Cited by 229Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas

Waters, Michael R., Forman, Steven L., Jennings, Thomas A., Nordt, Lee C., Driese, Steven G., Feinberg, Joshua M., Keene, Joshua L., Halligan, Jessi +5 more·2011·Science

Abstract

Compelling archaeological evidence of an occupation older than Clovis (~12.8 to 13.1 thousand years ago) in North America is present at only a few sites, and the stone tool assemblages from these sites are small and varied. The Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas, contains an assemblage of 15,528 artifacts that define the Buttermilk Creek Complex, which stratigraphically underlies a Clovis assemblage and dates between ~13.2 and 15.5 thousand years ago. The Buttermilk Creek Complex confirms the emerging view that people occupied the Americas before Clovis and provides a large artifact assemblage to explore Clovis origins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1201855

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In recent years, there is an emerging consensus that people arrived in North America at or before 15,000 years ago.

    “In recent years, there is an emerging consensus that people arrived in North America at or before 15,000 years ago, as suggested by several site discoveries over the past few decades [8–16].”
  • The type of ephemeral records revealed at sites like MV-I and CH-I does not easily fit the criteria of more laterally and/or vertically dense cultural deposits evidenced at later sites, such as MV-II, Arroyo Seco in Argentina, Gault and Friedkin sites in Texas, Clovis and other early localities in North America.

    “Furthermore, the type of ephemeral records revealed at sites like MV-I and CH-I does not easily fit the criteria of more laterally and/or vertically dense cultural deposits evidenced at later sites, such as MV-II, Arroyo Seco in Argentina [52], Gault and Friedkin sites in Texas [9–10], Clovis and other early localities in North America [1,8,11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, M. R., Forman, S. L., Jennings, T. A., Nordt, L. C., Driese, S. G., Feinberg, J. M., Keene, J. L., Halligan, J., Lindquist, A., Pierson, J., Hallmark, C. T., Collins, M. B., & Wiederhold, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Texas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Waters, Michael R.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-03-25
Volume
331
Issue
6024
Pages
1599-1603
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2028292442
Cited by
229
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 18
FWCI
106.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
Clovis, lithic assemblages, Early Holocene, stratigraphy, artifact assemblages
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Archaeology, Humans, Texas, Geologic Sediments, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review