Cited by 34Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Decreased regional homogeneity and increased functional connectivity of default network correlated with neurocognitive deficits in subjects with genetic high-risk for schizophrenia: A resting-state fMRI study

Ma, Xiaoqian, Zheng, Wenxiao, Li, Chunwang, Li, Zongchang, Tang, Jinsong, Yuan, Liu, Ouyang, Lijun, Jin, Ke +2 more·2019·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The complex symptoms of schizophrenia (SCZ) have been associated with dysfunction of the default mode network (DMN). Subjects at genetic high risk (GHR) for SCZ exhibit similar but milder brain abnormalities. This study aimed to investigate functional alterations of DMN from the local to the whole and their relationships with cognitive deficits in GHR subjects. 42 GHR subjects and 38 matched healthy controls (HC) were studied by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Regional homogeneity (ReHo) analysis was performed to measure the local brain function of the DMN, derived by the group independent component analysis, and areas with aberrant ReHo were used as seeds in functional connectivity (FC). Compared with the HC group, the GHR group exhibited significantly decreased ReHo and increased FC in the fronto-limbic-striatal system within the DMN. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was found between decreased ReHo in the right superior frontal gyrus and the delayed recall in GHR subjects. Our findings revealed decreased local function and hyper-connectivity in the fronto-limbic-striatal system of the DMN in GHR subjects, which is associated with cognitive deficits. This may improve our understanding of the neurophysiological endophenotypes of SCZ and the neural substrate underlying the cognitive deficits of the disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112603

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, X., Zheng, W., Li, C., Li, Z., Tang, J., Yuan, L., Ouyang, L., Jin, K., He, Y., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Hunan Children's Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Xiaogang
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
281
Pages
112603
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2979531381
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
schizophrenia, default mode network, regional homogeneity, functional connectivity, neurocognitive impairment, superior frontal gyrus, delayed recall, endophenotypes, hyperconnectivity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Rest, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Young Adult, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review