Cited by 318Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Animal Learning Development

Using computerized games to teach face recognition skills to children with autism spectrum disorder: the Let’s Face It! program

Open access
Tanaka, James W., Wolf, Julie M., Klaiman, Cheryl, Koenig, Kathleen, Cockburn, Jeffrey, Herlihy, Lauren, Brown, Carla, Stahl, Sherin +2 more·2010·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: An emerging body of evidence indicates that relative to typically developing children, children with autism are selectively impaired in their ability to recognize facial identity. A critical question is whether face recognition skills can be enhanced through a direct training intervention. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder were pre‐screened with a battery of subtests (the Let’s Face It! Skills battery) examining face and object processing abilities. Participants who were significantly impaired in their face processing abilities were assigned to either a treatment or a waitlist group. Children in the treatment group ( N = 42) received 20 hours of face training with the Let’s Face It! ( LFI! ) computer‐based intervention. The LFI! program is comprised of seven interactive computer games that target the specific face impairments associated with autism, including the recognition of identity across image changes in expression, viewpoint and features, analytic and holistic face processing strategies and attention to information in the eye region. Time 1 and Time 2 performance for the treatment and waitlist groups was assessed with the Let’s Face It! Skills battery. Results: The main finding was that relative to the control group ( N = 37), children in the face training group demonstrated reliable improvements in their analytic recognition of mouth features and holistic recognition of a face based on its eyes features. Conclusion: These results indicate that a relatively short‐term intervention program can produce measurable improvements in the face recognition skills of children with autism. As a treatment for face processing deficits, the Let’s Face It! program has advantages of being cost‐free, adaptable to the specific learning needs of the individual child and suitable for home and school applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02258.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ó 2010 The Authors Journal compilation Ó 2010 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 14697610, 2010, 8, Downloaded from https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02258.x by Mount Vernon Nazarene University, Wiley Online Library on [22/06/2026]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License in autism. Developmental Psychopathology, 17, 679- 697. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanaka, J. W., Wolf, J. M., Klaiman, C., Koenig, K., Cockburn, J., Herlihy, L., Brown, C., Stahl, S., Kaiser, M. D., & Schultz, R. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-09
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
944-952
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2109068575
Cited by
318
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 17
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0542013)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • University of Victoria
  • National Institutes of Health (SBE-0542013)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD046526)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, face recognition (cognition), computer-based intervention, interactive computer games, facial expression recognition, children
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Discrimination Learning, Face, Facial Expression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Masking, Retention, Psychology, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Video Games, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review