Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chronology and new research on the Schaefer mammoth (?Mammuthus primigenius) site, Kenosha County, Wisconsin, USA

Joyce, Daniel J.·2006·Quaternary International

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2005.03.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans were present in North America during the period ~14 to ~15 ka ago, as documented by archaeological evidence radiocarbon dated to ~14.6 ka at Page-Ladson, Florida; ~14.2 ka at Paisley Caves, Oregon; ~14.2 and ~14.8 ka at Schaefer and Hebior, Wisconsin; and ~13.8 ka at Manis, Washington.

    “In North America, humans were present during the period ~14 to ~15 ka ago, as documented by archaeological evidence radiocarbon dated to ~14.6 ka ago at Page-Ladson, Florida (4); ~14.2 ka ago at Paisley Caves, Oregon (5); ~14.2 and ~14.8 ka ago at Schaefer and Hebior, Wisconsin (6, 7); and ~13.8 ka ago at Manis, Washington (8).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Averianov, A., 1996. Sexual dimorphism in the mammoth skull, teeth, and long bones. In: The Proboscidea, Evolution and Paleoecology of Elephants and Their Relatives, pp. 260–267. · DOI
  2. Birks, 1976, Late-Wisconsinan vegetational history at Wolf Creek, central Minnesota, Ecological Monographs, 46, 395, 10.2307/1942564 · DOI
  3. Dallman, 1997, A revised chronology for cultural and non-cultural mammoths and mastodon fossils in the Southwestern Lake Michigan Basin, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 13, 10
  4. Fredlund, 1996, Late Pleistocene vegetation of Hebior mammoth site, Southeastern Wisconsin, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 13, 87
  5. Grüger, 1973, Studies on the Late Quaternary vegetation history of northeastern Kansas, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 84, 239, 10.1130/0016-7606(1973)84<239:SOTLQV>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hansel, A.K., Mickelson, D.M., Schneider, A.F., Larsen, C.E., 1985. Late Wisconsin and Holocene history of the Lake Michigan Basin. In: Karrow, P.F., Calkin, P.E., (Eds.), Quaternary Evolution of the Great Lakes. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 30.
  7. Huber, 1987, A vegetational reconstruction from Big Rice Lake, St. Louis County, Minnesota, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 4, 91
  8. Huber, 1987, A pollen sequence associated with Paleoindian presence in northeastern Minnesota, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 4, 89
  9. Johnson, R., 1997. Pre-Clovis possibilities in Southeastern Wisconsin. Master of Science Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
  10. Joyce, D., 2002. Chronological placement of the Schaefer mammoth exploitation site, Kenosha County, Wisconsin. Paper presented at the Midwest Archaeological Conference, Columbus. Manuscript on file, Kenosha Public Museum, Kenosha, Wisconsin.
  11. Joyce, 2002, A chronological assessment of the Schaefer mammoth site, Southeastern Wisconsin, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 19, 43
  12. King, 1973, Late Pleistocene palynology and biogeography of the western Missouri Ozarks, Ecological Monographs, 43, 539, 10.2307/1942305 · DOI
  13. King, 1981, Late Quaternary vegetational history of Illinois, Ecological Monographs, 51, 43, 10.2307/2937306 · DOI
  14. Laws, 1966, Age criteria for the African elephant, Loxodonta a. africana, East African Wildlife Journal, 4, 1, 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1966.tb00878.x · DOI
  15. Lister, A., 1996. Sexual dimorphism in the mammoth pelvis: an aid to gender determination. In: The Proboscidea, Evolution and Paleoecology of Elephants and Their Relatives, pp. 254–259. · DOI
  16. Neiberger, 2004, Schaefer mammoth: ancient pathology, Central States Archaeological Journal, 51, 82
  17. Overstreet, 1998, Late Pleistocene geochronology and the Paleoindian penetration of the Southwestern Lake Michigan Basin, The Wisconsin Archaeologist, 79, 28
  18. Overstreet, 2003, Geoarchaeological contexts for Late Pleistocene Archaeological Sites with human-modified woolly mammoth remains in Southeastern Wisconsin, USA, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 18, 91, 10.1002/gea.10052 · DOI
  19. Overstreet, 1997, Additions to a revised chronology for cultural and non-Cultural Mammoth and Mastodon fossils in the Southwestern Lake Michigan Basin, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 14, 70
  20. Overstreet, 1993, Cultural contexts of mammoths and mastodont in the Southwest Lake Michigan Basin, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 10, 75
  21. Overstreet, 1995, More on cultural contexts of Mammoth and mastodon in Southwestern Lake Michigan Basin, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 12, 40
  22. Poiner, 1996, Amino acid racemization and the preservation of ancient DNA, Science, 272, 864, 10.1126/science.272.5263.864 · DOI
  23. Schneider, A., 1983. Wisconsin stratigraphy and glacial sequence in Southeastern Wisconsin. In: Mickelson, D., Clayton, L. (Eds.), Late Pleistocene History of Southeastern Wisconsin. Geoscience Wisconsin, vol. 7. pp. 59–85. · DOI
  24. Schneider, A., Need, E., 1985. Lake Milwaukee: an “early” Proglacial Lake in the Lake Michigan Basin. In: Karrow, P., Calkin, P. (Eds.), Quaternary Evolution of the Great Lakes. Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 30.
  25. Schweger, 1969, Pollen analysis of Iola Bog and paleoecology of the two creeks forest bed, Wisconsin, Ecology, 50, 859, 10.2307/1933700 · DOI
  26. Stafford, 1990, Late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions and the Clovis culture: absolute ages based on accelerator 14C dating of skeletal remains, vol. 1, 118
  27. Stafford, 1991, Accelerator radiocarbon dating at the molecular level, Journal of Archaeological Sciences, 70, 515
  28. Van Zant, 1979, Late and postglacial pollen and plant macrofossils from Lake West Okoboji, northeastern Iowa, Quaternary Research, 12, 358, 10.1016/0033-5894(79)90034-6 · DOI
  29. Webb, 1987, The appearance and disappearance of major vegetational assemblages: long-term vegetational dynamics in Eastern North America, Vegetation, 69, 177, 10.1007/BF00038699 · DOI
  30. West, 1961, Late- and postglacial vegetational history in Wisconsin, particularly changes associated with the Valders readvance, American Journal of Science, 259, 766, 10.2475/ajs.259.10.766 · DOI
  31. Williams, A., 1974. Late-glacial–postglacial vegetational history of the Pretty Lake region, northeastern Indiana. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 686-B, 23p. · DOI
  32. Wonson-Liukkonen, 1987, A paleoecological reconstruction from August Lake County, Minnesota, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 4, 98
  33. Wright, 1963, Two pollen diagrams from southeastern Minnesota: Problems in the regional late-glacial and postglacial vegetational history, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 74, 1371, 10.1130/0016-7606(1963)74[1371:TPDFSM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  34. Yerkes, 1993, Recent developments in the analysis of Lithic Artifacts, Journal of Archaeological Research, 1, 89, 10.1007/BF01326933 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Joyce, D. J.
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
142-143
Pages
44-57
ISSN
1040-6182
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review