Cited by 115Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 82 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas

Open access

Abstract

Stemmed projectile points are ~13,500 to ~15,500 years old and lie stratigraphically below ~13,000-year-old Clovis artifacts., Lanceolate projectile points of the Clovis complex and stemmed projectile points of the Western Stemmed Tradition first appeared in North America by ~13 thousand years (ka) ago. The origin, age, and chronological superposition of these stemmed and lanceolate traditions are unclear. At the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas, below Folsom and Clovis horizons, we find stemmed projectile points dating from ~13.5 to ~15.5 ka ago, with a triangular lanceolate point form appearing ~14 ka ago. The sequential relationship of stemmed projectile points followed by lanceolate forms suggests that lanceolate points are derived from stemmed forms or that they originated from two separate migrations into the Americas.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

At the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas, 12 complete and fragmentary stemmed and triangular lanceolate projectile points from the Buttermilk Creek Complex are dated by 19 OSL ages to ~13.5–15.5 ka, stratigraphically below Folsom-Clovis. The authors argue these pre-Clovis points support an early stemmed-point tradition and present two models for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas, including possible in situ development of Clovis or a separate later migration.

Key findings

  • The Buttermilk Creek Complex horizon yielded ~100,000 artifacts, including 328 tools and 12 complete and fragmentary projectile points, dated to ~13.5–15.5 ka by 19 OSL ages and lying 15–20 cm below the Folsom-Clovis zone.
  • The projectile point assemblage includes lanceolate stemmed forms and a triangular lanceolate form; lanceolate stemmed points are confined exclusively to the Buttermilk Creek Complex horizon and are absent from post–13-thousand-year-old sediments.
  • Across the Late Prehistoric to Clovis horizons, 130 time-diagnostic artifacts form four mutually exclusive chronological zones, with no in situ diagnostics from one zone found in overlying or underlying zones; the authors use this to argue against downward artifact movement and for stratigraphic integrity.
  • OSL ages overlap known ages for later diagnostics: the Clovis point base is bracketed by 12,500 ± 480 and 12,950 ± 480 yr B.P.; the Folsom-Clovis zone ranges from 11,980 ± 490 to 13,590 ± 720 yr B.P.; Late Paleoindian ages range from 9,590 ± 370 to 11,980 ± 555 yr B.P.; Middle/Early Archaic ages range from 7,295 ± 315 to 9,000 ± 375 yr B.P.

Methods

  • Excavated 104 m² of Block A at the Debra L. Friedkin site (41BL1239) in 2006–2009 and 2015–2016 using 1 m by 1 m units, generally 5- and 2.5-cm levels, with artifacts mapped in Paleoindian levels and sediments screened through 6.35-mm and 3.175-mm mesh.
  • OSL dating targeted the 4- to 11-μm quartz fraction from clay-rich distal overbank sediments; 70 OSL ages were obtained from Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene sediments, including 38 previously published and 32 new ages, using single aliquot regeneration protocols.
  • Bayesian models in OxCal using a Poisson deposition model were created for four OSL columns to identify outliers and compute posterior age estimates; artifact analysis included time-diagnostic projectile points, use-wear, and biface technology comparisons.

Limitations

  • The paper states that radiocarbon dating was not used because no carbon samples would yield reliable ages: in situ charcoal is not preserved, all bones are leached of collagen, and bulk sediment organics were avoided as usually inaccurate.
  • The paper states that some projectile point types are poorly dated, that two OSL ages appear too young for Angostura, and that older point types can be found in younger contexts because prehistoric people sometimes picked up older points; it also notes a few Late Prehistoric/Archaic points are out of chronological order due to repeated use of cooking features.
  • Evident from the text: OSL ages carry large uncertainties (e.g., ±360 to ±880 years), and several point fragments occur 2.4 to 5.3 m from the nearest OSL column, so their ages rely on stratigraphic correlation; the paper also states that more excavations of buried and datable Late Pleistocene sites are needed to test the proposed models.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/sciadv.aat4505

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

2 of 82 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    Seven of the 11 projectile points and point fragments occur in close proximity to specific OSL ages.

    “Seven of the 11 projectile points and point fragments occur in close proximity to specific OSL ages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A 10-cm-thick zone with Folsom and Clovis artifacts occurs below the Late Paleoindian horizon.

    “A 10-cm-thick zone with Folsom and Clovis artifacts occurs below the Late Paleoindian horizon (Figs. 2 and 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The Buttermilk Creek Complex artifacts are dated to ~13.5 and ~15.5 ka ago by 19 OSL ages.

    “These artifacts are dated to ~13.5 and ~15.5 ka ago by 19 OSL ages (table S2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Seven ages from the Folsom-Clovis zone range from 11,980 ± 490 yr B.P. to 13,590 ± 720 yr B.P.

    “Seven ages from the Folsom-Clovis zone range from 11,980 ± 490 yr B.P. (BG4208) to 13,590 ± 720 yr B.P. (UIC2059; Figs. 2 and 3 and table S2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Lanceolate stemmed points include one complete specimen, one base fragment, four medial fragments, and five tips.

    “Lanceolate stemmed points include one complete specimen, one base fragment, four medial fragments, and five tips (Fig. 5, fig. S6, and table S3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 43
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Humans were present in North America during the period ~14 to ~15 ka ago, as documented by archaeological evidence radiocarbon dated to ~14.6 ka at Page-Ladson, Florida; ~14.2 ka at Paisley Caves, Oregon; ~14.2 and ~14.8 ka at Schaefer and Hebior, Wisconsin; and ~13.8 ka at Manis, Washington.

    “In North America, humans were present during the period ~14 to ~15 ka ago, as documented by archaeological evidence radiocarbon dated to ~14.6 ka ago at Page-Ladson, Florida (4); ~14.2 ka ago at Paisley Caves, Oregon (5); ~14.2 and ~14.8 ka ago at Schaefer and Hebior, Wisconsin (6, 7); and ~13.8 ka ago at Manis, Washington (8).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [4] Halligan J. J., Waters M. R., Perrotti A., Owens I. J., Feinberg J. M., Bourne M. D., Fenerty B., Winsborough B., Carlson D., Fisher D. C., Stafford T. W. Jr, Dunbar J. S., Pre-Clovis occupation 14,550 years ago at the Page-Ladson site, Florida, and the peopling of the Americas. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600375 (2016). 27386553 PMC4928949 source
    • cites [5] Gilbert M. T. P., Jenkins D. L., Götherstrom A., Naveran N., Sanchez J. J., Hofreiter M., Thomsen P. F., Binladen J., Higham T. F. G., Yohne R. M. II, Parr R., Cummings L. S., Willerslev E., DNA from pre-Clovis human coprolites in Oregon, North America. Science 320, 786– 789 (2008). 18388261 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [6] Joyce D. J., Chronology and new research on the Schaefer mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius) site, Kenosha County, Wisconsin, USA. Quat. Int. 142–143, 44– 57 (2006). source
    • cites [7] M. R. Waters, T. W. Stafford, The First Americans: A review of the evidence for the late-Pleistocene peopling of the Americas, in Paleoamerican Odyssey, K. E. Graf, C. V. Ketron, M. R. Waters, Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2014), pp. 541–560.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingnone given

    Stemmed projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site are ~13,500 to ~15,500 years old and lie stratigraphically below ~13,000-year-old Clovis artifacts.

    “Stemmed projectile points are ~13,500 to ~15,500 years old and lie stratigraphically below ~13,000-year-old Clovis artifacts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Most flake scars on the late-stage bifaces terminate at the midline, but five bifaces show flakes crossing over the midline (overface flaking) and two display a rolled edge from an overshot flake removal; two overshot flakes were found in the same deposits.

    “Most flake scars on these bifaces terminate at the midline, but five bifaces show flakes crossing over the midline of the biface (overface flaking) and two display a rolled edge from an overshot flake removal. Two overshot flakes were found in the same deposits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Forty late-stage biface fragments were found in the ~13.5- to ~15.5-thousand-year-old sediments; of these, 13 are large enough to provide insights into the production of stemmed lanceolate points.

    “Forty late-stage biface fragments were found in the ~13.5- to ~15.5-thousand-year-old sediments. Of these, 13 are large enough to provide insights into the production of stemmed lanceolate points (fig. S7 and table S3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Near the top of the Folsom-Clovis zone are a Folsom point fragment and two late-stage Folsom preform flute failures, separated up to 9 m horizontally but only 1.7 cm vertically.

    “Near the top of this zone are a Folsom point fragment and two late-stage Folsom preform flute failures (fig. S4). These Folsom artifacts are separated up to 9 m horizontally (Fig. 4F) but only 1.7 cm vertically.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Both pre-13-thousand-year-old and Clovis bifaces at the Friedkin site exhibit overface and overshot flaking, reflecting similar biface thinning strategies; however, these flaking techniques were used with greater frequency to produce Clovis preforms.

    “Both exhibit overface and overshot flaking, reflecting similar biface thinning strategies; however, these flaking techniques were used with greater frequency to produce Clovis preforms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The pre-13-thousand-year-old bifaces are predominately made on large flake blanks, whereas the Clovis bifaces were made from both nodules and flake blanks.

    “The pre–13-thousand-year-old bifaces are predominately made on large flake blanks, whereas the Clovis bifaces were made from both nodules and flake blanks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    OSL ages ranging from 11,210 ± 405 yr B.P. to 11,980 ± 555 yr B.P. occur in the zone with the Dalton/Dalton series points and agree well with the known age for Dalton at other sites.

    “The OSL ages ranging from 11,210 ± 405 yr B.P. (BG4206) to 11,980 ± 555 yr B.P. (UIC2048) occur in the zone with the Dalton/Dalton series points (Figs. 2 and 3) and again agree well with the known age for Dalton at other sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The ~13.5- to ~15.5-thousand-year-old assemblage at the Friedkin site also includes blade segments, bladelets, scrapers, bifacial discoidal cores, and snap fracture tools (radial and bend break) most commonly made on flakes but also bifaces, retouched flakes, expedient tools, and ground hematite.

    “In addition to the points and other bifaces, the ~13.5- to ~15.5-thousand-year-old assemblage at the Friedkin site also includes blade segments, bladelets, scrapers, bifacial discoidal cores, and snap fracture tools (radial and bend break) most commonly made on flakes but also bifaces, retouched flakes, expedient tools, and ground hematite.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    In the upper 0.8 to 1.1 m of the floodplain sequence at Block A, the authors recovered over 639,000 artifacts, including over 4600 tools, of which 130 are time diagnostic.

    “In the upper 0.8 to 1.1 m of the floodplain sequence at Block A, we recovered over 639,000 artifacts, including over 4600 tools, of which 130 are time diagnostic (mostly projectile points).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The other point fragments (AM12170-1, AM6233-1, AM8380-3, and AM8286-16) occur 2.4 to 5.3 m from the nearest OSL column and lie in the horizon dated between ~13.5 and ~15.5 ka ago.

    “The other point fragments (AM12170-1, AM6233-1, AM8380-3, and AM8286-16) occur 2.4 to 5.3 m from the nearest OSL column. These points lie in the horizon dated between ~13.5 and ~15.5 ka ago.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The four zones occur in chronological order, with Late Prehistoric and Late Archaic artifacts near the surface, followed by a zone with only Middle Archaic and Early Archaic artifacts, then a deeper zone with Late Paleoindian point types, and below this a zone containing only Folsom and Clovis artifacts.

    “These zones occur in chronological order, with Late Prehistoric and Late Archaic artifacts occurring near the surface, followed by a zone with only Middle Archaic and Early Archaic artifacts, then by a deeper zone with Late Paleoindian point types, and below this a zone containing only Folsom and Clovis artifacts (Figs. 2 and 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Angostura points are associated with all six OSL ages from the Middle Archaic and Early Archaic horizon; four ages overlap with the known minimum age for Angostura (~8.6 ka ago), but two OSL ages appear too young for Angostura.

    “Angostura points are associated with all six OSL ages; four ages overlap with the known minimum age for Angostura (~8.6 ka ago), but two OSL ages appear too young for Angostura.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    Forty-four Late Prehistoric and Late Archaic points are in chronological order.

    “Forty-four Late Prehistoric and Late Archaic points are in chronological order (Figs. 2 and 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Three OSL ages temporally bracket the complete point (AM9875-2): the two ages below the point are 18,480 ± 880 yr B.P. and 19,410 ± 650 yr B.P., and, at 3 cm above this point, the age is 15,190 ± 465 yr B.P.

    “Three OSL ages temporally bracket the complete point (AM9875-2) that rested horizontally on older floodplain clays; the two ages below the point are 18,480 ± 880 yr B.P. (BG3994) and 19,410 ± 650 yr B.P. (BG4076), and, at 3 cm above this point, the age is 15,190 ± 465 yr B.P. (BG3995).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Nine channel flakes were recovered; seven were found within the Folsom and Clovis zone, one was found <2.5 cm below the lower boundary, and one was found <5 cm above the upper contact of this zone.

    “In addition, nine channel flakes were recovered. Seven were found within the Folsom and Clovis zone, one was found <2.5 cm below the lower boundary, and one was found <5 cm above the upper contact of this zone (Figs. 2 and 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The broken triangular lanceolate point was found at the same elevation and 1 m south of the OSL age 14,270 ± 365 yr B.P.; a second age 13,625 ± 455 yr B.P. was obtained 4.5 cm above the point.

    “This point was found at the same elevation and 1 m south of the OSL age 14,270 ± 365 yr B.P. (BG4017). A second age 13,625 ± 455 yr B.P. (BG4019) was obtained 4.5 cm above the point.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Correlation of Bayesian-modeled OSL ages and time-diagnostic artifacts shows that, in most areas of the site, floodplain sediments were horizontally deposited, but slope slightly upward at the northwest end of the 2007 excavation area and downward at the southeast end of the 2016 excavation area of Block A.

    “Correlation of Bayesian-modeled OSL ages and time-diagnostic artifacts shows that, in most areas of the site, floodplain sediments were horizontally deposited, but slope slightly upward at the northwest end of the 2007 excavation area and downward at the southeast end of the 2016 excavation area of Block A (Figs. 1 to 3).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    In the Middle Archaic and Early Archaic zone at the Friedkin site, 15 time-diagnostic Early Archaic projectile points were recovered.

    “In the Middle Archaic and Early Archaic zone at the Friedkin site, 15 time-diagnostic Early Archaic projectile points were recovered (Figs. 2 to 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    Thirty-eight OSL ages were previously published, and 32 new OSL ages were obtained in 2015 and 2016.

    “Thirty-eight OSL ages were previously published (11). Here, we present 32 new OSL ages obtained in 2015 and 2016 (table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Waters M. R., Forman S. L., Jennings T. A., Nordt L. C., Driese S. G., Feinberg J. M., Keene J. L., Halligan J., Lindquist A., Pierson J., Hallmark C. T., Collins M. B., Wiederhold J. E., The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas. Science 331, 1599– 1603 (2011). 21436451 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    The ages from the Folsom-Clovis zone fall within the known age range for Folsom (~12.2 to 12.7 ka ago) and Clovis (~12.7 to ~13 ka ago).

    “These ages fall within the known age range for Folsom (~12.2 to 12.7 ka ago) and Clovis (~12.7 to ~13 ka ago) (7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] M. R. Waters, T. W. Stafford, The First Americans: A review of the evidence for the late-Pleistocene peopling of the Americas, in Paleoamerican Odyssey, K. E. Graf, C. V. Ketron, M. R. Waters, Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2014), pp. 541–560.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The Clovis point base (AM12018-1) is within 20 cm of the 2016 column of OSL ages and is bracketed by ages of 12,500 ± 480 yr B.P. and 12,950 ± 480 yr B.P.

    “The Clovis point base (AM12018-1) is within 20 cm of the 2016 column of OSL ages and is bracketed by ages of 12,500 ± 480 yr B.P. (BG4209) and 12,950 ± 480 yr B.P. (BG4218).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingcitation

    The deepest floodplain clays are OSL dated to >16 ka ago (n = 13) and have no in situ artifacts.

    “The deepest floodplain clays are OSL dated to >16 ka ago (n = 13) and have no in situ artifacts (Figs. 2 and 3 and table S2) (11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Waters M. R., Forman S. L., Jennings T. A., Nordt L. C., Driese S. G., Feinberg J. M., Keene J. L., Halligan J., Lindquist A., Pierson J., Hallmark C. T., Collins M. B., Wiederhold J. E., The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas. Science 331, 1599– 1603 (2011). 21436451 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    The Late Paleoindian zone at the Friedkin site contains five Angostura, five St. Mary Hall, nine Golondrina, and five Dalton/Dalton series points.

    “The Late Paleoindian zone at the Friedkin site contains five Angostura, five St. Mary Hall, nine Golondrina, and five Dalton/Dalton series points (Figs. 2 and 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    Analysis of the 2016 column produced agreement indices of 187.1/179.8 with no outliers.

    “Analysis of the 2016 column produced agreement indices of 187.1/179.8 with no outliers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Findingown data

    The 2008 and 2015 columns combined into a single Bayesian age model resulted in model agreement values of 182.3/185.7 with two outliers (UIC2361 and UIC2349).

    “The 2008 and 2015 columns were combined into a single Bayesian age model that resulted in model agreement values of 182.3/185.7 with two outliers (UIC2361 and UIC2349).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The first recognizable and widespread North American archaeological traditions appeared ~13 ka ago, with people making lanceolate fluted points in central and eastern North America (Clovis Tradition) and others using stemmed projectile points in unglaciated western North America (Western Stemmed Tradition).

    “It was not until ~13 ka ago that the first recognizable and widespread North American archaeological traditions appeared, with people making lanceolate fluted points in central and eastern North America (Clovis Tradition) and others using stemmed projectile points in unglaciated western North America (Western Stemmed Tradition) (9, 10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Jenkins D. L., Davis L. G., Stafford T. W. Jr, Campos P. F., Hockett B., Jones G. T., Cummings L. S., Yost C., Connolly T. J., Yohe R. M. II, Gibbons S. C., Raghavan M., Rasmussen M., Paijmans J. L. A., Hofreiter M., Kemp B. M., Barta J. L., Monroe C., Gilbert M. T. P., Willerslev E., Clovis age Western Stemmed projectile points and human coprolites at the Paisley Caves. Science 337, 223– 228 (2012). 22798611 source
    • cites [10] Beck C., Jones G. T., Clovis and Western Stemmed: Population migration and the meeting of two technologies in the Intermountain West. Am. Antiq. 75, 81– 116 (2010). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    There is genetic continuity between the first immigrants to enter the Americas and modern Native Americans.

    “there is genetic continuity between the first immigrants to enter the Americas and modern Native Americans (1, 2)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Moreno-Mayar J. V., Potter B. A., Vinner L., Steinrücken M., Rasmussen S., Terhorst J., Kamm J. A., Albrechtsen A., Malaspinas A.-S., Sikora M., Reuther J. D., Irish J. D., Malhi R. S., Orlando L., Song Y. S., Nielsen R., Meltzer D. J., Willerslev E., Terminal Pleistocene Alaskan genome reveals first founding population of native Americans. Nature 553, 203– 207 (2018). 29323294 source
    • cites [2] Scheib C. L., Hongjie L., Desai T., Link V., Kendall C., Dewar G., Griffith P. W., Mörseburg A., Johnson J. R., Potter A., Kerr S. L., Endicott P., Lindo J., Haber M., Xue Y., Tyler-Smith C., Sandhu M. S., Lorenz J. G., Randall T. D., Faltyskova Z., Pagani L., Danecek P., O’Connell T. C., Martz P., Boraas A. S., Byrd B. F., Leventhal A., Cambra R., Williamson R., Lessage L., Holguin B., Ygnacio-De Soto E., Rosas J., Metspalu M., Stock J. T., Manica A., Scally A., Wegmann D., Malhi R. S., Kivisild T., Ancient human parallel lineages within North America contributed to a coastal expansion. Scien source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    The artifact assemblages from the ~14- to ~15-thousand-year-old North American sites are small and nondiagnostic, and lithic projectile points are absent.

    “However, the artifact assemblages from these ~14- to ~15-thousand-year-old North American sites are small and nondiagnostic, and lithic projectile points are absent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Luminescence dating has been used to successfully date archaeological sites in North America such as the Clovis horizon at Pavo Real, Texas, and the Archaic, Paleoindian, and pre-Clovis horizons at the Gault site, Texas.

    “Luminescence dating has also been used to successfully date archaeological sites in North America such as the Clovis horizon at Pavo Real, Texas, and the Archaic, Paleoindian, and pre-Clovis horizons at the Gault site, Texas (12, 14, 15).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] M. R. Waters, C. D. Pevny, D. L. Carlson, Clovis Lithic Technology: Investigation of a Stratified Workshop at the Gault Site, Texas (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2011).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [14] Rodrigues K., Rink W. J., Collins M. B., Williams T. J., Keen-Zebert A., Lόpez G. I., OSL ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 7, 94– 103 (2016). source
    • cites [15] Williams T. J., Collins M. B., Rodrigues K., Rink W. J., Velchoff N., Keen-Zebert A., Gilmer A., Frederick C. D., Ayala S. J., Prewitt E. R., Evidence of an early projectile point technology in North America at the Gault site, Texas, USA. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar5954 (2018). 30009257 PMC6040843 source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All bifaces are plano-convex in cross section, indicating that lanceolate stemmed points were made from flake blanks that were bifacially reduced by lateral thinning.

    “All bifaces are plano-convex in cross section, indicating that lanceolate stemmed points were made from flake blanks that were bifacially reduced by lateral thinning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The OSL method has been used for decades to date Late Quaternary deposits and has been shown to yield accurate ages; many tests have shown that OSL ages are in agreement with radiocarbon ages.

    “The OSL method has been used for decades to date Late Quaternary deposits and has been shown to yield accurate ages; many tests have shown that OSL ages are in agreement with radiocarbon ages (13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Forman S. L., Waters M. R., Optically stimulated luminescence dating and the peopling of the Americas. PaleoAmerica 2, 6– 10 (2016). source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    Within the Late Prehistoric to Clovis horizons at the Friedkin site, the relative order of time-diagnostic artifacts matches the known cultural chronology for central Texas, and the known ages for time-diagnostic artifacts overlap with OSL ages.

    “Overall, these results show that within the Late Prehistoric to Clovis horizons at the Friedkin site, the relative order of time-diagnostic artifacts matches the known cultural chronology for central Texas, and the known ages for time-diagnostic artifacts overlap with OSL ages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    It is not uncommon for older projectile point types to be found in a younger cultural context because prehistoric people would sometimes pick up older points from the surface and bring them to their camps.

    “It is not uncommon for older projectile point types to be found in a younger cultural context because prehistoric people would sometimes pick up older points from the surface and bring them to their camps.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The association of Angostura points with two OSL ages that appear too young suggests that either the Angostura type extends later in time or some of the Angostura points at the Friedkin site may be intrusive into the youngest Early Archaic sediments.

    “This suggests that either this type extends later in time or some of the Angostura points at the Friedkin site may be intrusive into the youngest Early Archaic sediments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In central Texas, the Late Prehistoric period postdates ~0.65 ka ago, and the Late Archaic period dates between ~0.65 and ~4.2 ka ago.

    “In central Texas, the Late Prehistoric period postdates ~0.65 ka ago, and the Late Archaic period dates between ~0.65 and ~4.2 ka ago (18, 19).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [18] M. B. Collins, Archeology in Central Texas, in The Prehistory of Texas, T. K. Perttula, Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2004), pp. 101–126.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [19] Lohse J., Black S. L., Cholak L. M., Toward an improved Archaic radiocarbon chronology for Central Texas. Bull. Texas Archeol. Soc. 85, 259– 287 (2014).
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationcitation

    This assemblage, combined with the newly described projectile points, makes up the Buttermilk Creek Complex.

    “This assemblage, combined with the newly described projectile points, makes up the Buttermilk Creek Complex (11, 24).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Waters M. R., Forman S. L., Jennings T. A., Nordt L. C., Driese S. G., Feinberg J. M., Keene J. L., Halligan J., Lindquist A., Pierson J., Hallmark C. T., Collins M. B., Wiederhold J. E., The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas. Science 331, 1599– 1603 (2011). 21436451 source
    • cites [24] Jennings T. A., Waters M. R., Pre-Clovis lithic technology at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas: Comparisons to Clovis through site-level behavior, technological trait-list, and cladistics analysis. Am. Antiq. 79, 25– 44 (2014). source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Below the Middle Archaic and Early Archaic zone is a 25-cm-thick zone with Late Paleoindian diagnostic artifacts, known to date ~9 to 12 ka ago in central Texas.

    “Below the Middle Archaic and Early Archaic zone is a 25-cm-thick zone with Late Paleoindian diagnostic artifacts, known to date ~9 to 12 ka ago in central Texas (18, 20, 22, 23).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [18] M. B. Collins, Archeology in Central Texas, in The Prehistory of Texas, T. K. Perttula, Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2004), pp. 101–126.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [20] M. B. Collins, G. L. Bailey, N. A. Kenmotsu, F. A. Weir, Wilson-Leonard: An 11,000-year Archeological Record of Hunter-Gatherers in Central Texas (Studies in Archeology 31, Texas Archaeological Research Laboratory, University of Texas, 1998).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22] C. B. Bousman, B. W. Baker, and A. C. Kerr, Paleoindian Archeology in Texas, in The Prehistory of Texas, T. K. Perttula, Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2004), pp. 15–97.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [23] Jennings T. A., Smallwood A. M., Waters M. R., Exploring late Paleoindian and early Archaic unfluted lanceolate point classification in the Southern Plains. North Am. Archaeol. 36, 243– 265 (2015). source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Angostura, St. Mary Hall, and Golondrina point types are poorly dated, but estimates place Golondrina at ~9.6 to ~11.2 ka ago, St. Mary Hall at ~9.8 to ~11.5 ka ago, and Angostura at ~8.6 to 10.4 ka ago.

    “These types are poorly dated, but estimates place Golondrina at ~9.6 to ~11.2 ka ago, St. Mary Hall at ~9.8 to ~11.5 ka ago, and Angostura at ~8.6 to 10.4 ka ago (18, 22, 23).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] M. B. Collins, Archeology in Central Texas, in The Prehistory of Texas, T. K. Perttula, Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2004), pp. 101–126.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [22] C. B. Bousman, B. W. Baker, and A. C. Kerr, Paleoindian Archeology in Texas, in The Prehistory of Texas, T. K. Perttula, Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2004), pp. 15–97.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [23] Jennings T. A., Smallwood A. M., Waters M. R., Exploring late Paleoindian and early Archaic unfluted lanceolate point classification in the Southern Plains. North Am. Archaeol. 36, 243– 265 (2015). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In central Texas, the Middle Archaic dates between ~4.2 and ~5.7 ka ago, and the Early Archaic dates from ~5.7 to ~8.6 ka ago.

    “In central Texas, the Middle Archaic dates between ~4.2 and ~5.7 ka ago, and the Early Archaic dates from ~5.7 to ~8.6 ka ago (18–20).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] M. B. Collins, Archeology in Central Texas, in The Prehistory of Texas, T. K. Perttula, Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2004), pp. 101–126.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [19] Lohse J., Black S. L., Cholak L. M., Toward an improved Archaic radiocarbon chronology for Central Texas. Bull. Texas Archeol. Soc. 85, 259– 287 (2014).
    • cites [20] M. B. Collins, G. L. Bailey, N. A. Kenmotsu, F. A. Weir, Wilson-Leonard: An 11,000-year Archeological Record of Hunter-Gatherers in Central Texas (Studies in Archeology 31, Texas Archaeological Research Laboratory, University of Texas, 1998).

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The sediments at the Friedkin site are ideal for OSL dating because of the low-energy fluvial depositional environment; slow incremental deposition and weak pedogenic alteration ensured solar resetting of sediment grains before burial, and after burial the sediments were minimally disturbed.

    “The sediments at the Friedkin site are ideal for OSL dating because of the low-energy fluvial depositional environment. The slow incremental deposition on the floodplain and associated weak pedogenic alternation ensured solar resetting of sediment grains before burial. After burial, the sediments on the floodplain were minimally disturbed (11, 13, 16, 17).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [11] Waters M. R., Forman S. L., Jennings T. A., Nordt L. C., Driese S. G., Feinberg J. M., Keene J. L., Halligan J., Lindquist A., Pierson J., Hallmark C. T., Collins M. B., Wiederhold J. E., The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas. Science 331, 1599– 1603 (2011). 21436451 source
    • cites [13] Forman S. L., Waters M. R., Optically stimulated luminescence dating and the peopling of the Americas. PaleoAmerica 2, 6– 10 (2016). source
    • cites [16] Driese S. G., Nordt L. C., Waters M. R., Keene J. L., Analysis of site formation history and potential disturbance of stratigraphic context in Vertisols at the Debra L. Friedkin archaeological site in central Texas, USA. Geoarchaeology 28, 221– 248 (2013). source
    • cites [17] Lindquist A. K., Feinberg J. M., Waters M. R., Rock magnetic properties of a soil developed on an alluvial deposit at Buttermilk Creek, Texas, USA. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12, 1– 11 (2011). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    At Cooper's Ferry, Idaho, stemmed points are reported to date to ~13.2 ka ago.

    “At Cooper’s Ferry, Idaho, stemmed points are reported to date to ~13.2 ka ago (Fig. 6) (28), but additional chronological information is needed to confirm this proposed age.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Davis L. G., Nyers A. J., Willis S. C., Context, provenance, and technology of a Western Stemmed Tradition artifact cache from the Cooper’s Ferry site, Idaho. Am. Antiq. 79, 596– 615 (2014). source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    The OSL ages associated with each cultural zone agree with the known age of the time-diagnostic artifacts found in each zone, demonstrating the accuracy of these ages.

    “In addition, the OSL ages associated with each cultural zone agree with the known age of the time-diagnostic artifacts found in each zone, demonstrating the accuracy of these ages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    At Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Pennsylvania, the Miller point may be dated to ~14 ka ago.

    “At Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Pennsylvania (Fig. 6A), the Miller point (Fig. 5P) with its subtle shoulder and short stem may be dated to ~14 ka ago (7), but this age remains to be confirmed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] M. R. Waters, T. W. Stafford, The First Americans: A review of the evidence for the late-Pleistocene peopling of the Americas, in Paleoamerican Odyssey, K. E. Graf, C. V. Ketron, M. R. Waters, Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2014), pp. 541–560.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Study design and conductown data

    The recycling ratio was 1.00 ± 0.05 in the dose reproducibility test.

    “A test for dose reproducibility was also performed following procedures of (36) with the initial and final regenerative dose of 4.2 Gy (fig. S2), with the resultant recycling ratio of 1.00 ± 0.05.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] Murray A. S., Wintle A. G., The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: Potential for improvements in reliability. Radiat. Meas. 37, 377– 381 (2003). source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductcitation

    All resultant samples showed weak emissions with infrared excitation at or close to background counts, and the ratio of emissions from blue to infrared excitation of >20, indicating a spectrally pure quartz extract.

    “All resultant samples showed weak emissions (<400 counts/s) with infrared excitation at or close to background counts, and the ratio of emissions from blue to infrared excitation of >20, indicating a spectrally pure quartz extract (35).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] Duller G. A. T., Bøtter-Jensen L., Murray A. S., Combining infrared- and green-laser stimulation sources in single-grain luminescence measurements of feldspar and quartz. Radiat. Meas. 37, 543– 550 (2003). source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    De distributions were log normal and exhibited overdispersion values ≤20%, except for sample DF16-05.

    “De distributions were log normal and exhibited overdispersion values ≤20%, except for sample DF16-05 (table S1 and figs. S1 and S2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Both models are compatible with the current human genetic evidence and what is known about the opening of the coastal and inland corridors.

    “Both models are compatible with the current human genetic evidence and what is known about the opening of the coastal and inland corridors (1, 2, 32).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] Moreno-Mayar J. V., Potter B. A., Vinner L., Steinrücken M., Rasmussen S., Terhorst J., Kamm J. A., Albrechtsen A., Malaspinas A.-S., Sikora M., Reuther J. D., Irish J. D., Malhi R. S., Orlando L., Song Y. S., Nielsen R., Meltzer D. J., Willerslev E., Terminal Pleistocene Alaskan genome reveals first founding population of native Americans. Nature 553, 203– 207 (2018). 29323294 source
    • cites [2] Scheib C. L., Hongjie L., Desai T., Link V., Kendall C., Dewar G., Griffith P. W., Mörseburg A., Johnson J. R., Potter A., Kerr S. L., Endicott P., Lindo J., Haber M., Xue Y., Tyler-Smith C., Sandhu M. S., Lorenz J. G., Randall T. D., Faltyskova Z., Pagani L., Danecek P., O’Connell T. C., Martz P., Boraas A. S., Byrd B. F., Leventhal A., Cambra R., Williamson R., Lessage L., Holguin B., Ygnacio-De Soto E., Rosas J., Metspalu M., Stock J. T., Manica A., Scally A., Wegmann D., Malhi R. S., Kivisild T., Ancient human parallel lineages within North America contributed to a coastal expansion. Scien source
    • cites [32] Lesnek A. J., Briner J. P., Lindqvist C., Baichtal J. F., Heaton T. H., Deglaciation of the Pacific coastal corridor directly preceded the human colonization of the Americas. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar5040 (2018). 29854947 PMC5976267 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The Iztapan sites fall between ~14.5 and ~10.8 ka ago based on dated tephra layers.

    “The Iztapan sites are not directly dated, but dated tephra layers bracketing the mammoth remains and associated artifacts suggest that they fall between ~14.5 and ~10.8 ka ago (30).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Gonzalez S., Huddart D., Israde-Alcántara I., Domínguez-Vázquez G., Bischoff J., Felstead N., Paleoindian sites from the Basin of Mexico: Evidence from stratigraphy, tephrochronology and dating. Quat. Int. 363, 4– 19 (2015). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    El Jobo and later stemmed Fishtail points became widespread across South America ~13 ka ago.

    “with El Jobo and later stemmed Fishtail points becoming widespread across South America ~13 ka ago (31).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] N. Flegenheimer, L. Miotti, N. Mazzia, Rethinking early objects and landscapes in the Southern Cone: Fishtail-point concentrations in the Pampas and northern Patagonia, in Paleoamerican Odyssey, K. E. Graf, C. V. Ketron, M. R. Waters, Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2014), pp. 359–376.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The triangular lanceolate point form could have developed in situ from the earlier lanceolate stemmed point and could be the precursor to the lanceolate, fluted Clovis point.

    “This form could have developed in situ from the earlier lanceolate stemmed point and could be the precursor to the lanceolate, fluted Clovis point.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The continuous increase in lithic reduction activity at the Friedkin site is due to either increasing human populations or increasing site occupation span and decreasing mobility over time.

    “because of either increasing human populations or increasing site occupation span and decreasing mobility over time (Fig. 4A).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Similarities exist between the bifaces and tool assemblages of the Buttermilk Creek Complex and Clovis and may suggest that Clovis emerged in situ from the Buttermilk Creek Complex.

    “Similarities exist between the bifaces and tool assemblages of the Buttermilk Creek Complex and Clovis and may suggest that Clovis emerged in situ from the Buttermilk Creek Complex (11, 24).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Waters M. R., Forman S. L., Jennings T. A., Nordt L. C., Driese S. G., Feinberg J. M., Keene J. L., Halligan J., Lindquist A., Pierson J., Hallmark C. T., Collins M. B., Wiederhold J. E., The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas. Science 331, 1599– 1603 (2011). 21436451 source
    • cites [24] Jennings T. A., Waters M. R., Pre-Clovis lithic technology at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas: Comparisons to Clovis through site-level behavior, technological trait-list, and cladistics analysis. Am. Antiq. 79, 25– 44 (2014). source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    At Monte Verde, Chile, people used stemmed El Jobo projectile points by ~14.2 ka ago.

    “At Monte Verde, Chile (Fig. 6A), people used stemmed El Jobo projectile points by ~14.2 ka ago (7)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] M. R. Waters, T. W. Stafford, The First Americans: A review of the evidence for the late-Pleistocene peopling of the Americas, in Paleoamerican Odyssey, K. E. Graf, C. V. Ketron, M. R. Waters, Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2014), pp. 541–560.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The stemmed and lanceolate point traditions of North America may represent two separate human migrations that took different routes south of the continental ice sheets and accessed and settled different parts of the unglaciated continent at the end of the Pleistocene.

    “Alternatively, the stemmed and lanceolate point traditions of North America may represent two separate human migrations that took different routes south of the continental ice sheets and accessed and settled different parts of the unglaciated continent at the end of the Pleistocene (Fig. 6C) (33).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] L. G. Davis, S. C. Willis, S. J. Macfarlan, Lithic technology, cultural transmission, and the nature of the Far Western Paleoarchaic/Paleoindian co-tradition, in Meeting at the Margins, D. Rhode, Ed. (Univ. Utah Press, 2012), pp. 47–64.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Clovis was dated to ~12.7 to ~13 ka ago and Folsom ~12.2 to ~12.7 ka ago.

    “It was not until many years later that Clovis was dated to ~12.7 to ~13 ka ago and Folsom ~12.2 to ~12.7 ka ago (7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] M. R. Waters, T. W. Stafford, The First Americans: A review of the evidence for the late-Pleistocene peopling of the Americas, in Paleoamerican Odyssey, K. E. Graf, C. V. Ketron, M. R. Waters, Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press, 2014), pp. 541–560.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

56 of 56
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The connection between the artifact assemblages of the ~14- to ~15-thousand-year-old North American sites and later Clovis and Western Stemmed Traditions remains unclear.

    “The connection between the artifact assemblages of the ~14- to ~15-thousand-year-old North American sites and later Clovis and Western Stemmed Traditions remains unclear.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    According to the geological principle of inclusions, any items, such as artifacts, in an undisturbed sedimentary deposit are at least as old as the sediments that contain them.

    “according to the geological principle of inclusions, any items, such as artifacts, in an undisturbed sedimentary deposit, such as the floodplain clays at the Friedkin site, are at least as old as the sediments that contain them”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The U and Th decay series are in secular equilibrium in the dated sediments.

    “The U and Th content of the sediments, assuming secular equilibrium in the decay series, 40K, and Rb, was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry by ALS Laboratories (Reno, NV).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The moisture content of the dated sediments during burial was similar to that of the nearby pedons used to derive it.

    “Moisture content (weight percent) during the burial period was derived from instrumented, nearby pedons whose floodplain soils were similar to those that formed along a higher-order tributary, such as Buttermilk Creek (11).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cosmic ray dose rate component can be estimated from the current depth of burial.

    “A significant cosmic ray component between 0.24 and 0.29 mGy/year was included in the estimated dose rate, taking into account the current depth of burial (44).”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Late Prehistoric/Late Archaic point totals disagree

    Minor

    The paper lists 10 Late Prehistoric and 35 Late Archaic diagnostic points, totaling 45. It later accounts for 44 in chronological order and four out of order, totaling 48.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. M. R. Waters T. W. Stafford The First Americans: A review of the evidence for the late-Pleistocene peopling of the Americas in Paleoamerican Odyssey K. E. Graf C. V. Ketron M. R. Waters Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press 2014) pp. 541–560.
  2. M. R. Waters C. D. Pevny D. L. Carlson Clovis Lithic Technology: Investigation of a Stratified Workshop at the Gault Site Texas (Texas A&M Univ. Press 2011).
  3. M. B. Collins Archeology in Central Texas in The Prehistory of Texas T. K. Perttula Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press 2004) pp. 101–126.
  4. J. Lohse, S. L. Black, L. M. Cholak, Toward an improved Archaic radiocarbon chronology for Central Texas. Bull. Texas Archeol. Soc. 85, 259–287 (2014).
  5. C. B. Bousman B. W. Baker and A. C. Kerr Paleoindian Archeology in Texas in The Prehistory of Texas T. K. Perttula Ed. (Texas A&M Univ. Press 2004) pp. 15–97.
  6. N. Flegenheimer L. Miotti N. Mazzia Rethinking early objects and landscapes in the Southern Cone: Fishtail-point concentrations in the Pampas and northern Patagonia in Paleoamerican Odyssey K. E. Graf C. V. Ketron M. R. Waters Eds. (Texas A&M Univ. Press 2014) pp. 359–376.
  7. L. G. Davis S. C. Willis S. J. Macfarlan Lithic technology cultural transmission and the nature of the Far Western Paleoarchaic/Paleoindian co-tradition in Meeting at the Margins D. Rhode Ed. (Univ. Utah Press 2012) pp. 47–64.
  8. D. A. Suhm E. B. Jelks Handbook of Texas Archaeology: Type Descriptions (Texas Memorial Museum Bulletin no. 4 1962).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Waters, M. R., Keene, J. L., Forman, S. L., Prewitt, E. R., Carlson, D. L., & Wiederhold, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Waters, Michael R.
Venue
Science Advances
Published
2018-10-05
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
eaat4505-eaat4505
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898132821
Cited by
115
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
FWCI
47.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • North Star Archaeological Research Program
  • Elfrieda Frank Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
pre-Clovis, projectile points, stemmed projectile points, Folsom points, peopling of the Americas, Late Pleistocene, lithic chronology, Texas
MeSH terms
Americas, Archaeology, Bayes Theorem, Geology, Humans, Luminescent Measurements, Texas, Geologic Sediments, History, Ancient, Human Migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review