CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Palaeoecology and the Harappan Civilisation of South Asia: a reconsideration

Madella, Marco, Fuller, Dorian Q.·2006·Quaternary Science Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.012
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transfer of African crops to India took place at the end of the Harappan era, perhaps during the urban Harappan de-urbanisation process.

    “What the dating evidence currently suggests is that this transfer of African crops took place at the end of the Harappan era, perhaps as the urban Harappan civilisation was undergoing its transformative de-urbanisation process (see Ratnagar 2000;Madella & Fuller 2006).”

    From Across the Indian Ocean: the prehistoric movement of plants and animals (2011) · cites this paper as Madella & Fuller 2006

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Madella, M., & Fuller, D. Q.
Venue
Quaternary Science Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-06
Volume
25
Issue
11-12
Pages
1283-1301
ISSN
0277-3791
DOI
10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.10.012
Cited by
180
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review