Cited by 37Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Management and EducationSchizophrenia research and treatment

Are people with schizophrenia adherent to diabetes medication? A comparative meta-analysis

Open access
Gorczynski, Paul, Firth, Joseph, Stubbs, Brendon, Rosenbaum, Simon, Vancampfort, Davy·2017·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Individuals living with schizophrenia are 2-3 times more likely to experience type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes medication adherence is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population. We conducted a meta-analysis of diabetes medication adherence among people with schizophrenia, and compared this to those without schizophrenia. A systematic search strategy was used to identify all articles reporting adherence to diabetes medications among patients with schizophrenia. In total, 10 unique studies reporting data from 33,910 people with schizophrenia were included. Random effects meta-analysis showed people with schizophrenia adhered to medication on 77.3% of days prescribed (n=32080, 95%CI=73.6-81%, I 2=99.2%,), and adhered on 4.6% more days per year than those without schizophrenia (p<0.01, 95%CI=2.4-6.7%, I 2=92.5%, schizophrenia n=19367, controls=170,853). Furthermore, 56% of individuals with schizophrenia (n=33680) were considered "adherent" (i.e. >80% adherence over 12-24 month) to diabetes medication, which was significantly more than those without schizophrenia (OR=1.34, 95%CI: 1.18-1.52, p<0.01). Factors which were positively associated with diabetes medication adherence were age, number of outpatient visits, along with multiple medication administration variables. Future prospective research should examine diabetes monitoring, medication prescription, and subsequent adherence in fully representative samples. Novel interventions for maximizing compliance to diabetes medication in this vulnerable population should also be explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.049

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gorczynski, P., Firth, J., Stubbs, B., Rosenbaum, S., & Vancampfort, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Gorczynski, Paul
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
250
Pages
17-24
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2579309537
Cited by
37
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
schizophrenia, diabetes medication adherence, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, psychiatric comorbidity, outpatient visits, age
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Prospective Studies, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review