Cited by 9Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFamily and Disability Support Research

Fragile X syndrome prenatal diagnosis: parental attitudes and reproductive responses

Xunclà, M., Badenas, C., Domínguez, M., Rodríguez-Revenga, L., Madrigal, I., Jiménez, L., Soler, A., Borrell, A. +2 more·2010·Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of mental retardation. It is caused by a CGG repeat expansion, which results in hypermethylation and silencing of the FMR1 gene. The results from 213 FXS prenatal diagnoses performed in the study centre were reviewed. Family history of FXS or undiagnosed mental retardation (MR) were the reasons for referral and 64% of mothers were not aware of their status so prenatal and mother tests were performed at the same time. Among those women referred for family history of unknown MR, 17.6% were found to be FXS carriers. The attitudes and perceptions of the syndrome of 52 FXS carriers were also evaluated. Most of them had been diagnosed as carriers when the child was already born and the most common feeling was sadness, followed by impotence and guilt. The majority of them had received genetic counselling and they considered it useful. Regarding reproductive options, prenatal diagnosis was chosen by 40.5% of women. Prenatal diagnosis for FXS is a good reproductive option and it should be carried out whenever family history of MR is present. A high percentage of FXS carriers are detected following this approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.05.015

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a European study of 213 fragile X syndrome prenatal diagnoses, 17.6% of those with a family history of unknown intellectual disability were found to be fragile X carriers.

    “Of note, in a recent European study of 213 FXS prenatal diagnoses, 17.6% of those with a family history of unknown ID were found to be FXS carriers (44).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xunclà, M., Badenas, C., Domínguez, M., Rodríguez-Revenga, L., Madrigal, I., Jiménez, L., Soler, A., Borrell, A., Sánchez, A., & Milà, M.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Milà, M.
Venue
Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
560-565
ISSN
1472-6483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051970842
Cited by
9
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, prenatal diagnosis, FMR1 gene, CGG repeat expansion, intellectual disability, carrier detection, parental attitudes, reproductive decision-making, genetic counseling
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Genetic Counseling, Genetic Testing, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Parents, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review