CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of factors from different time points on psychological readiness following ACL reconstruction

Hopper, Haleigh M., Bruce Leicht, Amelia S., Thompson, Xavier D., Gwathmey, F. Winston, Miller, Mark D., Werner, Brian C., Brockmeier, Stephen F., Diduch, David R., Hart, Joseph M.·2024·Physical Therapy in Sport
DOI 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.05.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine factors correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR. Design cross sectional study. Setting controlled laboratory. Participants 164 patients (82 M/82 F, 22.5 ± 8.9yr, 171.6 ± 11.0 cm, 77.4 ± 18.6 kg, 8.6 ± 3.4 months post-ACLR) participated in this study after a primary, isolated, and uncomplicated ACLR. Main outcome measures ACL Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI). Results ACL-RSI scores demonstrated a weak positive correlation with activity level at the time of injury and a fair positive correlation with activity level at the time of post-operative testing (p-values: 0.004, Conclusions Outcomes from testing during postoperative rehabilitation were most correlated with psychological readiness to return to activity after ACLR. Increased pain and kinesiophobia were associated with a decreased psychological readiness. Increased activity level prior to injury and activity level at the time of testing during rehabilitation were both correlated with increased psychological readiness. Psychological readiness to return to activity may need to be customized based on potentially modifiable patient-specific factors during the post-operative rehabilitation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.05.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Ardern, 2014, Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48, 1543, 10.1136/bjsports-2013-093398 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ardern, 2011, Return to the preinjury level of competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: Two-thirds of patients have not returned by 12 Months after surgery, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 39, 538, 10.1177/0363546510384798 · DOI
  3. Briggs, 2009, The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 37, 890, 10.1177/0363546508330143 · DOI
  4. Brinkman, 2019, Use of goal setting to enhance self-efficacy after sports-related injury: A critically appraised topic, Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 29, 498, 10.1123/jsr.2019-0032 · DOI
  5. Burland, 2020, What are our patients really telling us? Psychological constructs associated with patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Journal of Athletic Training, 55, 707, 10.4085/1062-6050-120-19 · DOI
  6. Burland, 2018, Clinical outcome measures and return-to-sport timing in adolescent athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Journal of Athletic Training, 53, 442, 10.4085/1062-6050-302-16 · DOI
  7. Burland, 2018, Decision to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Part I: A qualitative investigation of psychosocial factors, Journal of Athletic Training, 53, 452, 10.4085/1062-6050-313-16 · DOI
  8. Czuppon, 2014, Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48, 356, 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091786 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Daley, 2021, The mental side of the injured athlete, JAAOS - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 29, 499
  10. Edwards, 2018, Patient characteristics and predictors of return to sport at 12 Months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: The importance of patient age and postoperative rehabilitation, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 6, 10.1177/2325967118797575 · DOI
  11. Filbay, 2017, Return to sport matters—longer-term quality of life after ACL reconstruction in people with knee difficulties, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27, 514, 10.1111/sms.12698 · DOI
  12. Gennarelli, 2020, Psychosocial interventions help facilitate recovery following musculoskeletal sports injuries: A systematic review, The Physician and Sportsmedicine, 48, 370, 10.1080/00913847.2020.1744486 · DOI
  13. Harris, 2014, Return to sport after ACL reconstruction, Orthopedics, 37, e103, 10.3928/01477447-20140124-10 · DOI
  14. Kostyun, 2021, Male and female adolescent athletes' readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 31, 383, 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000751 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lentz, 2012, Return to preinjury sports participation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Contributions of demographic, knee impairment, and self-report measures, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 42, 893, 10.2519/jospt.2012.4077 · DOI
  16. Losciale, 2020, Hop testing lacks strong association with key outcome variables after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 48, 511, 10.1177/0363546519838794 · DOI
  17. Mather, 2013, Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume, 95, 1751
  18. Myles, 2017, Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: The minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 118, 424, 10.1093/bja/aew466 · DOI
  19. Paterno, 2018, Self-reported fear predicts functional performance and second ACL injury after ACL reconstruction and return to sport: A pilot study, Sport Health, 10, 228, 10.1177/1941738117745806 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Schilaty, 2016, Use of objective neurocognitive measures to assess the psychological States that influence return to sport following injury, Sports Medicine, 46, 299, 10.1007/s40279-015-0435-3 · DOI
  21. Sepúlveda, 2017, Anterior cruciate ligament injury: Return to play, function and long-term considerations, Current Sports Medicine Reports, 16, 172, 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000356 · DOI
  22. Siegel, 2012, Anterior cruciate ligament injuries: Anatomy, physiology, biomechanics, and management, Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 22, 349, 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3182580cd0 · DOI
  23. Tegner, 1985, Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 198, 43, 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Webster, 2008, Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, Physical Therapy in Sport, 9, 9, 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Webster, 2018, Factors associated with psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 46, 1545, 10.1177/0363546518773757 · DOI
  26. Werner, 2018, Decision to return to sport participation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Part II: Self-reported and functional performance outcomes, Journal of Athletic Training, 53, 464, 10.4085/1062-6050-328-16 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Hopper, H. M., Bruce Leicht, A. S., Thompson, X. D., Gwathmey, F. W., Miller, M. D., Werner, B. C., Brockmeier, S. F., Diduch, D. R., & Hart, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Hopper, Haleigh M.
ORCID
Venue
Physical Therapy in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
67
Pages
161-166
ISSN
1466-853X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.05.002
OpenAlex
W4398242580
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Physical Therapy in Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, psychological readiness, return to sport, ACL-RSI, kinesiophobia, postoperative pain, postoperative rehabilitation, patient factors
MeSH terms
Return to Sport, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Time Factors, Recovery of Function, Young Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review