industry
Sari, T., Güleş, H. K., & Yiğitol, B. (2020) · Advances in Production Engineering & Management · doi:10.14743/apem2020.1.349 · Cited by 70
“0 is its potential to contribute to the sustainability of future supply chains with optimum use of resources [5].”
BackgroundDasaklis, T. K., Casino, F., & Patsakis, C. (2020) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa50023.2020.9284394 · Cited by 70
“0 initiatives can significantly influence business systems via transforming how the products are designed, produced, delivered, and discarded [14] or for improving environmental performance that can open up new market segments to companies until previously unexplored [15].”
Industry 4.0 impacts on responsible environmental and societal management in the family business
Kazançoğlu, Y., Sezer, M. D., Özkan-Özen, Y. D., Mangla, S. K., & Kumar, A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121108 · Cited by 70
Self-citationPourmehdi, M., Paydar, M. M., Ghadimi, P., & Azadnia, A. H. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107808 · Cited by 69
Quality 4.0 transition framework for Tanzanian manufacturing industries
Maganga, D. P., & Taifa, I. W. R. (2022) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-01-2022-0036 · Cited by 69
The role of big data for Supply Chain 4.0 in manufacturing organisations of developing countries
Narwane, V. S., Raut, R. D., Yadav, V. S., Cheikhrouhou, N., Narkhede, B. E., & Priyadarshinee, P. (2021) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-11-2020-0463 · Cited by 68
“Moktadir et al. (2019) and Luthra and Mangla (2018) identified challenges in the emerging and developing economies showing that all types of economies are considering the adoption of Supply Chain 4.0.”
InfluentialA holistic model for Global Industry 4.0 readiness assessment
Tripathi, S., & Gupta, M. (2021) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-07-2020-0354 · Cited by 68
Industry 4.0 tools in lean production: A systematic literature review
Gallo, T., Cagnetti, C., Silvestri, C., & Ruggieri, A. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.255 · Cited by 67
The Degree of Contribution of Digital Transformation Technology on Company Sustainability Areas
Costa, I., Riccotta, R., Montini, P., Stefani, E., de Goes, R., Gaspar, M. A., Martins, F. S., Fernandes, A. A., Machado, C., Loçano, R., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14010462 · Cited by 67
“(f) 3D Printer (Additive Manufacturing): three-dimensional printing; changes the value proposition in business in manufacturing companies [60].”
BackgroundKaruppiah, K., Sankaranarayanan, B., D’Adamo, I., & Ali, S. M. (2022) · Journal of Asia Business Studies · doi:10.1108/jabs-05-2021-0202 · Cited by 71
Alkan, N., & Kahraman, C. (2022) · Informatica · doi:10.15388/22-infor493 · Cited by 70
Competitiveness of Food Industry in the Era of Digital Transformation towards Agriculture 4.0
Baierle, I. C., da Silva, F. T., Corrêa, R. G. D. F., Schaefer, J. L., da Costa, M. B., Benitez, G. B., & Nara, E. O. B. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811779 · Cited by 79
Industry 5.0: analyzing the challenges in implementation using grey influence analysis
Rajesh, R. (2023) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-03-2023-0121 · Cited by 75
Paving the way for the circular economy and more sustainable supply chains
de Oliveira, M. C. C., Machado, M. C., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S. (2019) · Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal · doi:10.1108/meq-01-2019-0005 · Cited by 71
Potential of additive manufacturing for upstream automotive supply chains
Muhammad, M. S., Kerbache, L., & Elomri, A. (2022) · Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal · doi:10.1080/16258312.2021.1973872 · Cited by 65
Evaluating challenges to implementing eco-innovation for freight logistics sustainability in Nigeria
Orji, I. J., Kusi‐Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., & Okwu, M. O. (2019) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.001 · Cited by 65
The fourth industrial revolution of supply chains: A tertiary study
Barata, J. (2021) · Journal of engineering and technology management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101624 · Cited by 58
“For example, the lack of infrastructure and standards or poor data quality, particularly in the emerging economies (Luthra and Mangla, 2018).”
InfluentialSingh, M., Goyat, R., & Panwar, R. (2023) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-07-2022-0231 · Cited by 72
i-Pulse: A NLP based novel approach for employee engagement in logistics organization
Garg, R., Kiwelekar, A. W., Netak, L. D., & Ghodake, A. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management Data Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100011 · Cited by 64
Risks to Big Data Analytics and Blockchain Technology Adoption in Supply Chains
Narwane, V. S., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Dora, M. K., & Narkhede, B. E. (2021) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04396-3 · Cited by 66
“Compared with fuzzy theory, grey theory (i) does not require a healthy membership function, (ii) can process a small sample, and (iii) can handle inadequate information (Luthra et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Luthra, Sunil
- Venue
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 117
- Pages
- 168-179
- ISSN
- 0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
- 0957-5820
- OpenAlex
- W2801978012
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 146 · 2023: 135 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 63.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Process Safety and Environmental Protection (publishedVersion)
- PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- Industry 4.0, supply chain sustainability, emerging markets, Indian manufacturing, organizational challenges, technical challenges, strategic challenges, legal and ethical issues, process safety, environmental protection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
