Cited by 1,817Tree-ring climate responsesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Stable isotopes in tree rings

Open access
McCarroll, Danny, Loader, Neil J.·2004·Quaternary Science Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.06.017

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarroll, D., & Loader, N. J.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
McCarroll, Danny
Venue
Quaternary Science Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
23
Issue
7-8
Pages
771-801
ISSN
0277-3791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963758874
Cited by
1,817
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 132 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 106 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 68
FWCI
27.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quaternary Science Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
stable isotopes, tree rings, paleoclimate reconstruction, carbon isotopes, oxygen isotopes, hydrogen isotopes, stomatal conductance, vapor pressure deficit, source water, isotope chronology, Holocene, sample preparation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review