Cited by 236Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Public perceptions of stigma towards people with schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety

Wood, Lisa, Birtel, Michele, Alsawy, Sarah, Pyle, Melissa, Morrison, Anthony·2014·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Stigma is one of the greatest challenges facing people with a psychiatric diagnosis. They are widely stigmatised by the general public in the western world. The aim of this study was to examine public stigma attitudes towards schizophrenia, depression and anxiety. The Office of National Statistics (ONS) 2008 opinions survey (n=1070) was utilised. Percentage of endorsements for stigma items were initially compared to the previous 1998 and 2003 databases. Overall stigma attitudes had decreased (from 1998 to 2008) but increased since 2003. A principal components factor analysis identified that stigma attitudes have the same three factors structure across all diagnoses; negative stereotypes, patient blame and inability to recover. Schizophrenia was significantly associated with the most negative stereotypes, least blamed and viewed as least likely to recover compared to anxiety and depression. Public and individualised interventions that target diagnostic variability in stigma attitudes need to be developed and examined in future research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.07.012

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Silton, 2011, Stigma in America: Has Anything Changed?: Impact of Perceptions of Mental Illness and Dangerousness on the Desire for Social Distance: 1996 and 2006, Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 119, 361, 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31821cd112 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 236

Metadata

Authors
Wood, L., Birtel, M., Alsawy, S., Pyle, M., & Morrison, A.
Affiliations
  • North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
Corresponding author
Wood, Lisa
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
220
Issue
1-2
Pages
604-608
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164193049
Cited by
236
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
public stigma, schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, stigma attitudes, negative stereotypes, recovery expectations, mental health stigma
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Public Opinion, Research, Schizophrenia, Stereotyping, Population Groups, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review