Cited by 28Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCommunity Development and Social ImpactCorporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability

The measurement of social impact and opportunities for research in business administration

Open access
Lazzarini, Sergio G.·2018·RAUSP Management Journal

Abstract

In the last decades, management scholars have examined ways through which firms can build profitable operations while at the same time addressing pressing social and environmental concerns. But how can organizations ascertain whether their isolated or collaborative efforts are truly generating positive impact to their target populations? Measuring real impact requires addressing several issues related to causality, comparability, and cost (given that most methods require customized data collection and analysis). In this article, I briefly discuss alternative methods to assess impact and then suggest novel research avenues to inform the debate on how to measure impact and how impact measurement practices can help organizations blend social and economic goals.Download : Download full-size image

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rauspm.2017.12.010

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Lazzarini, S. G.
Venue
RAUSP Management Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2018-01
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
134-137
ISSN
2531-0488 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2786396696
Cited by
28
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • RAUSP Management Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
Keywords
social impact measurement, corporate social responsibility, impact assessment methodology, social and economic goals, business and management research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review