Cited by 79Stress Responses and CortisolTreatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DEX/CRH test for major depression: A potentially useful diagnostic test

Mokhtari, Mohammadreza, Arfken, Cynthia, Boutros, Nash·2013·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone (DEX/CRH) test has been proposed as a potential diagnostic test for major depressive disorder (MDD). A previously proposed four-step approach assesses the stage of development for a biological finding into a clinically useful diagnostic test. Using this approach, we evaluated the progress of the DEX/CRH test using meta-analysis as a part of step 1. A literature review identified 15 studies of the DEX/CRH test in patients with MDD and healthy controls. Meta-analysis estimated the effect size, heterogeneity, and confidence intervals using random effects models. Studies consistent with any step of the four-step approach were identified, and their characteristics were presented. Eleven studies reported significantly higher cortisol levels with the DEX/CRH test in patients with MDD, compared with the healthy controls (step 1). Eight eligible studies were included in meta-analysis, and had an effect size of 1.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.97). Most studies were step-1 studies (comparison of patients and healthy controls), and no step-4 studies (multicenter trials) were found. This review emphasizes that despite appearing as a promising test, the DEX/CRH has not been adequately studied for the required stages of development into a clinically useful laboratory test. Particularly, additional step-3 and step-4 studies are necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.09.032

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a meta-analysis of 15 studies examining the dexamethasone/CRH test as a potential biomarker for MDD, patients had greater cortisol levels following the test compared to controls.

    “In a metaanalysis of 15 studies examing the role of the dexamethasone /CRH test as potential biomarker for MDD, patients had greater cortisol levels following the test compared to controls (171).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mokhtari, M., Arfken, C., & Boutros, N.
Affiliations
  • Hartford Hospital (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Mokhtari, Mohammadreza
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
208
Issue
2
Pages
131-139
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121028619
Cited by
79
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, diagnostic test development, cortisol, dexamethasone, corticotropin-releasing factor, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
MeSH terms
Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Dexamethasone, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Pituitary-Adrenal Function Tests, Predictive Value of Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review