The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A self-determination process model of physical activity adoption in the context of a randomized controlled trial
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Improved self-control and motivation are key drivers in meeting T2D-relevant health behavior goals [39, 63].”
From Positive Psychological Interventions for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Rationale, Theoretical Model, and Intervention Development (2015) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Grundy, S. M., Bilheimer, D. W., Chait, A., Clark, L. T., Denke, M. A., Havel, R. J., Hazzard, W. R., Hulley, S. B., Hunninghake, D. B., Kreisberg, R. A., et al. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.269.23.3015 · Cited by 27,944
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Expert Panel on Detection, E. (2001) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.285.19.2486 · Cited by 26,011
Chobanian, A. V. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.19.2560 · Cited by 25,386
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,870
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fortier, M., & Kowal, J. (in press). The flow state and PA behavior change as motivational outcomes: A self-determination theory perspective. In M. Hagger & N. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Self-determination theory in exercise and sport.
- Fortier, 2006, Integrating PA counselors in family practice, Canadian Family Physician, 52, 947
- Tulloch, H., Fortier, M., & Hogg, W. (in press). PA counseling in primary care: Who has and who should be counseling? Patient Education and Counseling.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review
Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 · Cited by 2,963
“[17] tested an autonomy-promoting counseling protocol for promoting physical activity in sedentary primary care patients in a 13-week RCT.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFacilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life's domains.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008) · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 · Cited by 2,900
Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis
Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612447309 · Cited by 1,959
“However, it is important to note that we also included several randomized clinical trials (e.g., Fortier et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2006; Williams, McGregor, Zeldman, Freedman, & Deci, 2004) whose findings do imply causality.”
BackgroundSelf-citation(2008) · Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) · Cited by 632
Self-citationTheories of physical activity behaviour change: A history and synthesis of approaches
Rhodes, R. E., McEwan, D., & Rebar, A. L. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.010 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Fortier, M. S., Sweet, S. N., O’Sullivan, T. L., & Williams, G. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fortier, Michelle S.
- Venue
- Psychology of Sport and Exercise
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 741-757
- ISSN
- 1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078710886
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- self-determination theory, physical activity adoption, autonomy support, autonomous motivation, perceived competence, physical activity counseling, primary care intervention, health behavior change, process model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review