The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Paleoindian sites from the Basin of Mexico: Evidence from stratigraphy, tephrochronology and dating
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Mexico, a stemmed projectile point along with other artifacts was associated with the bones of a single mammoth buried in undisturbed lacustrine sediments at Santa Isabel Iztapan I.
“In Mexico, a stemmed projectile point (Fig. 5O), along with other artifacts, was associated with the bones of a single mammoth buried in undisturbed lacustrine sediments at Santa Isabel Iztapan I (Fig. 6A) (29, 30).”
From Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
The Iztapan sites fall between ~14.5 and ~10.8 ka ago based on dated tephra layers.
“The Iztapan sites are not directly dated, but dated tephra layers bracketing the mammoth remains and associated artifacts suggest that they fall between ~14.5 and ~10.8 ka ago (30).”
From Pre-Clovis projectile points at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas—Implications for the Late Pleistocene peopling of the Americas (2018) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Arce, 2003, The 10.5 ka Plinian eruption of Nevado de Toluca, Mexico, stratigraphical and hazard implications, Geological Society of America Bulletin, 115, 230, 10.1130/0016-7606(2003)115<0230:TKPEON>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Arellano, 1946, El Elefante fosil de Tepexpan y el Hombre primitivo, Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropologicos, 8, 89
- Arroyo-Cabrales, 2003, The Late Pleistocene paleoenvironments of the Basin of Mexico- evidence from the Tocuila Mammoth site, Deinsea, 9, 267
- Aveleyra Arroyo de Anda, 1956, The second Mammoth and associated artifacts at Santa Isabel Iztapan, Mexico, American Antiquity, 22, 12, 10.2307/276164 · DOI
- Aveleyra Arroyo de Anda, 1952, Asociación de Artefactos con Mamut en el Pleistoceno Superior de la Cuenca de Mexico, Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos, 13, 3
- Aveleyra Arroyo de Anda, 1953, Association of Artifacts with Mammoth in the Valley of Mexico, American Antiquity, 18, 332, 10.2307/277101 · DOI · Paper page
- Bárcenas, 1887, Noticia acerca del hallazgo de restos humanos prehistóricos en el Valle de México, vol. 7, 257
- Bloomfield, 1977, Late Quaternary Tephrachronology of Nevado de Toluca Volcano, Central Mexico, Overseas Geology and Mineral Resources, 46, 1
- Bradbury, 1971, Paleolimnology of Lake texcoco, evidence from diatoms, Limnology and Oceanography, 16, 180, 10.4319/lo.1971.16.2.0180 · DOI
- Bradbury, 1989, Late Quaternary lacustrine paleoenvironments in the Cuenca de México, Quaternary Science Reviews, 8, 75, 10.1016/0277-3791(89)90022-X · DOI
- Caballero Miranda, 1997, The Last Glacial Maximum in the Basin of Mexico: the diatom record between 34,000 and 15,000 years BP from Lake Chalco, Quaternary International, 43/44, 125, 10.1016/S1040-6182(97)00028-1 · DOI
- Firestone, 2007, Evidence for an extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megafaunal extinctions and the Younger Dryas cooling, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 16016, 10.1073/pnas.0706977104 · DOI
- García-Bárcena, 1986, Algunos aspectos cronológicos, vol. 115, 219
- Gonzalez, 2003, Earliest humans in the Americas: new evidence from Mexico, Journal of Human Evolution, 44, 379, 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00004-6 · DOI
- Gonzalez, 2006, Mammoths from the Basin of Mexico: stratigraphy and radiocarbon dating, vol. 500, 263
- Gonzalez, 2014, Tocuila mammoths, Basin of Mexico: Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene stratigraphy and the geological context of the bone assemblage, Quaternary Science Reviews, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.02.003 · DOI
- Haynes, 1969, The earliest Americans, Science, 166, 709, 10.1126/science.166.3906.709 · DOI
- Israde -Alcántara, 2012, Evidence for Central Mexico supporting the Younger Dryas extraterrestrial impact hypothesis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, E738, 10.1073/pnas.1110614109 · DOI
- Jiménez-López, 2006, La Mujer del Peñon III, vol. 500, 49
- Johnson, 2001, Late pleistocene bone technology at tocuila, Basin of Mexico, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 18, 13
- Kennett, 2009, Nanodiamonds in the Younger Dryas boundary sediment layer, Science, 323, 94, 10.1126/science.1162819 · DOI
- Lamb, 2009, Tepexpan Palaeoindian site, Basin of Mexico: multi-proxy evidence for environmental change during the late Pleistocene–late Holocene, Quaternary Science Reviews, 28, 2000, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.04.001 · DOI
- Lozano-García, 1993, Late pleistocene and holocene paleoenvironments of chalco Lake, Central Mexico, Quaternary Research, 40, 332, 10.1006/qres.1993.1086 · DOI
- Lorenzo, 1986, vol. 32
- Martinez del Rio, 1952, El Mamut de Santa Isabel Iztapan, Cuadernos Americanos, 9, 149
- Mirambell, 1967, Excavaciones en un sitio pleistocénico de Tlapacoya, México, Boletin, Instituto Nacional de Antrolopogía y Hitsoria, México, 29, 37
- Mirambell, 1986, Restos culturales en horizontes pleistocénicos, vol. 115, 207
- Mooser, 1967, Tefracronologia de la Cuenca de Mexico para los ultimos treinta mil años, Boletin del INAH de Mexico, 30, 12
- Morett, 1998, Tocuila Mammoth site, Current Research in the Pleistocene, 15, 118
- Newberry, 1887, Discusiones acerca del Hombre de Peñon, vol. 7, 284
- Ortega-Guerrero, 1998, Geochemical characterization of late pleistocene and holocene tephra layers from the Basin of Mexico, Central Mexico, Quaternary Research, 50, 90, 10.1006/qres.1998.1975 · DOI
- Pichardo, 2000, Redating Iztapan and Valsequillo, Mexico, Radiocarbon, 42, 305, 10.1017/S0033822200059117 · DOI
- Reyes, 1923, Los Elephantes de la Cuenca de México, Revista Mexicana de Biologia, 111, 227
- Siebe, 1999, Mammoth bones embedded in a late Pleistocene lahar from Popocatépetl volcano, near Tocuila, central Mexico, Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 111, 1550, 10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<1550:MBEIAL>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- Urrutia-Fucugauchi, 1993, Implicaciones de los datos paleomagneticos sobre la edad de la Sierra de Chichinautzin, cuenca de Mexico, Geofısica Internacional, 32, 523, 10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1993.32.3.527 · DOI
- Urrutia-Fucugauchi, 1995, Palaeomagnetic and palaeoenvironmental studies in the southern Basin of México- 11 Late Pleistocene–Holocene Chalco lacustrine record, Geofisica International, 43, 33, 10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1995.34.1.1272 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Late Pleistocene exploration and settlement of the Americas by modern humans
Waters, M. R. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat5447 · Cited by 176
Waters, M. R., Keene, J. L., Forman, S. L., Prewitt, E. R., Carlson, D. L., & Wiederhold, J. E. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat4505 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez, S., Huddart, D., Israde -Alcántara, I., Domínguez-Vázquez, G., Bischoff, J., & Felstead, N.
- Venue
- Quaternary International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 363
- Pages
- 4-19
- ISSN
- 1040-6182
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Liverpool John Moores University
- NERC (NE/C519446/1)
- Coordinación de Investigación Científica de la Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Mexico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
