Cited by 154Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Education and ValidationHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Expanding a Measure of Mental Health Literacy: Development and Validation of a Multicomponent Mental Health Literacy Measure

Jung, Hyejin, von Sternberg, Kirk, Davis, King·2016·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Mental health literacy (MHL) is an important factor in mental health care. However, few measures are available that assess multiple components of MHL and that are applicable to lay community people. A valid, comprehensive measure is needed to adequately identify the level of MHL and need for mental health education. This study presents the development of a multicomponent MHL measure and its psychometric properties. Participants (n=211) were recruited from a local public housing authority in Texas. A series of an exploratory factor analysis, a confirmatory factor analysis, an independent sample t-test, and a correlation analysis were used to assess construct, known-groups, and concurrent validity. Internal consistency reliability was examined by Kuder-Richardson Formula 20. The result suggested a second-order factor model by three first-order factors: knowledge-oriented MHL; beliefs-oriented MHL; resource-oriented MHL. This measure was a valid tool to assess MHL among public housing staff. This measure can be useful in examining lay community members' levels of MHL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.06.034

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Questionnaires were developed to evaluate MHL for the target population, notably the Mental Health Literacy Scale, the Multicomponent Mental Health Literacy Scale, and the Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire.

    “To evaluate MHL, questionnaires were developed for the target population presented above, notably the Mental Health Literacy Scale [53], the Multicomponent Mental Health Literacy Scale [54], and the Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire [55].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jung, H., von Sternberg, K., & Davis, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Jung, Hyejin
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
243
Pages
278-286
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2474633002
Cited by
154
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hogg Foundation for Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
mental health literacy, scale development, psychometric validation, mental health education
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Public Housing, Surveys and Questionnaires, Texas, Reproducibility of Results, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review