Cited by 49Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchEducational Games and GamificationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

A systematic review and meta-analysis of social emotional computer based interventions for autistic individuals using the serious game framework

Tang, Julia S.Y., Chen, Nigel T.M., Falkmer, Marita, Bӧlte, Sven, Girdler, Sonya·2019·Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.101412

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Tang, J. S. Y., Chen, N. T. M., Falkmer, M., Bӧlte, S., & Girdler, S.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Tang, Julia S.Y.
Venue
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
66
Pages
101412
ISSN
  • 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-9467
OpenAlex
W2954628975
Cited by
49
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cooperative Research Centre for Living with Autism
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, serious games, computer-based intervention, socioemotional skills, game design principles, individualization, skill retention, intervention efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review