Cited by 1,136Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchTree-ring climate responses

High-Precision Radiocarbon Age Calibration for Terrestrial and Marine Samples

Open access
Stuiver, Minze, Reimer, Paula J., Braziunas, Thomas F.·1998·Radiocarbon

Abstract

Single-year and decadal radiocarbon tree-ring ages are tabulated and discussed in terms of 14 C age calibration. The single-year data form the basis of a detailed 14 C age calibration curve for the cal ad 1510–1954 interval (“cal” denotes calibrated). The Seattle decadal data set (back to 11,617 cal BP, with 0 BP = ad 1950) is a component of the integrated decadal INTCAL98 14 C age curve (Stuiver et al. 1998). Atmospheric 14 C ages can be transformed into 14 C ages of the global ocean using a carbon reservoir model. INTCAL98 14 C ages, used for these calculations, yield global ocean 14 C ages differing slightly from previously published ones (Stuiver and Braziunas 1993b). We include discussions of offsets, error multipliers, regional 14 C age differences and marine 14 C age response to oceanic and atmospheric forcing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200019172

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A single Northern Hemisphere 14C calibration curve (IntCal), constructed mainly from known-age wood from central and northern Europe and North America, has become the basis for calendar dates for pre- and protohistory and for other work requiring an accurate absolute time scale.

    “Hence, a single NH 14C calibration curve (IntCal), constructed mainly from known-age wood from central and northern Europe and North America, has become the basis for calendar dates for pre- and protohistory and for other work requiring an accurate absolute time scale (1–4).”

    From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes dendrochronologically dated wood from Germany and North America, and the Abstract identifies the resulting Seattle data as a component of the integrated INTCAL98 curve. The paper also says CALIB incorporates INTCAL98 data, but it does not establish that a single Northern Hemisphere curve had become the basis for calendar dates across pre- and protohistory and other fields. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • We would have anticipated that the AA data on BCP and IrO should be similar to the IntCal datasets and the Hd GeO data, given the good agreement in other recent work between GeO and BCP and between GeO and IrO.

    “We would therefore have anticipated that the AA data on BCP and IrO (13) should be similar to the IntCal datasets (1–4) and the Hd GeO data (38), given the good agreement in other recent work between GeO and BCP (40–42) and between GeO and IrO (1–4).”

    From Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction identifies German and Irish oak chronologies used in the calibration work, and the Offsets section reports relatively small differences among laboratories’ radiocarbon ages. The cited paper does not directly compare German-oak and Irish-oak data or establish the specific good agreement between them asserted here; the expectation about the AA data is the citing authors’ own inference. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a long history of even the most accurate 14C laboratories systematically varying in age determinations for contemporary samples compared with other laboratories by up to ~30 14C years.

    “There is a long history of even the most accurate 14C laboratories systematically varying in age determinations for contemporary samples compared with other laboratories by up to ~30 14C years (1, 2).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Bard, E. 1988 Correction of accelerator mass spectrom- Bard, E., Arnold, M., Hamelin, B., Tisnerat-Laborde, N. etry 14C ages measured in planktonic foraminifera: Pa- and Cabioch, G. 1998 Radiocarbon calibration by leoceanographic implications. Paleoceanography 3: means of mass spectrometric 23°ThP34U and 14C ages 635-645. of corals: An updated database including samples https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200019172 Published online by Cambridge University Press from Barbados, Mururoa and Tahiti. Radiocarbon, this issue.
  2. Berkman, P. A. and Forman, S. L. 1996 Pre-bomb radio- carbon and the reservoir correction for calcareous ma- rine species in the Southern Ocean. Geophysical Re- search Letters 23: 363-366.
  3. Forman, S. L. and Polyak, L. 1997 Radiocarbon content of pre-bomb marine mollusks and variations in the 14C reservoir age for coastal areas of the Barents and Kara seas, Russia. Geophysical Research Letters 24: 885- 888.
  4. Goodfriend, G. A. and Flessa, K. W. 1997 Radiocarbon reservoir ages in the Gulf of California: Roles of up- welling and flow from the Colorado River. Radiocar- bon 39(2): 139-148.
  5. Heier-Nielsen, S., Heinemeier, J., Nielsen, H. L. and Rud, N. 1995 Recent reservoir ages for Danish fjords and marine waters. Radiocarbon 37(3): 875-882.
  6. Higham, T. F. G. and Hogg, A. G. 1995 Radiocarbon dat- ing of prehistoric shell from New Zealand and calcu- lation of the L\R value using fish otoliths. In Cook, G. T., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F. and Scott, E. M., eds., Proceedings of the 15th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 37(2): 409-416.
  7. Ingram, B. L. and Southon, J. R. 1997 Reservoir ages in eastern Pacific coastal and marine waters. Radiocar- bon 38(3): 573-582.
  8. Kennett, D. J., Ingram, B. L., Erlandson J. M. and Walker, P. 1997 Evidence for temporal fluctuations in marine radiocarbon reservoir ages in the Santa Bar- bara Channel, Southern California. Journal of Archae- ological Science 24: 1051-1059.
  9. Little, E. A. 1993 Radiocarbon age calibration at archae- ological sites of coastal Massachusetts and vicinity. Journal of Archaeological Science 20: 457-471.
  10. McCormac, F. G., Hogg, A. G., Higham, T. F. G., Lynch- Stieglitz, J., Broecker, W. S., Baillie, M. G. L., Palmer, J., Xiong, L., Pilcher, J. R., Brown, D. and Hoper S. T. 1998a Temporal variation in the interhemispheric 14C offset. Geophysical Research Letters 25: 1321-1324.
  11. Pearson, G. W., Becker, B. and Qua, F. 1993 High-preci- sion 14C measurement of German and Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from 7890 to 5000 BC.
  12. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibra- tion 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 93-104.
  13. Pearson, G. W. and Qua, F. 1993 High-precision 14C measurement of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840-5000 BC: A correction. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1):105-123.
  14. Southon, J. R., Rodman, A. 0. and True, D. 1995 A com- parison of marine and terrestrial radiocarbon ages from northern Chile. In Cook, G. T., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F. and Scott, E. M., eds., Proceedings of the 15th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 37(2): 389-393.
  15. Stuiver, M. 1982 A high-precision calibration of the AD radiocarbon time scale. Radiocarbon 24(1): 1-26.
  16. Stuiver, M. 1993 A note on single-year calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1510-1954. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Ra- diocarbon 35(1): 67-72.
  17. Stuiver, M. and Becker, B. 1986 High-precision decadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950- 2500 BC. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R., eds., Calibration Issue. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 863-910. 1993 High-precision decadal calibration of the ra- diocarbon time scale, AD 1950-6000 BC. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 35-65.
  18. Stuiver, M. and Braziunas, T. F. 1993a Sun, ocean, cli- mate and atmospheric 14CO2: An evaluation of causal and spectral relationships. The Holocene 3: 289-305. 1993b Modeling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200019172 Published online by Cambridge University Press 11 1943 -24.3 ± 1.2 204 ± 10 7 9 1942 -20.4 ± 1.2 174 ± 10 8 9 1941 -19.9 ± 1.9 170 ± 16 9 1.5 12 1940 -23.0 ± 2.0 197 ± 16 1.3 11 1939 -20.1 ± 1.8 174 ± 15 1.5 12 1938 -16.2 ± 1.2 143 ± 10 1.4 11 1937 -17.2 ± 1.6 152 ± 13 1.2 10 1936 -16.5±1.7 147±14 1935 -16.7 ± 1.9 150 ± 15 1.2 10 1934 -15.6 ± 1.8 142 ± 15 1.3 10 1933 -18.6 ± 1.8 167 ± 14 1.3 10 1932 -20.7 ± 1.2 186 ± 10 1.4 11 1931 -16.6 ± 1.8 153 ± 15 1.4 11 1930 -14.5 ± 1.2 137 ± 10 1.1 9 1929 -18.2 ± 1.0 168 ± 8 L8 15 1928 -15.5 ± 1.2 147 ± 10 1.1 9 1927 -15.7 ± 1.1 149 ± 9 1.1 9 1926 -14.7 ± 1.2 143 ± 9 1.2 9 1925 -12.3 ± 1.2 124 ± 9 1.7 14 1924 -11.4 ± 1.2 117 ± 10 1.2 10 1923 -14.1 ± 1.0 140 ± 8 1.2 9 1922 -12.2 ± 1.2 126 ± 10 1.6 13 1921 -12.9 ± 1.2 133 ± 10 1.6 13 1920 -14.1±1.3 144±10 1919 -11.1±1.2 120±10 9 1918 -11.3 ± 1.0 122 ± 8 1.5 12 1917 -9.7 ± 1.0 110 ± 8 1.7 14 1916 -11.0 ± 1.2 122 ± 10 1.1 9 1915 -6.3 ± 1.7 85 ± 14 1.8 14 1914 -7.1 ± 1.0 92 ± 8 1.2 10 1913 -7.3 ± 0.9 95 ± 7 1.1 9 78 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033822200019172 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuiver, M., Reimer, P. J., & Braziunas, T. F.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
1998
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
1127-1151
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W1508328190
Cited by
1,136
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 35
FWCI
24.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9310121)
  • University of Washington
  • Universität Heidelberg
  • Universität Stuttgart
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
Keywords
tree-ring chronology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review