Cited by 204Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Oxytocin buffers cortisol responses to stress in individuals with impaired emotion regulation abilities

Quirin, Markus, Kuhl, Julius, Düsing, Rainer·2011·Psychoneuroendocrinology

Abstract

Oxytocin facilitates stress regulation but little is known about individual differences in this effect. The present study investigates whether the effect of intranasal oxytocin on stress-contingent cortisol release differs between individuals with high vs. low emotional regulation abilities (ERA). In a double-blind study thirty-six healthy male students with either high or low ERA were randomly assigned to receive intranasally 24 IU oxytocin or placebo. Cortisol was measured at several times before and after a social stressor (public speaking). Individuals with impaired ERA showed a reduced cortisol response to stress after oxytocin but an increased cortisol response after placebo application. The results suggest that healthy individuals with low ERA benefit from intranasal oxytocin application. Neurobiological mechanisms potentially underlying the link between oxytocin, cortsiol and ERA are discussed against the background of a neuroendocrinological perspective on personality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.12.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxytocin effects can vary as a function of emotion regulation skills.

    “previous research has shown that oxytocin effects can vary as a function of emotion regulation skills (Quirin et al., 2011), social context history of childhood maltreatment (Ebert et al., 2013; Flanagan et al., 2015), and sex (Ditzen et al., 2012; Rilling et al., 2014).”
  • The inhibition of palatable snack intake by oxytocin involves a stress axis-related component.

    “The conclusion that the inhibition of palatable snack intake by oxytocin involves a stress axis-related component (43) is supported by the positive association between the attenuating effects of oxytocin on cortisol concentrations and chocolate cookie intake.”

    From Oxytocin Reduces Reward-Driven Food Intake in Humans (2013) · cites this paper as [43]

  • One new hypothesis regarding intranasal oxytocin's effects on human behavior suggests that intranasal oxytocin attenuates stress responses more effectively for those with vulnerabilities such as poor coping and emotion regulation skills compared to those equipped with more adaptive stress responses.

    “As a result, one new hypothesis regarding intranasal oxytocin’s effects on human behavior suggests that intranasal oxytocin attenuates stress responses more effectively for those with vulnerabilities such as poor coping and emotion regulation skills compared to those equipped with more adaptive stress responses (Bartz et al., 2010; Cardoso et al., 2012; Quirin et al., 2011).”
  • Accumulating evidence has shown stronger effects of OT in individuals with high trait anxiety, high autistic traits, impaired emotion regulation, low emotional sensitivity, or high attachment avoidance.

    “Accumulating evidence has shown stronger effects of OT in individuals with high trait anxiety (34), high autistic traits (9), impaired emotion regulation (35), low emotional sensitivity (36), or high attachment avoidance (50).”
  • The studies showing stronger OT effects in less socially adapted individuals mainly used self-centered measures, such as anxiety traits measured by STAI-T, sociocognitive skills, or emotional sensitivity/regulation.

    “However, the studies showing stronger OT effects in less socially adapted individuals mainly used self-centered measures, such as anxiety traits measured by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) (34), sociocognitive skills (9), or emotional sensitivity/regulation (35, 36).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 204

Authors
Quirin, M., Kuhl, J., & Düsing, R.
Affiliations
Osnabrück University (DE)
Corresponding author
Quirin, Markus
Venue
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
898-904
ISSN
0306-4530 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142877367
Cited by
204
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 7
FWCI
26.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychoneuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universität Trier
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, cortisol, emotion regulation ability, stress response, social stress, public speaking, individual differences, intranasal administration
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Fear, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Individuality, Male, Oxytocin, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Speech, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review